Low‐dose or Standard‐dose Proton Pump Inhibitors for Maintenance Therapy of Gastro‐oesophageal Reflux Disease: a Cost‐effectiveness Analysis

JHS You,ACM Lee,SCY Wong,FKL Chan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01526.x
IF: 9.524
2003-01-01
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Abstract:Background: Studies on the use of low-dose proton pump inhibitor for the maintenance therapy of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease have shown that it might be comparable with standard-dose proton pump inhibitor treatment and superior to standard-dose histamine-2 receptor antagonist therapy.Aim: To compare the impact of standard-dose histamine-2 receptor antagonist, low-dose proton pump inhibitor and standard-dose proton pump inhibitor treatment for the maintenance therapy of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease on symptom control and health care resource utilization from the perspective of a public health organization in Hong Kong.Methods: A Markov model was designed to simulate, over 12 months, the economic and clinical outcomes of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients treated with standard-dose histamine-2 receptor antagonist, low-dose proton pump inhibitor and standard-dose proton pump inhibitor. The transition probabilities were derived from the literature. Resource utilization was retrieved from a group of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients in Hong Kong. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine the robustness of the model.Results: The standard-dose proton pump inhibitor strategy was associated with the highest numbers of symptom-free patient-years (0.954 years) and quality-adjusted life-years gained (0.999 years), followed by low-dose proton pump inhibitor and standard-dose histamine-2 receptor antagonist. The direct medical cost per patient in the standard-dose proton pump inhibitor group (US$904) was lower than those of the low-dose proton pump inhibitor and standard-dose histamine-2 receptor antagonist groups.Conclusions: The standard-dose proton pump inhibitor strategy appears to be the most effective and least costly for the maintenance management of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Hong Kong.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?