Abstract:Background: This study aimed to create a consensus statement on the indications, applications, and limitations of robotics in pediatric urology. Methods: After a panel and interactive discussion focused on pediatric robotics, a televoting with 10 questions was administered to 100 pediatric surgeons/urologists attending the joint meeting of the French Group of Pediatric Laparoscopy (GECI)/Italian Society of Videosurgery in Infancy (SIVI) in 2021. The results of televoting were analyzed electronically using Mentometer software. Results: Ninety-four percent of participants stated that the cutoff weight for robotics should be >10-15 kg. A minimum of 20-30 procedures should be performed to become confident in robotics (74%). Pediatric urology is the main field of application (73%) and pyeloplasty is the best indication for robotics (63%). Technical problems may happen intraoperatively in 1/10-15 cases (64%). The mean duration of robotic procedures ranges from 150 to 200 minutes (72%). The main drawbacks of robotics are high costs and limited development of miniaturized instruments (74%). Ninety-five percent believed that the costs of robotics may significantly drop with the availability of more robotic brands. The main advantages of robotics over laparoscopy include improved dexterity, easier suturing, and better ergonomics (100%), whereas the main disadvantage of sharing the robot with other specialties is the wearing out of instruments (100%). Conclusions: This is the first consensus statement, endorsed by the GECI and SIVI societies, on the use of robotics in pediatric urology. The need to introduce more robotic brands on the market to lower the costs and to develop miniaturized instruments to be adopted in infants less than 10 kg emerged. Pediatric urology is the main field of application of pediatric robotics, and robotic pyeloplasty is the most common procedure performed. Proctorship is needed for the first 20-30 procedures and technical problems may occur intraoperatively in 1/10-15 cases. The main advantages of robotics over laparoscopy are improved dexterity, easier suturing, and better surgeon ergonomics.

The First Decade of Robotic Surgery in Children

Robotic Approach to Paediatric Gastrointestinal Diseases: A Systematic Review

Small Scale, High Precision: Robotic Surgery in Neonatal and Pediatric Patients—A Narrative Review

Paediatric robotic surgery: a narrative review

Robotic surgeries in pediatric patients: an early experience in a single center

Establishment of a successful robotic pediatric general surgery practice

Collaborative Implementation of Robotic Surgery Into an Academic Pediatric Surgery Practice

Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for pediatric solid tumors: a systematic review of feasibility and current status

Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology: A Critical Appraisal of the GECI and SIVI Consensus of European Experts

International Attitudes of Early Adopters to Current and Future Robotic Technologies in Pediatric Surgery

Pediatric robotic urologic surgery-2014

Robotic-assisted surgery in pediatrics: what is evidence-based?—a literature review

Robot-Assisted Resection of Mesenteric Cysts in Pediatric Patients: a single-centered Retrospective study

Application and prospects of robotic surgery in children: a scoping review

The Future of Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology: Upcoming Technology and Evolution Within the Field

Pediatric Single-Incision Robotic Cholecystectomy: A 6-Year Update from a Single Institution

Robotic Pediatric Urologic Surgery-Clinical Anesthetic Considerations: A Comprehensive Review

Robotic-assisted pediatric thoracic and abdominal tumor resection: An Initial Multi-Center Review

Robotics in Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery: What, Why and When?

Total robot-assisted choledochal cyst excision using da Vinci surgical system in pediatrics: Report of 10 cases

Our initial experience with robotic hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery