Noninvasive Ventilation with Complex Critical Care Ventilator in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Jing Zhang,Yan Wang,Jie Cao,Bao-Yuan Chen,Jing Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060514543037
2014-01-01
Journal of International Medical Research
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical effect of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV), delivered via critical care ventilator or miniventilator, in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Methods Prospective comparison study. Patients with AECOPD underwent NIPPV via: miniventilator with BiLevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP; Group A); critical care ventilator with pressure support ventilation and positive end expiratory pressure (PSV + PEEP; Group B); critical care ventilator with pressure-synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (P-SIMV)+PSV + PEEP (Group C). Physiological parameters were recorded before, during and after ventilation. Results Patients in Group C ( n = 21) showed significantly better improvements in physiological parameters (compared with pretreatment values) than those in Group B ( n = 20) or Group A ( n = 22). Conclusion NIPPV delivered via critical care ventilator has a better treatment effect than miniventilator NIPPV in patients with AECOPD. The use of P-SIMV + PSV + PEEP mode provides a significantly better treatment effect than PSV + PEEP alone.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?