Triplet- Vs. Singlet-State Imposed Photochemistry. the Role of Substituent Effects on the Photo-Fries and Photodissociation Reaction of Triphenylmethyl Silanes

Zarkadis Antonios K.,Georgakilas Vassilios,Perdikomatis Gerasimos P.,Trifonov Anton,Gurzadyan Gagik G.,Skoulika Stavroula,Siskos Michael G.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/b502089a
2005-01-01
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences
Abstract:The photochemistry of three structurally very similar triphenylmethylsilanes 1 , 2 , 3 [ p -X–C_6H_4–CPh_2-SiMe_3: X = PhCO, 1 ; H, 2 ; Ph(OCH_2CH_2O)C, 3 ] is described by means of 248 and 308 nm nanosecond laser flash photolysis (ns-LFP), femtosecond LFP, EPR spectroscopy, emission spectroscopy (fluorescence, phosphorescence), ns-pulse radiolysis (ns-PR), photoproduct analysis studies in MeCN, and X-ray crystallographic analysis of the two key-compounds 1 and 2 . The photochemical behavior of 1 , 2 and 3 is discussed and compared with that of a fourth one, 4 , bearing on the p -position an amino group (X = Me_2N) and whose detailed photochemistry we reported earlier ( J. Org. Chem. , 2000, 65 , 4274–4280). Silane 1 undergoes on irradiation with 248 and 308 nm laser light a fast photodissociation of the C–Si bond giving the p -(benzoyl)triphenylmethyl radical ( 1 ·) with a rate constant of k _diss = 3 × 10^7 s^−1. The formation of 1 · is a one-quantum process and takes place via the carbonyl triplet excited state with high quantum yield ( Φ _rad = 0.9); the intervention of the triplet state is clearly demonstrated through the phosphorescence spectrum and quenching experiments with ferrocene ( k _q = 9.3 × 10^9 M^−1 s^−1), Et_3N (1.1 × 10^9 M^−1 s^−1), and styrene (3.1 × 10^9 M^−1 s^−1) giving quenching rate constants very similar to those of benzophenone. For comparative reasons radical 1 · was generated independently from p -(benzoyl)triphenylmethyl bromide via pulse radiolysis in THF and its absorption coefficient at λ _max = 340 nm was determined ( e = 27770 M^−1 cm^−1). We found thus that the p -PhCO-derivative 1 behaves similar to the p -Me_2N one 4 (the latter giving the p -(dimethylamino)triphenylmethyl radical with Φ _rad = 0.9), irrespective of their completely different ground state electronic properties. In contrast, compounds 2 , 3 that bear only the aromatic chromophore give by laser or lamp irradiation both, (i) radical products [Ph_3C· and p -Ph(OCH_2CH_2O)C–C_6H_4–C(·)Ph_2, respectively] after dissociation of the central C–Si bond ( Φ _rad = 0.16), and (ii) persistent photo-Fries rearrangement products (of the type of 5-methylidene-6-trimethylsilyl-1,3-cyclohexadiene) absorbing at 300–450 nm and arising from a 1,3-shift of the SiMe_3 group from the benzylic to the ortho -position of the aromatic ring ( Φ ≈ 0.85 for 2 ). Using fs-LFP on 2 we showed that the S_1 state recorded at 100 fs after the pulse decays on a time scale of 500 fs giving Ph_3C· through C–Si bond dissociation. In a second step and within the next 10 ps trityl radicals either escape from the solvent cage (the quantum yield of Ph_3C· formation Φ _rad = 0.16 was measured with ns-LFP), or undergo in-cage recombination to photo-Fries products. Thus, singlet excited states (S_1) of the aromatic organosilanes ( 2 , 3 ) prefer photo-Fries rearrangement products, while triplet excited states ( 1 , 4 ) favor free radicals. Both reactions proceed via a common primary photodissociation step (C–Si bond homolysis) and differentiate obviously in the multiplicity of the resulting geminate radical pairs; singlet radical pairs give preferably photo-Fries products following an in-cage recombination, while triplet radical pairs escape the solvent cage (MeCN). The results demonstrate the crucial role which is played by the chromophore which prescribes in a sense, (i) the multiplicity of the intervening excited state and consequently that of the resulting geminate radical pair, and (ii) the dominant reaction path to be followed: the benzophenone- and anilino-chromophore present in silanes 1 and 4 , respectively, impose effective intersystem crossing transitions ( k _isc = 10^11 s^−1 and 6 × 10^8 s^−1, respectively) leading to triplet states and finally to free radical products, while the phenyl chromophore in 2 and 3 , possessing ineffective isc ( k _isc = 6 × 10^6 s^−1) leads to photo-Fries product formation via the energetic high lying S_1 state [ ≈ 443 kJ mol^−1 (106 kcal mol^−1)].
What problem does this paper attempt to address?