Abstract:Objective To investigate the appropriate setting up of normal reference ranges of lymphocyte subsets in some flow cytometry laboratories and to study the effects of different flow cytometers and various reagents by different manufacturers on the analysis of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets. Methods Three FCM labs (named A, B and C) in Beijing region were selected representing 3 commonly used flow cytometers (Beckman Coulter Epics XL, Beckman Coulter Cytomics FC500, BD FACS Calibur). 50 samples from healthy donors were distributed to 3 labs and tested according to individual lab's standard operating procedure to verify whether the normal reference ranges of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets established were appropriate. The application of internal quality control was also investigated. Commercial blood quality control reagents were given to the 3 FCM labs and tested within 20 working days paralleled with routine samples. In addition, 20 patients' samples were prepared using 4 different combinations of reagents ( a , b , c and d). The results from combination a, which used the Beckman Coulter reagents and instrument, were compared to the results from combination b, c and d, which used reagents from different manufacturers. Then the prepared samples were tested on Beckman Coulter Epics XL to evaluate the effects of different combinations of reagents on the results of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets analyzed by the same instrument. Furthermore, 24 patients' samples prepared by same reagents from Beckman Coulter company were tested on both Beckman Coulter Epics XL and BD FACS Calibur respectively to assess the effects of different instruments on peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets. 20 patients' samples prepared by same reagents and instruments were analyzed by Beckman Coulter Epics XL analytic system and BD FACS Calibur analytic system respectively to assess the effects of the two analytic systems on the lymphocyte subsets. Results Over 10% of the results for NK and T4/T8 in lab A as well as T4 in labs B and C fell outside of their normal reference ranges. The probabilities exceeding corresponding normal reference ranges were 16% ( 9/50 ), 24% ( 12/50 ), 22% (11/50) and 12% ( 6/50 ), respectively. The results using internal blood quality control in 3 FCM labs within 20 working days were all within the reference ranges of the quality control provided by the kit. The biases from b and c reagent combinations were substantial compared with that of reagent a combination. Among the biases from b and c reagent combinations, the lowest probability of bias exceeding 10% was T8 of combination b, which had probability of 70% (14/20). The highest probabilities of hias exceeding 10% were T3 and T4 of b and c reagent combinations, which reached 100% (20/20) . Furthermore, the biases of T3, T8 and B of d reagent combination compared with that of reagent a combination were also substantial. The probabilities of bias exceeding 10% were 35% (7/20) ,85% (17/20) and 75% (15/20), respectively. Comparing the results of samples prepared and analyzed by reagents and instruments from different manufacturers to that of samples prepared and analyzed by the same company's reagents and instruments showed that there were great discrepancies in T3, T4 , T8 , B and NK. The probabilities of bias exceeding 10% were 71% ( 17/24), 80% (19/24) ,38% (9/24), 33% (8/24) and 92% (22/24), respectively. The biases of T8, NK and B were substantial when compared the results from Beckman Coulter Epics XL analytic systems and BD FACS Calibur analytic systems. The probabilities of bias exceeding 10% were 55% (11/20 ), 70% ( 14/20 ) and 55% (11/20), respectively. Conclusions FCM labs should set up their own normal reference range for peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets. The normal reference range should be verified periodically. It is important to apply internal blood quality control regularly and accumulate the quality control results. The reagents and instrument for preparing peripheral blood samples should be from the same manufacturers.

[Standardization and Quality Control in Flow Cytometric Enumeration of CD34(+) Cells]

A Novel Three-parameter Flow Cytometric Analysis for Cell Cycle

Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis

Comparison of peripheral blood automated hematopoietic progenitor cell count and flow cytometric CD34+ cell count

Correlation of various methods of hematopoietic progenitor cell estimation with standard flowcytometric CD34 enumeration

True volumetric counting of CD34+ cells using flow cytometry

Standardization of flow cytometric detection of the antigen expression

Can Immature Granulocyte Counting be Utilized in the Selection of Samples for Flow Cytometric Enumeration of Stem Cells?

Hematopoietic progenitor cell count as a potential quantitative marker in apheresis products during allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Prediction of Viable CD34 Count in Harvested Product by Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Progenitor Count of Automated Hematology Analyzer Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Counting for Prediction of the Yield of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell in Mobilization and Harvest

A Novel Method for Enumeration of Basophiles in Peripheral Blood by Flow Cytometry

Establishing CD19 B-cell reference control materials for comparable and quantitative cytometric expression analysis

Validation of a flow cytometry-based method to quantify viable lymphocyte subtypes in fresh and cryopreserved hematopoietic cellular products

[Evaluation of Two Methods for Counting Residual White Blood Cells in Thrombocytaphoresis Concentrates].

Biological Variations of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytesusing Flow Cytometric Double-Platform Method

Approaches for Performance Verification Toward Standardization of Peripheral Blood Regulatory T-Cell Detection by Flow Cytometry

Sorting and analysis of hematopoietic stem cells and myeloid lineage-committed progenitors using flow cytometry

Quantitative estimation of G-CSFR expressed on nucleated cells in peripheral blood from healthy people

Advances and challenges in platelet counting: evolving from traditional microscopy to modern flow cytometry

Effects of Different Analytic Systems on the Immunophenotypic Analysis of Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Subsets by Flow Cytometry