Abstract:Objective: To assess the feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy. Background: The development of minimally invasive surgery has led to an increase in the use of laparoscopic hepatectomy. However, laparoscopic hepatectomy remains technically challenging and is not widely developed. Robotic surgery represents a recent evolution in minimally invasive surgery that is being used increasingly for complex minimally invasive surgical procedures. Herein, we report our initial experience with robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in 13 consecutive patients. Patients and methods: Between April and July 2009, 13 consecutive patients underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomies for benign and malignant hepatic diseases. Major hepatectomies were performed in 9 patients, left lateral sectionectomies in 4 patients. Eight major hepatectomies were for malignant diseases and 5 hepatectomies (1 left hepatectomy and 4 left lateral sectionectomies) were for benign diseases. All the robotic-assisted hepatectomy procedures were performed anatomically with hilum dissection. Prior to starting the parenchymal transaction, vascular control of the portal vessels was carried out whenever possible. These robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomies were compared with 20 traditional laparoscopic hepatectomies and 32 open resections that were contemporaneous and cohort-matched. Results: All 13 robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomies were performed successfully in the manner of pure laparoscopic resection. No conversion to laparotomy or hand-assisted laparoscopic resection occurred. Despite its longer operative time (338 minutes) and higher hospital cost ($12,046), robotic liver surgery compared favorably with traditional laparoscopic hepatectomy and open resection in blood loss (280 vs. 350, 470 mL), transfusion requirement (0 vs. 3 of 20, 4 of 32), use of the Pringle maneuver (0 vs. 3 of 20, 6 of 32) and overall operative complications (7.8% vs. 10%,12.5%). Neither ascites nor transient hepatic decompensation occurred in the robotic group. The surgical margins in all 8 patients with malignant lesions were negative and as yet, no intrahepatic recurrences or metastases have been observed in the robotic group. The mean postoperative stay was shorter with the traditional laparoscopic procedure (5.2 days) than with robotic (6.7 days)or open surgery (9.6 days). Conversions from traditional laparoscopic to open and hand-assisted laparoscopic resection occurred in 2 patients (10.0%) who underwent right hemihepatectomy and left hepatectomy, respectively. Conclusions: These preliminary results show that robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy is safe and feasible with a much lower complication and conversion rate than traditional laparoscopic hepatectomy or open resection. The robotic surgical system may broaden the indications for laparoscopic hepatactomy, and it enabled the surgeon to perform precise laparoscopic liver resection which required hylum dissection, hepatocaval dissection, endoscopic suturing, and microanastamosis. However, more long-term, evidence-based outcomes will be necessary to prove its efficacy, and further research on its cost-effectiveness is still required.

Our initial experience with robotic hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery

Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: from Laparoscopic Surgery to Da Vinci Robotic Surgical System

Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study

Institutional First 100 Case Experience and Outcomes of Robotic Hepatectomy for Liver Tumors

Current progress in robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery at a high‐volume center

Current status and future perspectives of robotic liver surgery

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience

Initial Experience of Da Vinci Robotic Thoracic Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University.

Early experiences in robotic single‐site plus one port platform for complex hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery

Robotic liver surgery: preliminary experience in a tertiary hepato-biliary unit

Initial experience with a robotic hepatectomy program at a high-volume laparoscopic center: single-center experience and surgical tips

Robotic hepatectomy for benign and malignant liver tumors

Single-Institution Early Experience and Learning Curve with Robotic Liver Resections

Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Primary Hepatobiliary Tumors—Possibilities and Limitations

Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience

Robotic approach to hepatobiliary surgery

State of the Art in Robotic Hepatobiliary Surgery

Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures

Robotic vs. laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-center analysis of 600 consecutive patients in 6 years

Robotic thoracic surgery using the single-port robotic system: Initial experience with more than 100 cases