Negative hyperselection of resistance mutations for panitumumab maintenance in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (PanaMa phase II trial, AIO KRK 0212).

Arndt Stahler,Andreas J. Kind,Christine Sers,Soulafa Mamlouk,Lothar Müller,Meinolf Karthaus,Stefan Frühauf,Ullrich Graeven,Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal,Greta Sommerhäuser,Stefan Kasper,Beeke Hoppe,Annika Kurreck,Swantje Held,Volker Heinemann,David Horst,Armin Jarosch,Sebastian Stintzing,Tanja Trarbach,Dominik P. Modest
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-3023
IF: 13.801
2024-01-31
Clinical Cancer Research
Abstract:Background: We evaluated additional mutations in RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as prognostic and predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of added panitumumab to a FU/FA maintenance as pre-specified analysis of the randomized PanaMa trial. Methods: Mutations (MUT) were identified using targeted next generation sequencing (NGS; Illumina Cancer Hotspot Panel v2) and immunohistochemistry. RAS/BRAF V600E/PIK3CA/AKT1/ALK1/ERBB2/PTEN MUT and HER2/neu overexpression were negatively hyperselected and correlated with median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) since start of maintenance treatment, and objective response rates (ORR). Univariate/multivariate Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: 202 of 248 patients (81.5%) of the full analysis set (FAS) had available NGS data: Hyperselection WT: 162 (80.2%); MUT: 40 (19.8%). From start of maintenance therapy, hyperselection WT tumors were associated with longer median PFS as compared to hyperselection MUT mCRC (7.5 vs. 5.4 months; HR=0.75 (95%CI 0.52 – 1.07), P=0.11), OS (28.7 vs. 22.2 months; HR=0.53 (95%CI 0.36 – 0.77), P=0.001), and higher ORR (35.8% vs. 25.0%, P=0.26). The addition of panitumumab to maintenance was associated with significant benefit in hyperselection WT tumors for PFS (9.2 vs. 6.0 months; HR=0.66 (95%CI 0.47 – 0.93), P=0.02) and numerically also for OS (36.9 vs. 24.9 months; HR=0.91 (95%CI 0.61 – 1.36), P=0.50), but not in hyperselection MUT tumors. Hyperselection status interacted with maintenance treatment arms in terms of PFS (P=0.06) and OS (P=0.009). Conclusions: Extended molecular profiling beyond RAS may have the potential to improve of the patient selection for anti-EGFR containing maintenance regimens.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?