Abstract:Background Lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is currently the only therapeutic approach in primary open-angle glaucoma. and the fixed-combination medications are needed to achieve sufficiently low target IOP. A multicenter prospective study in the Chinese population was needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Eye Drop in China. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination with concurrent administration of its components in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Methods In this multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel controlled study, patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were insufficiently responsive to monotherapy with either topical β-blockers or prostaglandin analogues were randomized to one of two active treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio at 11 Chinese ophthalmic departments. Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination treatment was a fixed combination of 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.5% timolol (followed by vehicle for masking) once daily at 19:00 P.M. and concurrent treatment was 0.03% bimatoprost followed by 0.5% timolol once daily at 19:00 P.M. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in mean diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) at week 4 visit in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Primary analysis evaluated the non-inferiority of bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination to concurrent with respect to the primary variable using a confidence interval (CI) approach. Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination was to be considered non-inferior to concurrent if the upper limit of the 95% CI for the between-treatment (bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination minus concurrent) difference was ≤1.5 mmHg. Adverse events were collected and slit-lamp examinations were performed to assess safety. Between-group comparisons of the incidence of adverse events were performed using the Pearson chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Results Of the enrolled 235 patients, 121 patients were randomized to receive bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination and, 114 patients were randomized to receive concurrent treatment. At baseline the mean value of mean diurnal IOP was (25.20±3.06) mmHg in the bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination group and (24.87±3.88) mmHg in the concurrent group. The difference between the treatment groups was not statistically significant. The mean change from baseline in mean diurnal IOP (±standard deviation) in the bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination group was (−9.38±4.66) mmHg and it was (−8.93±4.25) mmHg in the concurrent group (P <0.01). The difference between the two treatment groups (bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination minus concurrent) in the change from baseline of mean diurnal IOP was -0.556 mmHg (95% CI: −1.68, 0.57, P=0.330). The upper limit of the 95% CI was less than 1.5 mmHg, the predefined margin of non-inferiority. Adverse events occurred in 26.4% (32/121) of the bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination patients and 30.7% (35/114) of the concurrent patients. The most frequent adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia, which was reported as treatment related in 16.5% (20/121) in the bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination group and 18.4% (21/114) in the concurrent group (P >0.05). Conclusions Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination administered in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension was not inferior to concurrent dosing with the individual components. Safety profiles were similar between the treatment groups.

[The Ocular Hypotensive Effect and Safety of 0.2% Brimonidine].

Comparison of Latanoprost and Brimonidine in the Treatment of Open Angle Glaucoma

A clinical multicenter comparative study of domestic and imported brimonidine in 139 patients

Brimonidine tartrate for the treatment of glaucoma

Comparison of the Efficacy and Tolerance of Moxonidine with Enalapril in Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension

Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Efficacy and Safety of Bimatoprost 0.03% Therapy for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Patients in China.

Clinical studies of D-timolol vs L-timolol

Comparison of allergy prevalence using brinzolamide 1.0% / brimonidine 0.2% fixed combination with and without β-blocker in glaucoma patients: a retrospective cohort study

Brinzolamide plus brimonidine for the treatment of glaucoma: an update

Safety and Efficacy of Bimatoprost/timolol Fixed Combination in Chinese Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.

A multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of loteprednol etabonate 0.5%/tobramycin 0.3% with dexamethasone 0.1%/tobramycin 0.3% in the treatment of Chinese patients with blepharokeratoconjunctivitis.

Sustained release of brimonidine from conjunctival sac insert to reduce intraocular pressure for glaucoma treatment

Timolol,brinzolamide and Travoprost in Treatment of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension

Effect of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% ophthalmic solution on visual quality after implantable collamer lens implantation with a central hole

Brimonidine as a possible treatment for myopia

Effect of brimonidine on visual indices in patients with acute optic neuritis: A single blind randomized clinical trial

Clinic Application of Timolol Ophthalmic Gel

Efficacy of brinzolamide in the initial management of acute primary angle closure: A randomized controlled trial

[Randomized Parallel Group Study of 0.0015% Tafluprost Ophthalmic Solution in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension (comparison with 0.005% Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution)].

Inhibition by brimonidine of forskolin-induced nitric oxide synthase expression in human ciliary bodies in vitro.

Is it essential to change the term "essential hypertension"?