On-demand Versus Continuous Maintenance Treatment With a Proton Pump Inhibitor for Mild Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study

Da Hyun Jung,Young Hoon Youn,Hye-Kyung Jung,Seung Young Kim,Cheal Wung Huh,Cheol Min Shin,Jung-Hwan Oh,Kyu Chan Huh,Moo In Park,Suck Chei Choi,Ki Bae Kim,Seon-Young Park,Joong Goo Kwon,Yu Kyung Cho,Jung Ho Park,Jeong Eun Shin,Eun Jeong Gong,Jae Hak Kim,Su Jin Hong,Hyun Jin Kim,Sam Ryong Jee,Ju Yup Lee,Kee Wook Jung,Hee Man Kim,Kwang Jae Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm23130
2023-10-30
Abstract:Background/aims: It remains unclear which maintenance treatment modality is most appropriate for mild gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We aimed to compare on-demand treatment with continuous treatment using a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in the maintenance treatment for patients with non-erosive GERD or mild erosive esophagitis. Methods: Patients whose GERD symptoms improved after 4 weeks of standard dose PPI treatment were prospectively enrolled at 25 hospitals. Subsequently, the enrolled patients were randomly assigned to either an on-demand or a continuous maintenance treatment group, and followed in an 8-week interval for up to 24 weeks. Results: A total of 304 patients were randomized to maintenance treatment (continuous, n = 151 vs on-demand, n = 153). The primary outcome, the overall proportion of unwillingness to continue the assigned maintenance treatment modality, failed to confirm the non-inferiority of on-demand treatment (45.9%) compared to continuous treatment (36.1%). Compared with the on-demand group, the GERD symptom and health-related quality of life scores significantly more improved and the overall satisfaction score was significantly higher in the continuous treatment group, particularly at week 8 and week 16 of maintenance treatment. Work impairment scores were not different in the 2 groups, but the prescription cost was less in the on-demand group. Serum gastrin levels significantly elevated in the continuous treatment group, but not in the on-demand group. Conclusions: Continuous treatment seems to be more appropriate for the initial maintenance treatment of non-erosive GERD or mild erosive esophagitis than on-demand treatment. Stepping down to on-demand treatment needs to be considered after a sufficient period of continuous treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?