Osteogenetic ability of calcium sulfate bone graft in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion

Zhang Jian,Liu Hai-ying,Wang Hui-min,Wang Bo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.45.024
2006-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To investigate the osteogenetic ability of calcium sulfate bone graft in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion by comparing with local compression bone. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with lumbar disorder underwent posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion with calcium sulfate bone graft in Department of spinal surgery, People's Hospital, Peking University from March 2004 to January 2005 were selected as subjects. In all patients, the left side of spine was treated with 1∶1 ratio of calcium sulfate and local bone, and the other side with local bone. According to JOA Score hcaving rejection or not, and Lenke Score, the clinical effect and fusion condition were evaluated respectively. RESULTS: Among the 27 patients, 26 cases were involved in the result analysis and 1 foreign case was lost. ①After 12 to 21 months of follow up (mean month: 15.3 months), surgical effect was good, the wound healed well; there was no rejection reaction in all patients. JOA score was more or less increased after operation (JOA score was separately 28.9, 28.6, 30.1 scores at 3, 6, 9 months after operation). ②Lenke scores of calcium sulfate side was higher than that of local bone side at the 3rd months, and there were significant differences (2.3±0.5), (1.9±0.4) scores, P < 0.05, but this difference was not found at 6 and 12 months after surgery (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Calcium sulfate plays the similar role to local compression bone when used as a graft extender for autograft in lumbar spine fusion, indicating calcium sulfate is a good bone graft substitutes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?