Role of IL-17F T7488C Polymorphism in Carcinogenesis: a Meta-Analysis

Fen Yao,Shushan Yan,Xiaochen Wang,Denghui Shi,Jianye Bai,Feng Li,Beicheng Sun,Bin Qian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2171-y
2014-01-01
Tumor Biology
Abstract:Previous case-control studies on the association of interleukin-17F (IL-17F) T7488C polymorphism and cancer risk have yielded conflicting and inconclusive findings. We performed a meta-analysis by pooling all currently available data to acquire a more precise estimation of the association. A comprehensive literature screening from the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Wanfang databases was performed for eligible publications without language restrictions. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) were calculated. According to the inclusion criteria, a total of nine case-control studies with 3,034 cases and 3,694 controls were included. Overall, the pooled ORs showed that IL-17F T7488C polymorphism was associated with neither increased nor decreased risk of cancer. However, the IL-17F T7488C polymorphism exerted risk effect on cancer in population-based case-control studies when stratifying analysis by source of controls (C vs T OR = 1.24, 95 % CI, 1.10–1.40, pooled OR (POR) < 0.001; TC vs TT OR = 1.28, 95 % CI, 1.11–1.48, POR = 0.001; CC + TC vs TT OR = 1.29, 95 % CI, 1.12–1.48, POR < 0.001). Additionally, the variant genotypes of IL-17F T7488C could alter the risk of gastric cancer under the following comparisons (C vs T OR = 1.29, 95 % CI, 1.13–1.47, POR < 0.001; TC vs TT OR = 1.35, 95 % CI, 1.14–1.60, POR < 0.001; CC + TC vs TT OR = 1.35, 95 % CI, 1.15–1.58, POR < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis by sequential omission of single study did not materially alter the pooled findings. The present meta-analysis suggests that the IL-17F T7488C polymorphism may modify the risk of cancer, particularly gastric cancer. However, the precise association needs to be elucidated by more individual studies with sufficient statistical power.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?