Comparative HPLC enantioseparation on substituted phenylcarbamoylated cyclodextrin chiral stationary phases and mobile phase effects.

Chun Lin,Jun Fan,Wen-na Liu,Yi Tan,Wei-guang Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2014.05.032
IF: 3.571
2014-01-01
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Abstract:Two new cyclodextrin-derived chiral stationary phases with multiple urea linkages were prepared through the Staudinger reactions between aminopropyl silica gel and cyclodextrin derivatives, namely, heptakis(6-azido-6-deoxy-2,3-di-O-3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamoylated)-β-cyclodextrin and heptakis(6-azido-6-deoxy-2,3-di-O-3,5-dichlorophenylcarbamoylated)-β-cyclodextrin, respectively. HPLC separation behaviors toward 46 chiral analytes have been investigated under multimodal elution. They exhibited good separation performances for these analytes and also showed some complimentary enantioselectivity to each other, due to different electron-donating (methyl)/withdrawing (chlorine) groups in the phenylcarbamate moieties. Among these analytes, aromatic alcohols and N-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-derived carboxylic acids were better resolved on the π-basic chiral stationary phase than the π-acidic. The proton pump inhibitors, the 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists, and the analytes with carbonyl groups easily formed stereoselective interactions with the π-acidic chiral stationary phase, further leading to better enantioseparation. Elution order reversal for palonosetron and N-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) glutamine was observed in three chiral stationary phases, probably induced by the difference of phenylcarbamate groups. Moreover, mobile phase effects on retention behaviors of analytes have been studied in detail.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?