Efficacy of masseteric-facial nerve transfer in the treatment of peripheral facial paralysis

李腾飞,徐建国,刘雪松
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112050-20211228-00608
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of masseteric-facial nerve transfer (MFNT) technique in the treatment of peripheral facial paralysis (PFP).Methods:We conducted a retrospective study on the clinical data of 40 patients with PFP who underwent MFNT at the Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University from June 2017 to September 2020. Facial expression and facial movements as participants attempted to perform a series of facial expression tasks were documented and evaluated based on facial nerve grading scale 2.0 (FNGS 2.0) and Sunnybrook facial grading system (SFGS). Moreover, facial asymmetry index (FAI), width of palpebral fissure, deviation of the philtrum and angles or excursions of the oral commissure were applied to assess the facial symmetry and motor function in order to explore the effect of MFNT.Results:The occurrence of postoperative complication was 7.5%(3/40), including mild infection, discomfort in eyes and parotid leakage in 1 case each. Forty patients were followed up for 6.6-24.7 months(median: 13.4 months). The median interval to first contraction of facial muscles while biting after surgery was 2.4(0.8-5.6)months in 40 patients. Out of 40 patients, 34 (85%) showed significantly improved facial symmetry and movements. The FNGS 2.0 results revealed that compared to those before operation, the scores of eye closure, nasolabial folds and oral commissure motion on the affected sides post operation were evidently decreased (all P<0.001), while the synkinesis score did not increase ( P>0.05). After operation, the median grade of the patients was significantly reduced from 5.0 to 3.5 based on the FNGS 2.0( P<0.001). Patients experienced distinctly improved scores in resting and voluntary movement domains (both P<0.001) with slightly elevated scores in synkinesis domain ( P<0.05), resulting in dramatically increased composite score ( P<0.001). evaluated by the SFGS. The quantitative facial measurement indicated that both resting FAI and FAI during smiling decreased (both P<0.001). The eyelid closing capacity was notably enhanced, and the deviation of the philtrum was decreased post operation(both P<0.001). After MFNT, the oral commissure excursion on the affected side was significantly increased and the slope of bilateral oral commissure reduced significantly (both P<0.01). Conclusions:The MFNT is an effective technique for facial reanimation, which could achieve satisfactory facial symmetry, and improve facial movement with few complications. The masseteric nerve should be a preferential choice for facial nerve transfer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?