Risk/benefit profile of panitumumab-based therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: evidence from five randomized controlled trials

Na-Ping Tang,Hua Li,Yun-Liang Qiu,Guo-Min Zhou,Yan Wang,Jing Ma,Yan Chang,Qi-Bing Mei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2354-6
2014-01-01
Abstract:This study aims to evaluate the risk and benefit profiles of panitumumab-based therapy (PBT) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified by searching PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Data on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), all grade and severe (grade ≥3) adverse events were extracted and pooled to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Number needed to treat (NNT) for PFS and number needed to harm (NNH) for significantly changed toxicities were calculated. A total of 4,155 patients were included in the analysis. PBT significantly improved PFS (HR random = 0.66, 95 % CI = 0.45–0.95) but not OS (HR fixed = 0.93, 95 % CI = 0.83–1.04) when used in the subsequent-line setting. The effect on PFS was more evident in patients with wild-type KRAS (HR random = 0.64, 95 % CI = 0.47–0.87) and the NNT for PFS is 11 to 23at 1 year. PBT did not benefit patients when used in the first-line setting. In addition, PBT significantly increased the risk of skin toxicity, infections, diarrhea, dehydration, mucositis, hypokalemia, fatigue, hypomagnesemia, pulmonary embolism and paronychia. The NNHs for skin toxicity, diarrhea, infection, hypokalemia and mucositis are less than 23. In conclusion, when used in the subsequent-line setting, PBT can improve the disease progression, especially in mCRC patients with wild-type KRAS . Regarding the adverse events associated with the PBT, close monitoring and necessary preparations are recommended during the therapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?