Abstract:Objective This study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical performance of Giomer and a self-etch adhesive system compared with a nanofilled resin composite and etch-and-rinse adhesive system in Class I and Class II restorations. Method The study was designed to be double-blinded with intra-individual control. 48 patients with 54 pairs of cavities (class I or class II) were recruited. Each pair of restorations was placed with either BEAUTIFIL II (BF) and FL-BOND II (FL) or Filtek Z350 (Z350) and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SMP). Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline, 6-month, 18-month, 4-year and 8-year after placement according to modified USPHS criteria. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log rank tests were performed (SPSS 20.0, IBM Corporation, US) to compare the survival probability of different restorations.A generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was adopted to assess the performance of the materials. The McNemar test was used to show significant changes for all the evaluation criteria and difference between them. Results At the eight-year recall, 32 patients with 67 restorations were present. There were twelve restorations in total recorded as failure due to loss of retention, restoration fracture, secondary caries, tooth fracture or endodontic treatment due to pulp necrosis. The survival probabilities and calculated annual failure rate(AFR) of BF and Z350 restorations at 8-year were 87.2 % vs 87.8 % and 1.6 % vs 1.5 % respectively with no significant difference (p > 0.05)between the two materials. Over the recall time range of eight years, decreased possibility of alpha rating was observed for retention, marginal adaptation, marginal staining and surface roughness for both materials ( p < 0.05). Decreased possibility of alpha rating was observed for surface staining and secondary caries for Z350 ( p < 0.05) and restoration fracture for BF ( p < 0.05), respectively. Comparing the two restorative systems over eight years, no significant difference was seen for linear decline of the possibility of alpha rating for any of the criteria evaluated ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Giomer material and the self-etch adhesive system had comparable clinical performance with nanofilled resin composite and etch-and-rinse adhesive system over the observation period of eight years.

Sealant Retention is Better Assessed Through Colour Photographs Than Through the Replica and the Visual Examination Methods

Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer and resin-based sealant on partially erupted permanent first mo-lars

Comparison between visual clinical examination and the replica method for assessments of sealant retention over a 2-year period

Comparative evaluation of retention, cariostatic effect and discoloration of conventional and hydrophilic sealants - A single blinded randomized split mouth clinical trial

Retention Rate of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Resin-Based Sealant under Field Conditions: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Retention Rate of Four Different Sealant Materials after Four Years.

Effectiveness of Two New Types of Sealants: Retention after 2 Years

Clinical evaluation of a surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) filler-containing dental sealant placed with a self-etching primer/adhesive

Colorimetric Assessment of Surface Sealants for Discoloration of a Nanofilled Resin Composite

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self etching pit and fissure sealant- stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscopic analyses

Optimal Use of Silver Nitrate and Marginal Leakage at the Sealant-Enamel Interface Using Micro-Ct

Validation of clinical photography and a laser fluorescence device for assessment of enamel demineralization during multi-bracketed fixed orthodontic treatment

Three Years Clinical Evaluation of Self-Eching Primer and Composite Resin on Posterior ClassⅠ Restorations

Do Light Cured ART Conventional High-Viscosity Glass-Ionomer Sealants Perform Better Than Resin-Composite Sealants: A 4-Year Randomized Clinical Trial

One-year Clinical Evaluation of Retention Ability and Anticaries Effect of a Glass Ionomer-based and a Resin-based Fissure Sealant on Permanent First Molars: An In Vivo Study

Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of a BioCeramic Sealer (iRoot SP) with AH Plus Sealer with Root Canal Dentin Using Three Different Techniques of Sealer Application: A Combined Dye Extraction and Scanning Electron Microscope Study

Clinical evaluation of Giomer and self-etch adhesive compared with nanofilled resin composite and etch-and-rinse adhesive – Results at 8 years

Some “sealants” seal—A scanning electron microscopy (SEM) investigation

In Vitro Analysis of Microbiologic Sealing of Two Different Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis Designs Cemented By Four Different Dental Cements

Degree of conversion of a methacrylate-based endodontic sealer: a micro-Raman spectroscopic study

[Comparative Study on Spectrophotometric and Visual Methods for Color Stability of Denture Base Resin].