Abstract:Background Optimum management strategies for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors are undefined. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of continuing gefitinib combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with EGFR-mutation-positive advanced NSCLC with acquired resistance to first-line gefitinib.Methods The randomised, phase 3, multicentre IMPRESS study was done in 71 centres in 11 countries in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years with histologically confirmed, chemotherapynaive, stage IIIB-IV EGFR-mutation-positive advanced NSCLC with previous disease control with first-line gefitinib and recent disease progression (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1). Participants were randomly assigned (1: 1) by central block randomisation to oral gefitinib 250 mg or placebo once daily in tablet form; randomisation did not include stratification factors. All patients also received the platinum-based doublet chemotherapy cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) on the first day of each cycle. After completion of a maximum of six chemotherapy cycles, patients continued their randomly assigned treatment until disease progression or another discontinuation criterion was met. All study investigators and participants were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. The study has completed enrolment, but patients are still in follow-up for overall survival. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01544179.Findings Between March 29, 2012, and Dec 20, 2013, 265 patients were randomly assigned: 133 to the gefitinib group and 132 to the placebo group. At the time of data cutoff (May 5, 2014), 98 (74%) patients had disease progression in the gefitinib group compared with 107 (81%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0 . 86, 95% CI 0 . 65-1 . 13; p=0 . 27; median progression-free survival 5 . 4 months in both groups [95% CI 4 . 5-5 . 7 in the gefitinib group and 4 . 6-5 . 5 in the placebo group]). The most common adverse events of any grade were nausea (85 [64%] of 132 patients in the gefitinib group and 81 [61%] of 132 patients in the placebo group) and decreased appetite (65 [49%] and 45 [34%]). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or worse were anaemia (11 [8%] of 132 patients in the gefitinib group and five [4%] of 132 patients in the placebo group) and neutropenia (nine [7%] and seven [5%]). 37 (28%) of 132 patients in the gefitinib group and 28 (21%) of 132 patients in the placebo group reported serious adverse events.Interpretation Continuation of gefitinib after radiological disease progression on first-line gefitinib did not prolong progression-free survival in patients who received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as subsequent line of treatment. Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy remains the standard of care in this setting.

[Outcomes of Chemotherapy in Patients with EGFR Mutation-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer].

Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy Versus Placebo Plus Chemotherapy in Egfr-Mutation- Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Progression on First-Line Gefitinib (impress): A Phase 3 Randomised Trial

Influence of Chemotherapy on EGFR Mutation Status among Patients with Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer.

Superior Efficacy of Immunotherapy‐based Combinations over Monotherapy for EGFR‐mutant Non‐small Cell Lung Cancer Acquired Resistance to EGFR‐TKIs

Anti-angiogenic therapy or immunotherapy? A real-world study of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR/HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations

Chemotherapy Influence Egfr Mutation Status for Chinese Patients with Regionally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Correlation between EGFR mutation status and response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

[Role of EGFR Mutation Status in Patients with Stage III Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Chemoradiotherapy].

[Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy Subsequent EGFR-TKI in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with EGFR-TKI Acquired Resistance].

Non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of patient outcomes

Real-world Response and Outcomes in Patients with NSCLC with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations

Effect of EGFR amplification on survival of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Impact of EGFR amplification on survival of patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Final Overall Survival Results from a Randomised, Phase III Study of Erlotinib Versus Chemotherapy As First-Line Treatment of EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802).

EGFR mutations are associated with prognosis but not with the response to front-line chemotherapy in the Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Pemetrexed-based chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation: a multicenter study

Intrafamilial Child Sexual Abuse: Predictors of Postdisclosure Maternal Belief and Protective Action

Clinical outcomes of gefitinib and erlotinib in patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations: A pooled analysis of 438 patients

Intercalating and Maintenance Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Selected Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Unknown EGFR Status.

Sensitivity to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations

Outcomes of 27 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Resections of Paired Primary Pulmonary and Brain Metastatic Tumours: Is EGFR Negative Mutation of Brain Metastasis Bring More Benefit?