Facial Reanimation after Peripheral Facial Nerve Paralysis: A Single-institution Surgical Experience.
Shijun Li,Shang Xie,Zimeng Li,Mengkun Ding,Xiaofeng Shan,Lei Zhang,Guangyan Yu,Zhigang Cai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000009513
2023-01-01
Abstract:Facial nerve trauma occasionally develops during oral and maxillofacial surgery. This study was aimed at enhancing the available knowledge on facial nerve reanimation correlated to surgery and proposing our surgical algorithm. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients who underwent facial reanimation surgery at our hospital. The inclusion criterion was surgery for facial reanimation from January 2004 to June 2021. We included 383 eligible patients who underwent facial reanimation surgery. Trauma or maxillofacial neoplasms were noted in 208 of 383 and 164 of 383 cases, respectively. In 238 of 383 cases, nerve branches were likely more vulnerable. Facial nerve anastomosis was performed in 256 patients. Sixty-eight patients received nerve grafts. In 22 patients, distal facial nerve transfer to the masseteric nerve, sublingual nerve, or contralateral facial nerve was performed. Twenty-five patients received static surgery; in most cases, the temporalis fascia flap (20/25) was used. The nerve function outcomes were HB grade I (n=17), Grade Ⅱ (n=108), Grade Ⅲ (n=118), Grade Ⅳ (n=94), and Grade V (n=46). The mean follow-up time was 4.88 ± 3.93 years. Facial paralysis caused by trauma ( P =0.000), branch injury ( P =0.000), and the primary reconstruction of facial nerve ( P =0.000) were predictive of favorable treatment outcomes. Although facial nerve injury caused by trauma was more likely, cases of interference in facial expression could be limited, and so did the injury to branches. Nerve anastomosis was prioritized if a tension-free suture was possible. Maintaining the integrity of the nerve and shortening the duration of mimetic muscular denervation were crucial.