Abstract:Summary Objectives This study evaluated the validity of two videolaryngostroboscopic (VLS) rating tools to detect differences in VLS ratings between normophonic speakers, mild, and moderate-severely dysphonic speakers. Methods Sixteen rigid VLS exams were obtained from four normophonic controls and 12 speakers with dysphonia (8 = mild, 4 = moderate-severe) secondary to laryngeal pathology. Eight clinicians rated nine vibratory VLS parameters for each exam using both the Voice-vibratory Assessment of Laryngeal Imaging (VALI) tool and a 100 mm visual analog scales (VAS). Ratings obtained for both right and left vocal folds (eg, mucosal wave, amplitude of vibration, nonvibrating portion) were averaged. One rating of overall severity of laryngeal function using a 100 mm VAS also was obtained. ANOVAs were used to evaluate differences in VLS parameters between three speaker groups (normophonic, mildly dysphonic, moderate-severely dysphonic) using these two rating tools. Results There were statistically significant differences between controls and moderate-severely dysphonic speakers and for all VLS parameters except phase symmetry ( P < 0.05) for both VALI and VAS ratings. Differences between mildly dysphonic and moderate-severely dysphonic and speakers were observed for 4/6 VALI ratings (mucosal wave, nonvibratory portions, phase closure, and regularity) and 5/6 parameters (mucosal wave, amplitude of vibration, nonvibratory portions, phase closure, and regularity) for VAS ratings. Significant differences between controls and mildly dysphonic speakers were not observed for VLS parameter rated using the VALI. There were significant differences between controls and mildly dysphonic speakers for 3/6 parameters (mucosal wave, amplitude of vibration, nonvibratory portion) using a VAS. Ratings of overall severity of laryngeal function differed between all levels of dysphonia severity. Conclusions Significant differences in VLS ratings were observed for comparisons of normophonic and moderate-severely dysphonic speakers and mild to moderately dysphonic speakers using the VALI and the VAS. However, the VAS scale appeared to better differentiate differences in VLS measures between normophonic speakers and those with mild dysphonia. Future studies should consider rating scale sensitivity when VLS rating tools are selected for clinical and research purposes.

Assessment of velopharyngeal status of postoperative cleft palate patients in silent mode by visual analog scale

[Influence of Glottal Stops on Nasalance and Velopharyngeal Closure Status after Cleft Palate Surgery].

Study on the Sonogram and Acoustic Characteristics of Consonant-vowel Syllable in Patients with Post-palatoplasty Velopharyngeal Incompetence

Comparative study of three methods on assessing velopharyngeal function

Acoustic characteristics of consonants in patients with post-palatoplasty velopharyngeal incompetence

[A clinical application and study of analysis system of sound spectrography]

An Observational Study to Evaluate Association Between Velopharyngeal Anatomy and Speech Outcomes in Adult Patients With Severe Velopharyngeal Insufficiency

Study on the Phonetic Features of Pharyngoplasty

Surgical Correction of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Cleft Palate Patients with Two Procedures of Reconstruction of Radical Intravelar Veloplasties (Ivvs)

Perceptual Evaluation and Acoustic Analysis of Pneumatic Artificial Larynx

Sensitivity of Videolaryngostroboscopic Rating Tools to Differences in Dysphonia Severity

Validity, reliability and reproducibility of the VLS parameters form for the collection of videolaryngostroboscopic basic findings

Evaluation of nasolabial lateral profile harmony in cleft lip and palate patients

Clinical study on velopharyngeal function after maxillary advancement

Analysis of velopharyngeal morphology in operated cleft palate patients with levator veli palatini retropositioning according to Sommerlad]

[Effects of Simultaneous Nasometer and Nasopharyngeal Fibroscopic Examination on the Value of Nasalization Rate in Cleft Palate Patients].

Effects of Suspension Pharyngeal Flap on Speech in Filipino Individuals with Velopharyngeal Insufficiency

Comparison Study of Vocal Attack Time in Patients With Cleft Palate With and Without Glottal Stop in Mandarin.

Logistic Regression Analysis on Factors Associated with Velopharyngeal Competence after Primary Repair of Cleft Palate

Identification and analysis of Nonlinear behaviors of vocal fold biomechanics during phonation to assess efficacy of surgery for benign laryngeal Diseases

Measurement and Evaluation of the Vomer Development of the Patients with Cleft Palate