Enantioseparation Of Aromatic Alcohol And Aromatic Ester On Chiral Stationary Phases

Xuejun Zhang,Xiuzhu Xu,Baohai Shao,BaoChun Shen,Chunxiu Pan,Juanjuan Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0253-3820.2005.12.012
IF: 1.193
2005-01-01
Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Abstract:The enantioseparation of 1-phenyl-1-ethanol 1-phenyl propanol and 2-phenyl-propionic acid methyl ester was studied on two different kinds of chiral columns-self-prepared cellulose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) (CDMPC), Pirkle's type chiral stationary phase (CSP) (S,S)-Whelk-O 1, (R,R)-DNB-DPEDA chiral columns. The influence of the alcohol modifiers in mobile phase and solute structure on enantioseparation was studied., The difference of chiral recognition mechanism for these compounds on CDMPC and ( S, S) Whelk-O 1, (R,R)-DNB-DPEDA columns was compared. The results indicate that on (S,S)-Whelk-O 1 chiral column and (R,R)-DNB-DPEDA chiral column, the primary interaction is attraction between solute and stationary phase, while on CDMPC the inclusion is the dominant chiral recognition mechanism for the solutes, and the solute molecular volume size and its geometric shape must play a principle role in meeting the requirement for a stereoselective fit into the cellulose chiral cavity, which may be critical to the chiral recognition of these three solutes on CDMPC CSP. The hydrogen-bond interaction is not important for the chiral recognition.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?