Abstract:Background: To compare tissue response to two implant systems, featuring internal hexed connections with different designs. Methods: Patients enrolled in this randomized controlled trial were assigned to two groups. In Group 1, patients were treated with implants with a 5° conical internal hexed connection (Anyridge®, MegaGen, South Korea). In Group 2, patients were treated with implants with an internal hexed connection (Core®, Kristal, Italy). After implant placement and a provisionalisation period of 12 months, impressions were taken, stone casts were poured and digitised with a desktop scanner (D700®, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). In a digital environment, for each fixture, two values were collected at the buccal zenith: the height of the peri-implant mucosa (mucosal height; MH), calculated from the vestibular shoulder of the implant analogue to the upper gingival margin of the supra-implant tissue; and the width of the peri-implant mucosa (mucosal thickness; MT), calculated from the vestibular shoulder of the analogue to the external mucosa point perpendicular to the implant major axis. The mean and standard deviation for MH and MT, as well as their ratios, were calculated for each group; the sectors in which the implants were placed were also considered. Finally, correlation between MH, MT, connection type and sector was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient, with significance level set at 0.05, and a confidence interval (CI) set at 95%. Results: Data deriving from 188 implants placed in 104 patients were evaluated. The mean MH values were 3.32 (± 0.12) and 2.70 (± 0.16) mm for Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean MT values were 4.37 (± 0.16) and 3.93 (± 0.18) mm for Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Group 1 showed higher MH and MT values and a better ratio (1.50 ± 0.88) than Group 2 (1.81 ± 1.20). The MH, MT and MH/MT ratio were significantly influenced both by sector (p = 0.015) and group (p = 0.047). Conclusions: Within the limits of this study, the 5° connection implants supported a more extended tissue height and thickness at the buccal zenith, and a better ratio between them. Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered in Clinicaltrials.gov, with number NCT04160689, dated 13/11/2019.

Influence of Implant Position on Clinical Crown Length and Peri-implant Soft Tissue Dimensions at Implant-Supported Single Crowns Replacing Maxillary Central Incisors

The Two-Dimensional Size of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue in the Anterior Maxilla and Some Relevance: A 1- to 7-Year Cross-Sectional Study.

Clinical Effect of Nobel Biocare Angulated Screw Channel Crown Compared with Cement Crown in the Aesthetic Area: A Retrospective Cohort Study with a Mean 32 Months Follow-Up (range 12 to 70 Months).

Assessment research on the inter-proximal mesial papilla height of single implant-supported maxillary central incisor]

The Esthetic Outcome of Interproximal Papilla Between Implant-Restored Unilateral and Bilateral Maxillary Central Incisors: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study

Credibility and effectiveness research of papilla index after planting support single or crowns in aesthetic evaluation

Evaluation of the Papilla Level Surrounding Single-tooth Implants Crowns in the Esthetic Zone

A Correlative Study on the Implant Clinical Crown Height and the Occlusal Force in Maxillary First Molar

Dimensions of Posterior Implant Restorations Related to Intra‐Coronal Cantilever and Occlusal Forces: An In Vitro Study

[Effect of Crestal Rotated Flap on Esthetics of Peri-Implant Soft Tissues in Anterior Maxilla].

Impact of labially inclined implant axes on immediate implant placement and provisionalization in anterior maxilla: A prospective cohort study

Dimensions of hard and soft tissue around adjacent, compared with single-tooth, zirconia implants

[Affecting Factors for Height of Adjacent Gingival Papilla of Maxillary Central Incisor Single Implant].

Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Influence of Occlusal Surface Height on Stress Distribution Around Posterior Implant-Supported Single Crown

Esthetic outcome and alterations of soft tissue around single implant crowns: a 2-year prospective study.

Occlusal change in posterior implant-supported single crowns and its association with peri-implant bone level: a 5-year prospective study

Papillae Alterations Around Single-Implant Restorations in the Anterior Maxillae: Thick Versus Thin Mucosa.

A Clinical Study of the Outcomes Associated with Implant Single Crown in the Esthetic Area

Clinical, radiographic, and immunological evaluation of angulated screw-retained and cemented single-implant crowns in the esthetic region: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial

Influence of the implant-abutment connection on the ratio between height and thickness of tissues at the buccal zenith: a randomized controlled trial on 188 implants placed in 104 patients

Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: A 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study.