Impact of EGFR amplification on survival of patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Xin Gao,Xue-Wu Wei,Ming-Ying Zheng,Zhi-Hong Chen,Xu-Chao Zhang,Wen-Zhao Zhong,Jin-Ji Yang,Yi-Long Wu,Qing Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1630
2020-10-01
Journal of Thoracic Disease
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (<i>EGFR</i> ex20ins) is a common mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with <i>EGFR</i> ex20ins generally respond poor to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). <i>EGFR</i> ex20ins are often co-occurring with <i>EGFR</i> amplification. However, the impact of <i>EGFR</i> amplification on the survival of patients with <i>EGFR</i> ex20ins mutations has not been determined.METHODS: This is an observational longitudinal cohort study. A prospectively managed database included consecutive treatment-naïve adult patients with advanced NSCLC and <i>EGFR</i> ex20ins confirmed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between November 2017 and February 2019. The participants were enrolled from the database and extracted their clinical characteristics, treatment and clinical outcomes. NGS was used to establish whether <i>EGFR</i> amplification was present in tumor tissue. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between <i>EGFR</i> amplification and non-<i>EGFR</i> amplification groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the treatment used (EGFR-TKI or chemotherapy).RESULTS: Fifteen different <i>EGFR</i> ex20ins mutation subtypes were identified in the 39 patients included in the analysis, and the most common subtypes were p.A767_D770dup (25.6%), p.S768_D770dup (23.1%) and p.N771_H773dup (10.3%). Among 31 patients with <i>EGFR</i> ex20ins mutations and NGS data for tumor tissue, <i>EGFR</i> amplification was identified in 12 patients (38.7%) and there were no significant differences in clinical characteristics. Among 26 patients, there were no significant differences between the <i>EGFR</i> amplification (n=11) and non-<i>EGFR</i> amplification (n=15) groups in median OS (715 <i>vs</i>. 452 days, P=0.912). Among 20 patients administered chemotherapy, there were no significant differences between the <i>EGFR</i> amplification and non-<i>EGFR</i> amplification groups in median PFS (206 <i>vs</i>. 112 days, P=0.425). Among 24 patients administered an EGFR-TKI, median PFS was longer in the non-<i>EGFR</i> amplification group than in the <i>EGFR</i> amplification group (110 <i>vs</i>. 31 days, P=0.030).CONCLUSIONS: There is a tendency that <i>EGFR</i> amplification might be a poor predictor in <i>EGFR</i> ex20ins-positive NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs.
respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?