Estrogen Receptor Expression: Possible Predictor of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients.
J. Wu,K. Shen,X. Chen,C. Chen,Z. Hu,G. Liu,G. Di,J. Lu,Z. Shao,Z. Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-09-1104
IF: 11.2
2009-01-01
Cancer Research
Abstract:BackgroundEstrogen receptor(ER) status has been found to correlate inversely to pathologic complete response (pCR) rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) of breast cancer. However, not all ER-positive breast cancer respond equally to NAC. The present study aimed to determine the relationship between different ER expression level with pCR in locally advanced breast cancer(LABC) patients who have received NAC.MethodsA retrospective study of 332 female unilateral LABC patients undergoing NAC was performed. All patients were confirmed as invasive breast cancer before treated with NAC, including VE (vinorelbine, epirubicin), CEF (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, fluorouracil) and PCb regimen (paclitaxel, carboplatin). All patients underwent radical surgery and pCR was defined as the absence of invasive breast cancer in both breast and axillary lymph nodes. ER status were checked using the established immunohistochemical(IHC) method and defined as negative, weakly positive(1+), medium positive(2+) and strongly positive(3+). Binary logistic regression was performed to determine the independent predictors of pCR.ResultsER negativity, 1+, 2+ and 3+ were found in 156, 108, 37 and 31 patients, of which 42(26.9%), 21(19.4%), 3(8.1%) and 1 patients(3.2%) have achieved pCR. Binary logistic regression showed that different ER expression level(P=0.021) and HER2 status(P=0.007, hazard ratio[HR] =2.557, 95% confidence interval[CI]: 1.297∼5.038) were significantly associated with the pCR rates. pCR was much more likely to occur in patients with ER-negative(P=0.024, HR =13.119, 95% CI: 1.402∼122.774) or ER 1+(P=0.025, HR=12.928, 95% CI: 1.388∼120.390) tumors than those with ER 3+ tumors.ConclusionER weekly positive patients also gain considerable benefit from NAC, which is probably less effective in ER strongly positive patients in terms of pCR. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 1104.