Clinical outcomes of perforator-based propeller flaps versus free flaps in soft tissue reconstruction for lower leg and foot trauma: a retrospective single-centre comparative study

Mitsutoshi Ota,Makoto Motomiya,Naoya Watanabe,Kohei Shimoda,Norimasa Iwasaki

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07433-x

IF: 2.562

2024-04-16

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract:Abstract Background The efficacy and safety of perforator-based propeller flaps (PPF) versus free flaps (FF) in traumatic lower leg and foot reconstructions are debated. PPFs are perceived as simpler due to advantages like avoiding microsurgery, but concerns about complications, such as flap congestion and necrosis, persist. This study aimed to compare outcomes of PPF and FF in trauma-related distal lower extremity soft tissue reconstruction. Methods We retrospectively studied 38 flaps in 33 patients who underwent lower leg and foot soft tissue reconstruction due to trauma at our hospital from 2015 until 2022. Flap-related outcomes and complications were compared between the PPF group (18 flaps in 15 patients) and the FF group (20 flaps in 18 patients). These included complete and partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, delayed osteomyelitis, and the coverage failure rate, defined as the need for secondary flaps due to flap necrosis. Results The coverage failure rate was 22% in the PPF group and 5% in the FF group, with complete necrosis observed in 11% of the PPF group and 5% of the FF group, and partial necrosis in 39% of the PPF group and 10% of the FF group, indicating no significant difference between the two groups. However, venous congestion was significantly higher in 72% of the PPF group compared to 10% of the FF group. Four PPFs and one FF required FF reconstruction due to implant/fracture exposure from necrosis. Additionally, four PPFs developed delayed osteomyelitis post-healing, requiring reconstruction using free vascularized bone graft in three out of four cases. Conclusions Flap necrosis in traumatic lower-leg defects can lead to reconstructive failure, exposing implants or fractures and potentially causing catastrophic outcomes like osteomyelitis, jeopardizing limb salvage. Surgeons should be cautious about deeming PPFs as straightforward and microsurgery-free procedures, given the increased complication rates compared to FFs in traumatic reconstruction. Data access statement The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

rheumatology,orthopedics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper mainly discusses the clinical outcomes of perforator-based propeller flaps (PPF) and free flaps (FF) in soft tissue reconstruction after lower limb and foot trauma. The study retrospectively analyzed the results of 38 flap surgeries in 33 patients between 2015 and 2022, including 18 PPF flaps in 15 patients and 20 FF flaps in 18 patients.

The study found that although PPF is considered to be simple and does not require microsurgery, it carries a higher risk of complications such as flap congestion and necrosis. The flap failure rate (requiring secondary flap) in the PPF group was 22%, compared to 5% in the FF group, with no significant difference between the two groups. However, the incidence of venous congestion in the PPF group was as high as 72%, significantly higher than the 10% in the FF group. In addition, 4 cases in the PPF group required FF repair due to implant or fracture exposure caused by necrosis, while there was only 1 case in the FF group. There were also 4 cases in the PPF group that developed delayed osteomyelitis after healing, 3 of which required free vascularized bone grafting.

The conclusion of the paper indicates that although PPF has advantages in certain aspects, its complication rate is higher than that of FF in trauma-related reconstruction, which may lead to serious consequences such as osteomyelitis and pose a threat to limb salvage. Therefore, surgeons should carefully consider the potential risks when choosing PPF.