Abstract:BackgroundTo assess the prognostic significance of positive circumferential resection margin on overall survival in patients with esophageal cancer, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed.MethodsStudies were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Survival data were extracted from eligible studies to compare overall survival in patients with a positive circumferential resection margin with patients having a negative circumferential resection margin according to the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) criteria and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) criteria. Survival data were pooled with hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A random-effects model meta-analysis on overall survival was performed.ResultsThe pooled HRs for survival were 1.510 (95% CI, 1.329–1.717; p < 0.001) and 2.053 (95% CI, 1.597–2.638; p < 0.001) according to the RCP and CAP criteria, respectively. Positive circumferential resection margin was associated with worse survival in patients with T3 stage disease according to the RCP (HR, 1.381; 95% CI, 1.028–1.584; p = 0.001) and CAP (HR, 2.457; 95% CI, 1.902–3.175; p < 0.001) criteria, respectively. Positive circumferential resection margin was associated with worse survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy according to the RCP (HR, 1.676; 95% CI, 1.023–2.744; p = 0.040) and CAP (HR, 1.847; 95% CI, 1.226–2.78; p = 0.003) criteria, respectively.ConclusionsPositive circumferential resection margin is associated with poor prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer, particularly in patients with T3 stage disease and patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. To assess the prognostic significance of positive circumferential resection margin on overall survival in patients with esophageal cancer, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Studies were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Survival data were extracted from eligible studies to compare overall survival in patients with a positive circumferential resection margin with patients having a negative circumferential resection margin according to the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) criteria and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) criteria. Survival data were pooled with hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A random-effects model meta-analysis on overall survival was performed. The pooled HRs for survival were 1.510 (95% CI, 1.329–1.717; p < 0.001) and 2.053 (95% CI, 1.597–2.638; p < 0.001) according to the RCP and CAP criteria, respectively. Positive circumferential resection margin was associated with worse survival in patients with T3 stage disease according to the RCP (HR, 1.381; 95% CI, 1.028–1.584; p = 0.001) and CAP (HR, 2.457; 95% CI, 1.902–3.175; p < 0.001) criteria, respectively. Positive circumferential resection margin was associated with worse survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy according to the RCP (HR, 1.676; 95% CI, 1.023–2.744; p = 0.040) and CAP (HR, 1.847; 95% CI, 1.226–2.78; p = 0.003) criteria, respectively. Positive circumferential resection margin is associated with poor prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer, particularly in patients with T3 stage disease and patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

[Value of Surgical Margin in Directing the Treatment of Early Laryngeal Carcinoma after Partial Laryngectomy].

Prognostic Effect of Postoperative Resection-Margin Status for Intraoperative Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer

Prognostic Improvement of Reexcision for Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Factors Influencing Postoperative Prognosis in Patients with Hypopharyngeal and Laryngeal Carcinoma

Research Progress Regarding Surgical Margins, Molecular Margins, and Prognosis of Laryngeal Carcinoma

[The relationship between the surgical margin and local recurrence of laryngeal carcinoma].

The Value of Lymph Node Ratio in the Prediction of Rectal Cancer Patient Survival after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.

Narrow-Margin Hepatectomy Resulted in Higher Recurrence and Lower Overall Survival for R0 Resection Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Effect of Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Resected Advanced Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

A study of the association between local recurrence and surgical margins in vertical partial laryngectomy for T1 glottic squamous cell carcinoma.

Association of the Specimen and Tumor Bed Margin Status with Local Recurrence and Survival in Open Partial Laryngectomy

[The Clinical Significance of Molecular Findings in Surgically Resected Margins of the Primary Tumor Laryngeal Carcinoma].

Prognostic Significance of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

[Retrospective Analysis of 760 Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Open Laryngeal Function-Preserving Operations].

The impact of margins in laryngeal cancer patients treated with transoral laser microsurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical Relevance of Resection Margins in Patients with Total Laryngectomy or Laryngopharyngectomy

Postoperative pathological findings and prognosis of early laryngeal and pharyngeal cancer treated with transoral surgery

Negative surgical margin improved long-term survival of colorectal cancer liver metastases after hepatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Treatment of the Positive Surgical Margin Following Radical Prostatectomy.

Surgery on Laryngeal Carcinoma--retrospective Analysis of 205 Cases

Analysis of surgical methods and clinical analysis of its long-term effect of laryngeal carcinoma