Abstract:This working paper is hosted by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress) and may not be commercially reproduced without the permission of the copyright holder. Summary. Randomized clinical trials are a powerful tool for investigating causal treatment effects, but in human trials there are oftentimes problems of noncompliance which standard analyses, such as the intention-to-treat or as-treated analysis, either ignore or incorporate in such a way that the resulting estimand is no longer a causal effect. One alternative to these analyses is the complier average causal effect (CACE) which estimates the average causal treatment effect among a subpopulation that would comply under any treatment assigned. We focus on the setting of a randomized clinical trial with crossover treatment noncompliance (e.g., control subjects could receive the intervention and intervention subjects could receive the control) and outcome nonresponse. In this article, we develop estimators for the CACE using multiple imputation methods, which have been successfully applied to a wide variety of missing data problems, but have not yet been applied to the potential outcomes setting of causal inference. Using simulated data we investigate the finite sample properties of these estimators as well as of competing procedures in a simple setting. Finally we illustrate our methods using a real randomized encouragement design study on the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine. 1. Introduction The focus of empirical studies in medicine is often to estimate the causal effect of treatments, where randomized clinical trials are considered the most acceptable tool for investigating these causal relationships. But in trials involving human subjects there are oftentimes problems of patient noncompliance, where the patient does not adhere to the treatment assigned. In addition, there is also the problem of nonignorable missing data, where the missing-data mechanism may depend on unobserved data. Standard methods and analyses either ignore these complications, which can lead to biased estimates of causal treatment effect, or account for them in such a way that the resulting estimand can no longer be considered a causal effect of treatment. A statistical framework for causal inference that deals with the issue of noncompliance is based on potential outcomes and was first introduced by Neyman (1923) for randomized studies and later developed by Rubin (1974, 1978) for nonrandomized studies and other forms of inference. Rubin's approach, sometimes referred to as the Ru-bin Causal Model (Holland, 1986), provides a framework for defining the parameters of interest and correctly attributing the …

Treating test-item nonresponse.

An analysis of different psychometric treatments of item nonresponse in the SACMEQ Reading test

Modeling Item-Level Heterogeneous Treatment Effects With the Explanatory Item Response Model: Leveraging Large-Scale Online Assessments to Pinpoint the Impact of Educational Interventions

Testing Whether Reported Treatment Effects are Unduly Dependent on the Specific Outcome Measure Used

Assessing the effect of questionnaire design on unit and item-nonresponse: evidence from an online experiment

Applying Unidimensional and Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models in Testlet-Based Reading Assessment

A Case Study of Nonresponse Bias Analysis in Educational Assessment Surveys

Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Item-Level Outcome Data: Insights from Item Response Theory

Comparing item response theory models for ranking incorrect response options

Nonresponse Bias Analysis in Longitudinal Studies: A Comparative Review with an Application to the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study

When You Say Nothing at All: The Predictive Power of Student Effort on Surveys

Treating Noneffortful Responses as Missing

Model-based Inference for Two-Stage Cluster Samples Subject to Nonignorable Item Nonresponse

Series 2-19-2009 Multiple Imputation Methods for Treatment Noncompliance and Nonresponse in Randomized Clinical Trials

Item response theory-based continuous test norming.

Is the author recognition test a useful metric for native and non-native English speakers? An item response theory analysis

Exploring Motivational Factors Associated With Test-Taking Effort Among Middle School Students

Are Individual Differences in Response to Intervention Influenced by the Methods and Measures Used to Define Response? Implications for Identifying Children With Learning Disabilities

Understanding Ability and Reliability Differences Measured with Count Items: The Distributional Regression Test Model and the Count Latent Regression Model

Test item response time and the response likelihood

No practice effect on the classification accuracy of the response time concealed information test