Tian et al . reply

Yongjun Tian,Bo Xu,Dongli Yu,Yanming Ma,Yanbin Wang,Yingbing Jiang,Wentao Hu,Chengchun Tang,Yufei Gao,Kun Luo,Zhisheng Zhao,Li-Min Wang,Bin Wen,Julong He,Zhongyuan Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12621
IF: 64.8
2013-01-01
Nature
Abstract:Arising from N. Dubrovinskaia & L. Dubrovinsky Nature502,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12620(2013) Dubrovinskaia and Dubrovinsky 1 question the sub-grain structure and ultrahigh hardness of our nanotwinned cubic boron nitride (nt-cBN; ref. 2 ), and make the following assertions: (1) hardening related to nanotwinning in cBN has been known for tens of years, (2) our X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman results do not show the signatures of nanotwinning, (3) there are large wurtzite-structure boron nitride (wBN) domains present in our samples, and (4) our hardness values are unconvincing. We argue below that all these claims are incorrect.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?