Abstract:The UK NHS has a number of important strengths. Its costs are relatively low compared to the health care systems of other developed countries due in part to cash limited central budgeting. It is extremely popular with the electorate and surveys show overall satisfaction with the NHS despite some dissatisfaction with waiting lists and a public perception of underfunding. The NHS model of general medical care provided by independent contractors has been acclaimed as "a British success" (General Medical Services Council, 1983). The role of the UK GP combines providing primary care and acting as a gatekeeper to secondary care. This increases equitable access to care for the population and assists in cost containment. As a model, it is currently being emulated in other countries including Sweden and US Health Maintenance Organizations but, as in these countries, the UK primary care model has been evaluated poorly. There are of course continuing weaknesses in the UK health care system. There is insufficient knowledge upon which to base health care services and increase efficiency. In the future, if a knowledge-based health care service is to be created, a considerable amount of research and evaluation is required to identify "what works" in health care (i.e., what is effective) and also the cost effective ways of altering provider behaviour to maximise the amount of health gain which can be achieved using a limited budget. The NHS reforms created a lot of enthusiasm and energy but its effects are difficult to disentangle from the simultaneous increases in funding. There is little evidence from the UK or elsewhere that competition in health care produces efficiency or improvements in resource allocation. Evaluation is required to identify which of the reforms are increasing efficiency. Competition needs to be used with caution and recognised as a mean and not an end in itself. It is remarkable how both clinical practice and health policy reform, in the UK and elsewhere, is poorly evaluated. Medical practice varies substantially locally, regionally, and internationally, e.g., patients with similar age and stage of cancer receive very different levels of radiotherapy across Europe. For most interventions, the appropriate level of treatment may be asserted but is not based on cost effectiveness knowledge. Health policy analysts, like clinicians, make assertions about competition and other health care reforms which are value- rather than knowledge-based. Both groups of decision-makers should be more cautious, informing their choices with research rather than relying on unsubstantiated optimism!

Local Authorities' Scrutiny Committees Must Consider Financial Issues if They Want to Reject Health Service Changes

Health department lacks grip on spending and clinical negligence payouts, MPs warn

How Cure the NHS Became the True Professionals at Mid Staffs.

Audit Scotland: NHS services may need to be withdrawn to reform care

Devolution of Health Budget to Councils Could See NHS Spending Eroded, Expert Warns

NHS England’s Plans to Cut Specialised Service Providers from 270 to under 30 Might Not Be “sensible,” Conference Hears

Should local research ethics committees monitor research they have approved?

Nhs Chief Tells Politicians to Embrace Hospital Closures to Improve Services for Patients

My goal for the independent investigation into the performance of the health service in England

Universal coverage and cost control: the United Kingdom National Health Service

Regulation of health facilities: often criticised but seldom evaluated

An economic analysis of the limits of market based reforms in the English NHS

Declaring a health and care emergency

'Inglan is a bitch': hostile NHS charging regulations contravene the ethical principles of the medical profession

Regarding general practice: an appeal to the new UK Government

Expert Questions Whether NHS Can Be Transformed Without Further Upheaval.

More Than A Third Of Ccgs And Trusts Fail To Show Value For Money, Says Public Spending Watchdog

Commissioning for health improvement following the 2012 health and social care reforms in England: what has changed?

Assessment and Qualitative Comparative Analysis of English Local Authority Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategies to Improve Health under Austerity Conditions, 2013–2017

NHS in England Balances Books, but Local Deficits Mean Worse Care in Some Areas, Says Report

Local Government Modernization and the Views of Chief Financial Officers