Abstract:BackgroundDNA barcoding has recently been proposed as a promising tool for the rapid species identification in a wide range of animal taxa. Two broad methods (distance and monophyly-based methods) have been used. One method is based on degree of DNA sequence variation within and between species while another method requires the recovery of species as discrete clades (monophyly) on a phylogenetic tree. Nevertheless, some issues complicate the use of both methods. A recently applied new technique, the character-based DNA barcode method, however, characterizes species through a unique combination of diagnostic characters.Methodology/principal findingsHere we analyzed 108 COI and 102 16S rDNA sequences of 40 species of Neogastropoda from a wide phylogenetic range to assess the performance of distance, monophyly and character-based methods of DNA barcoding. The distance-based method for both COI and 16S rDNA genes performed poorly in terms of species identification. Obvious overlap between intraspecific and interspecific divergences for both genes was found. The "10× rule" threshold resulted in lumping about half of distinct species for both genes. The neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree of COI could distinguish all species studied. However, the 16S rDNA tree could not distinguish some closely related species. In contrast, the character-based barcode method for both genes successfully identified 100% of the neogastropod species included, and performed well in discriminating neogastropod genera.Conclusions/significanceThis present study demonstrates the effectiveness of the character-based barcoding method for species identification in different taxonomic levels, especially for discriminating the closely related species. While distance and monophyly-based methods commonly use COI as the ideal gene for barcoding, the character-based approach can perform well for species identification using relatively conserved gene markers (e.g., 16S rDNA in this study). Nevertheless, distance and monophyly-based methods, especially the monophyly-based method, can still be used to flag species.

Evaluation of the efficacy of twelve mitochondrial protein-coding genes as barcodes for mollusk DNA barcoding.

Species identification through mitochondrial rRNA genetic analysis

Identifying the true oysters (Bivalvia: Ostreidae) with mitochondrial phylogeny and distance-based DNA barcoding.

Comparing the Usefulness of Distance, Monophyly and Character-Based DNA Barcoding Methods in Species Identification: A Case Study of Neogastropoda

Dna Barcoding Reveal Patterns Of Species Diversity Among Northwestern Pacific Molluscs

DNA Barcoding and Phylogenetic Analysis of Pectinidae (mollusca: Bivalvia) Based on Mitochondrial COI and 16S Rrna Genes

Utility of DNA Barcoding for Tellinoidea: A Comparison of Distance, Coalescent and Character-based Methods on Multiple Genes

DNA Barcoding of True Limpets (order Patellogastropoda) along Coast of China: a Case Study.

Pay Attention to the Overlooked Cryptic Diversity in Existing Barcoding Data: the Case of Mollusca with Character-Based DNA Barcoding.

Dna Barcoding of Caenogastropoda along Coast of China Based on the Coi Gene

Examination of sequence variations in partial mitochondrial 12S gene amongst damselfish species as references for DNA barcoding

The research of COⅠ-based DNA barcoding in Penaeidaes' identification

Comparison Of Potential Diatom 'Barcode' Genes (The 18s Rrna Gene And Its, Coi, Rbcl) And Their Effectiveness In Discriminating And Determining Species Taxonomy In The Bacillariophyta

DNA Barcoding for Identification of Marine Gastropod Species from Hainan Island, China

DNA Barcoding of Fishes from Zhoushan Coastal Waters Using Mitochondrial COI and 12S Rrna Genes

16S Rrna is a Better Choice Than COI for DNA Barcoding Hydrozoans in the Coastal Waters of China

DNA barcoding analysis of Coleoidea (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) from Chinese waters.

DNA Barcoding and Phylogeny in the Family Mactridae (bivalvia: Heterodonta): Evidence for Cryptic Species

High-level Diversity of Dinoflagellates in the Natural Environment, Revealed by Assessment of Mitochondrial Cox1 and Cob Genes for Dinoflagellate DNA Barcoding.

DNA Barcoding of 18 Species of Bovidae

&Lt;strong>exploring the Utility of DNA Barcoding in Species Delimitation of <em>polypedilum</em> (<em>tripodura</em>) Non-Biting Midges (diptera: Chironomidae) &Lt;/strong>