Clinical outcomes of different types of allograft bone in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Min Li,Liu Limin,Song Yueming,Liu Hao,Tu Chongqi,Duan Hong,Zhou Chunguang,Gong Quan,Li Tao,Zeng Jiancheng,Pei Fuxing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1439.2012.05.002
2012-01-01
Abstract:Background: In the surgery of scoliosis,the clinical result mostly depends on the technique of bone graft. Because of the limitations of autograft bone, allograft bone is accepted widely. But are there any differences of clinical outcomes between allogous cancellous grafts and allogous cortical grafts after surgery? Objective: The aim of the study is to compare the clinical outcomes of different types of allograft bones in posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Methods: A retrospective control study was made in 107 cases of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The patients were treated with posterior instrumentation of screw-rod fixation system from January 2004 to January 2007 in our hospital. They were divided into two groups according to the different bone graft: allogous cancellous graft in 57 patients (group A) and allogous cortical graft in 50 patients (group B). The fusion rate, the change of postoperative Cobb's angle and the complications were compared between the two groups at 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months of follow-up. Results: There were no significant differences in terms of age, gender, Cobb's angle of main curve, the number of fused vertebrae and the volume of bone graft between the two groups. All the 107 patients were involved in the final analysis with an average follow-up of 39.8 months. The average correction rate at 1 week after surgery and at the final follow-up were 74.2% and 72.1%, respectively in all patients. There were no statistical differences of Cobb's angle and correction rate at 1 week after surgery, and Cobb's angle, correction rate and the loss of Cobb's angle at the final follow-up between the two groups (P>0.05). The bone fusion was observed in all the patients. The average fusion period was 15.0 months (range, 6 to 36 months) in group A and 15.9 months (range, 6 to 36 months) in group B. There was no statistical differenceof fusion rate at 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months postoperatively between the two groups (P>0.05). No screw loosening, screw fracture, rod fracture and pseudoarthrosis were found. Four patients (7.0%) in group A and three patients (6.0%) in group B suffered from leakage of cerebrospinal fluid. Infection happened in one patient (1.8%) in group A. The eight patients got rational treatment. Conclusions: There are similar mid-term and long-term clinical results of the two bone grafts in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. And the most outstanding advantage of allogous cortical chips graft is the extensive origin. Proper postoperative treatment and rehabilitation program should be made according to the mechanism of allograft bone fusion so as to keep the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.