Clinical Relevance of Resection Margins in Patients with Total Laryngectomy or Laryngopharyngectomy

Simone E. Bernard,Cornelia G. F. van Lanschot,Aniel Sewnaik,Maria A. J. de Ridder,Jose A. Hardillo,Dominiek A. Monserez,Robert J. Baatenburg de Jong,Senada Koljenović

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16112038

2024-05-28

Cancers

Abstract:Background: Laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer is complex and resection margins are therefore constrained. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of resection margins in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients treated with a total laryngectomy (TL) or laryngopharyngectomy (TLP) for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC and HSCC, respectively). Within the groups primary LSCC, recurrent LSCC, primary HSCC, and recurrent HSCC the relationship between the status of the resection margin according to the Royal Collage of Pathology and the recurrence and survival rates were investigated. Results: Positive resection margins were found in 54% for primary LSCC, 29% for recurrent LSCC, 62% for primary HSCC, and 44% for recurrent HSCC. For primary and recurrent LSCC, there was a linear association between total recurrence and narrowing margins (p = 0.007 resp. p = 0.008). Multivariate survival analysis for primary and recurrent LSCC showed a significantly worse disease free and disease-specific survival in case of positive margins compared to clear margins. Conclusion: Similar survival rates were recorded for close and clear margins for primary and recurrent LSCC. This may suggest that a margin > 5 mm is not clinically relevant in terms of survival. Therefore, a margin of 1–5 mm should be accepted in certain subsites. Margins < 1 mm are related to significantly worse outcomes and should be avoided.

oncology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the clinical relevance of resection margins defined by the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) in patients with laryngeal cancer or hypopharyngeal cancer undergoing total laryngectomy (TL) or total laryngo - hypopharyngectomy (TLP). Specifically, the study aims to explore the relationships between different types of resection margins (clear, close, positive) and tumor recurrence rate and survival rate, especially the influence in primary and recurrent laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC).

### Research Background
- The complex anatomical structures of laryngeal cancer and hypopharyngeal cancer make it challenging to achieve a resection margin greater than 5 millimeters.
- According to the RCP's definition, resection margins are divided into: clear (>5 mm), close (1 - 5 mm), and positive (<1 mm).
- Currently, there is limited evidence regarding the clinical significance of these resection margins in laryngeal cancer and hypopharyngeal cancer surgeries.

### Research Methods
- A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients who received TL or TLP treatment at the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, from January 2008 to July 2017.
- Patients were divided into four groups: primary LSCC, recurrent LSCC, primary HSCC, and recurrent HSCC.
- The clinical and pathological characteristics of patients, as well as the relationship between resection margin status and recurrence and survival rates, were analyzed.

### Main Findings
- For primary and recurrent LSCC, narrow resection margins were significantly associated with a higher overall recurrence rate (p = 0.007 and p = 0.008).
- Multivariate survival analysis showed that positive resection margins were significantly associated with poorer disease - free survival (DFS) and disease - specific survival (DSS).
- For primary and recurrent LSCC, there was no significant difference in survival rate between close and clear resection margins, which may imply that a margin greater than 5 millimeters is not important in terms of survival.
- Resection margins less than 1 millimeter were associated with a significantly poorer prognosis and should be avoided as much as possible.

### Conclusions
- This study shows that for primary and recurrent LSCC, close and clear resection margins are similar in terms of survival rate, so a 1 - 5 millimeter margin can be acceptable in some sub - sites.
- Resection margins less than 1 millimeter should be strictly avoided because they are associated with a significantly poorer prognosis.
- These findings are helpful for guiding clinical practice, especially in surgical decision - making in the anatomically complex laryngeal and hypopharyngeal regions.

### Keywords
- Laryngeal cancer; Hypopharyngeal cancer; Resection margin; Squamous cell carcinoma; Royal College of Pathologists

Through this study, the authors hope to provide clinicians with a scientific basis for the management of resection margins in laryngeal cancer and hypopharyngeal cancer surgeries, thereby improving the prognosis of patients.