Prediction of Frequency-Specific Hearing Threshold Using Chirp Auditory Brainstem Response in Infants with Hearing Losses

Zheng-min Xu,Wen-xia Cheng,Zhi-hong Yao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.020
IF: 1.626
2014-01-01
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Abstract:Objectives: To investigate the clinical usefulness of the LS-chirp auditory brainstem response for estimation of behavioral thresholds in young children with mild to severe hearing losses.Methods: 68 infants (136 ears) aged 6-12 months (mean age = 9.2 months) with bilateral mild to severe hearing losses were studied at Children's Hospital of Fudan University. In all cases, the children were referred for LS-chirp ABR and visual reinforcement audiometric (VRA) measurements. The low-frequency band chirp (LF-chirp) thresholds (frequency band = 0.1-0.85 kHz) were compared to the average VRA thresholds (frequency band = 0.25-0.5 kHz), whereas the high-frequency band chirp (HF-chirp) thresholds (frequency band = 1-10 kHz) were compared to the average VRA thresholds (frequency band = 1-4 kHz) using statistical correlation coefficient values.Results: The LS-chirp ABR thresholds are very close to behavioral hearing levels. The mean differences between chirp-ABR and VRA thresholds were within 5 dB HL for all measurements. The smallest mean threshold difference (<3 dB HL) was obtained for the severe hearing loss group. The correlation coefficient values (r) were 0.97 at low-frequency and high-frequency bands. For each carrier frequency, the best correlations between chirp-ABR thresholds and VRA thresholds were obtained at VRA frequency of 0.25 kHz/LF-chirp (r = 0.98) and VRA frequency of 1 kHz/HF-chirp (r = 0.98).Conclusions: This study demonstrates the effectiveness using chirp-ABR predicted frequency-specific thresholds, especially of low and middle frequencies. LS-chirp ABR thresholds determined behavioral thresholds in patients with severe hearing losses were better than for mild hearing losses. The use of a chirp-ABR testing ensures higher sensitivity and accuracy than that of auditory stead-state evoked response (ASSR) for measuring frequency-specific thresholds in young children. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?