RETRACTED: Predictive and Prognostic Value of ER-α36 Expression in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Chemotherapy

Lanfang Yu,Wei Ke,Yanli Wang,Wei Ding,Bo Wang,Sui Huang,Jing Chen,Xiaoting Wang,Zhaoyi Wang,Peng Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2014.03.003
IF: 2.76
2014-01-01
Steroids
Abstract:Background: This study is to investigate the predictive and prognostic value of ER-alpha 36 expression in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy.Methods: ER-alpha 36 expression in 120 breast cancer tumors was assessed by an immunohistochemistry assay. All patients were divided into two groups according to the chemotherapy procedure: group A, 50 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery; group B, 70 patients who were performed adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery, and they all took at least two cycles of anthracycline-based and/or paclitaxel-based chemotherapy after surgery. The therapy effect on group A patients was evaluated two cycles later by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0 (RECIST 1.0).Results: ER-alpha 36 protein was positively expressed in 51 tumor specimens (42.5%) and no correlation was found between the expression of ER-alpha 36 and the expression of the full-length ER-alpha (ER-alpha 66), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), Ki-67, tumor sizes, and the numbers of lymph node metastasis. Patients with ER-a36 negative expression tumors treated with the neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a higher remission rate [partial response: stable: progressed (n) 25:3:1 vs. 11:9:1; P=0.009], a better response (86% vs. 52%; P=0.009), and a more favorable outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer patients compared to ER-alpha 36 positive patients and ER-alpha 36 negative expression was correlated with DFS in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Conclusions: ER-alpha 36 negative tumors benefit more from neoadjuvant chemotherapy and have better prognosis, which may warrant further studies with larger size of the sample. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?