Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Efficacy and Safety of Bimatoprost 0.03% Therapy for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Patients in China.

Kaidi Wang,Li Xu,Zhilan Yuan,Ke Yao,Junmei Zhao,Liang Xu,Aiwu Fang,Mingzhi Zhang,Lingling Wu,Jian Ji,Jiamin Hou,Qing Liu,Xinghuai Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-21
IF: 2.086
2014-01-01
BMC Ophthalmology
Abstract:BACKGROUND:To report the clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension treated with bimatoprost 0.03% therapy.METHODS:Two hundred sixty-three Chinese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension who needed initial or additional intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering were recruited in this prospective, open-label, multicenter clinical study and were treated with bimatoprost 0.03%. Patients received bimatoprost 0.03% as initial, replacement or adjunctive IOP-lowering therapy, and follow-up visits were performed at week 1, and month 1 and 3 of the bimatoprost treatment. The efficacy outcome measure was the post-treatment IOP level. The safety outcome measures included the rate of medication-related symptoms, physical signs, reported adverse events, and the level of conjunctival hyperemia.RESULTS:Among 240 patients who could be categorized by pre-existing therapies and the bimatoprost therapy regimen in the study, IOP values observed in all medication conditions showed significant IOP reduction at all study visits compared with baseline. At 3 months, 8.0 ± 3.7 mmHg (32.0%) reduction in IOP was observed in treatment-naive patients after bimatoprost monotherapy; in the patients previously on various therapy regimens, 1.9 ± 2.8 mmHg (9.5%) to 6.4 ± 6.1 mmHg (24.8%) additional IOP lowering was achieved after switching to bimatoprost monotherapy or bimatoprost combination therapy. The most common adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia, mainly of trace and mild intensity.CONCLUSIONS:Our results show that bimatoprost 0.03% was effective in lowering IOP with favorable safety in Chinese primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?