DNA barcoding for molecular identification of Demodex based on mitochondrial genes
Li Hu,YuanJun Yang,YaE Zhao,DongLing Niu,Rui Yang,RuiLing Wang,Zhaohui Lu,XiaoQi Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-017-5641-5
2017-01-01
Parasitology Research
Abstract:There has been no widely accepted DNA barcode for species identification of Demodex. In this study, we attempted to solve this issue. First, mitochondrial cox1 -5′ and 12S gene fragments of Demodex folloculorum , D. brevis , D. canis , and D. caprae were amplified, cloned, and sequenced for the first time; intra/interspecific divergences were computed and phylogenetic trees were reconstructed. Then, divergence frequency distribution plots of those two gene fragments were drawn together with mtDNA cox1 -middle region and 16S obtained in previous studies. Finally, their identification efficiency was evaluated by comparing barcoding gap. Results indicated that 12S had the higher identification efficiency. Specifically, for cox1 -5′ region of the four Demodex species, intraspecific divergences were less than 2.0%, and interspecific divergences were 21.1–31.0%; for 12S, intraspecific divergences were less than 1.4%, and interspecific divergences were 20.8–26.9%. The phylogenetic trees demonstrated that the four Demodex species clustered separately, and divergence frequency distribution plot showed that the largest intraspecific divergence of 12S (1.4%) was less than cox1 -5′ region (2.0%), cox1 -middle region (3.1%), and 16S (2.8%). The barcoding gap of 12S was 19.4%, larger than cox1 -5′ region (19.1%), cox1 -middle region (11.3%), and 16S (13.0%); the interspecific divergence span of 12S was 6.2%, smaller than cox1 -5′ region (10.0%), cox1 -middle region (14.1%), and 16S (11.4%). Moreover, 12S has a moderate length (517 bp) for sequencing at once. Therefore, we proposed mtDNA 12S was more suitable than cox1 and 16S to be a DNA barcode for classification and identification of Demodex at lower category level.