A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perforator-Pedicled Propeller Flaps in Lower Extremity Defects: Identification of Risk Factors for Complications
Wei,Jiang-Dong Ni,Zhong-Gen Dong,Li-Hong Liu,Xi Liu,Ping Peng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000002392
2016-01-01
Abstract:Sir: We read with great interest the article entitled “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perforator-Pedicled Propeller Flaps in Lower Extremity Defects: Identification of Risk Factors for Complications” by Bekara et al. (Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:314–331). We appreciate the authors’ significant study. Despite widespread enthusiasm for the perforator-pedicled propeller flap in the current era of perforator flaps, the flap’s complications remain a main problem. In addition to three patient factors proposed by the authors in this article, other potential risk factors are also very important with regard to complications. The authors reviewed many factors obtained from 40 studies included in this study. However, the flap factors, except for the surface area, had not been analyzed in detail. In a study published by us, we concluded that the probability of partial necrosis increased significantly when the top edge is located in the upper one-ninth of the calf, when the length-to-width ratio of the flap was 5:1 or more, or when the width of the perforator-plus sural fasciocutaneous flap was 8 cm or more.1 The perforator-plus flaps2 in our study, with an identifiable and dominant arterial supply and venous drainage from the perforator at the base, possessed characteristics similar to the perforator-pedicled propeller flap. Therefore, we speculate that the flap factors might be closely associated with the complications of the perforator-pedicled propeller flap. Besides the flap factors mentioned above, the width of the perforator-pedicled propeller flap around the perforator pedicle and the length of the flap may influence the arterial supply and venous drainage in large perforator-pedicled propeller flaps, by means of influencing the number of included linking vessels between perforasomes3 or choke vessels between angiosomes.4 In this study by Bekara et al., five types of flaps were included and analyzed. Each flap itself has peculiar characteristics regarding vasculature. For example, the vascularity of the peroneal artery perforator flap includes the peroneal artery perforator at the pivot point and its anastomoses with other peroneal artery perforators and with the perforators from other source arteries (including the lateral sural artery and the superficial sural artery). Nonetheless, the vascularity of the medial sural artery perforator flap includes only the medial sural artery perforator and its potential anastomoses with other perforators from the medial sural artery (Fig. 1). In addition, the number of true anastomoses in these flaps is different.4 A systematic meta-analysis of each perforator-pedicled propeller flap will be more significant for clinical application, and will offer plastic surgeons the optimal scenario.Fig. 1.: Radiograph showing the integument of the lower leg perfused with a barium sulfate–latex mixture. A peroneal artery perforator flap is outlined with a red dotted line. Horizontal and longitudinal yellow dotted lines represent the level of the knee joint and posterior midline of the calf, respectively. Arteries and perforators of the calf are marked with numbers. 1 to 7, perforators from the peroneal artery; 8, accompanying arteries of the sural nerve; 9, lateral superficial sural artery; 10 to 13, perforators from the lateral sural artery; 14 to 17, perforators from the medial sural artery.ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This letter is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81401803) and the Hunan Province Science and Technology Plan Project (no. 2014TT2016). DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this communication. Jian-Wei Wei, M.D.Jiang-Dong Ni, M.D.Zhong-Gen Dong, M.D.Li-Hong Liu, M.D.Xi Liu, M.M.S.Ping Peng, M.M.S.Department of OrthopedicsSecond Xiangya HospitalCentral South UniversityChangsha, People’s Republic of China