Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To study the effectiveness of computer assisted pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic spinal posterior fixation.METHODS:Between December 2009 and March 2011, 51 patients underwent pedicle screw fixation using the computer assisted navigation (navigation group), while 41 patients underwent the conventional technique (traditional group). All patients had osteoporosis under the dual-energy X-rays absorptiometry. There was no significant difference in age, gender, bone mineral density, involved segment, preoperative complications, and other general status between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The amount of blood loss, the operation time, the rate of the pedicle screw re-insertion, and the postoperative complication were observed. The state of the pedicle screw location was assessed by CT postoperatively with the Richter's classification and the fusion state of the bone graft was observed using three-dimensional (3-D) CT scans during follow-up.RESULTS:A total of 250 screws were inserted in navigation group, and 239 were inserted successfully at first time while the other 11 screws (4.4%) were re-inserted. A total of 213 screws were inserted in traditional group, and 190 were successful at first time while 23 screws (10.8%) were re-inserted. There was significant difference in the rate of screws re-insertion between 2 groups (chi2 = 6.919, P = 0.009). Both the amount of blood loss and the operation time in navigation group were significantly less than those in traditional group (P < 0.05). According to Richter's classification for screw location, the results were excellent in 240 screws, good in 10 screws in navigation group; the results were excellent in 191 screws, good in 21 screws, and poor in 1 screw in traditional group. Significant difference was noticed in the screw position between 2 groups (chi2 = 7.566, P = 0.023). The patients were followed up (7.8 +/- 1.5) months in navigation group and (8.7 +/- 1.5) months in traditional group. No loosening, extraction, and breakage of the pedicle screw occurred in navigation group, and all these patients had successful fusion within 6 months postoperatively. While in traditional group, successful fusion was shown in the other patients by 3-D CT, except the absorption of bone graft was found in only 1 patient at 6 months after operation. And then, after braking by adequate brace and enhancing the anti-osteoporotic therapy, the bone graft fused at 9 months postoperatively.CONCLUSION:The computer assisted navigating pedicle screw insertion could effective reduce the deviation or re-insertion of the screws, insuring the maximum stability of each screw, mean while it can reduce the exposure time and blood loss, avoiding complication. The computer assisted navigation would be a useful technique which made the pedicle screw fixation more safe and stable in patients with osteoporosis.

[Clinical efficiency of computer-assisted pedicle screw placement versus conventional method: a meta-analysis].

Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic Spine: a Randomized Comparison Study of Computer-Assisted Navigation and Conventional Techniques.

Computer Navigation Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Navigation for Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement: a Meta-Analysis

[Comparison of the Effect of Navigation Template Assisted Spinal Pedicle Fixation and Traditional Pedicle Screw Fixation:A Meta-analysis].

CLINICAL APPLICATION OF PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION UNDER GUIDANCE OF COMPUTER ASSISTED NAVIGATION IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOPOROSIS

Comparison of the Accuracy Between Robot-Assisted and Conventional Freehand Pedicle Screw Placement: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between robot-assisted and freehand pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Evaluating robotic pedicle screw placement against conventional modalities: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Based on Preoperative Computed Tomography Versus Intraoperative Data Set Acquisition for Spinal Navigation System

Is robot-assisted pedicle screw placement really superior to conventional surgery? An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Comparison of the Clinical Accuracy of Cervical (C2-C7) Pedicle Screw Insertion Assisted by Fluoroscopy, Computed Tomography-Based Navigation, and Intraoperative Three-Dimensional C-arm Navigation.

Comparison of robotic or computer-assisted navigation versus fluoroscopic freehand techniques in the accuracy of posterior cervical screw placement during cervical spine surgery: a meta-analysis

Surgical Precision and Efficiency of a Novel Electromagnetic System Compared to a Robot-Assisted System in Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement of Endo-LIF

Computer Navigation Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement

The safety and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation for spine disease

Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion among 3 Image-Guided Navigation Systems: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion Among 4 Guided Technologies in Spine Surgery

Safety and Accuracy of Cannulated Pedicle Screw Placement in Scoliosis Surgery: a Comparison of Robotic-Navigation, O-arm-based Navigation, and Freehand Techniques

Accuracy of digital orthopedic three-dimensional reconstruction for thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement

Comparison of the pedicle screws placement between electronic conductivity device and normal pedicle finder in posterior surgery of scoliosis.

[Clinical Contrast of Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation Assisted by C-arm Fluoroscopy or 3D Navigation System].