Abstract:Speech disorders related to cleft lip and palate exhibit different degrees of involvement and can occur even after primary palate repair. Hypernasality can be present as a result of velopharyngeal insufficiency, as well as nasal emission, weak pressure, articulatory errors and facial grimace, affecting speech intelligibility. Palatoplasty outcomes can be variable, and among the influencing factors are the surgical technique, the surgeon's experience, the postoperative care, and the patient/cleft characteristics. The aim of this study was to correlate speech results after primary palate repair with surgical technique and cleft characteristics, using anthropometric measurements and speech assessment in patients diagnosed with cleft lip and palate. A longitudinal, retrospective study with patients who underwent primary palatoplasty between 2015 and 2019 and still attend Craniomaxillofacial Surgery Outpatient Clinic was conducted. Patients were operated on by a single surgeon using the intravelar technique veloplasty with maximal retropositioning of the soft palate elevator muscle. Patients who underwent primary palatoplasty after 2018 had the measurements before and immediately after palatoplasty recorded: length of palate, and the distances from cleft and uvula to posterior pharyngeal wall, and uvula to adenoid. Considering the total of 39 patients, 30 (76.9%) were male, with a mean age of 20.9 months (9–53 mo). All patients had their speech recorded between ages of 60 and 120 months. Speech samples were assessed by 3 different speech pathologists experienced in cleft speech, with an intrarater and inter-rater reliability >80%. The most frequent cleft type was unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (59%). One patient had mild hyponasality, 1 isolated obligatory disorder (nasal turbulence), and 3 patients presented compensatory articulation (2 isolated and 1 also presented obligatory disorder). Only 1 patient had marginal velopharyngeal insufficiency. Postoperatively, there was a mean increase in palate length from 5.4 to 5.6 cm, and a statistically significant decrease in the distance from the uvula to the pharynx wall, with a mean of 1.7 to 1.1 cm ( P <0.001). In general, patients analyzed did not have significant alterations in speech assessment, which did not allow further comparisons and correlation. Therefore, regardless of the anatomic characteristics of the palate, it is possible to achieve good results depending on the handling experience and the technique used.

An Observational Study to Evaluate Association Between Velopharyngeal Anatomy and Speech Outcomes in Adult Patients With Severe Velopharyngeal Insufficiency

Speech Outcomes Comparison Between Adult Velopharyngeal Insufficiency and Patients with Unrepaired Cleft Palate.

Preoperative Velopharyngeal Morphology in Older Cleft Palate Patients with Postoperative Velopharyngeal Closure Versus Velopharyngeal Insufficiency.

Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Speech in Adult Patients with Repaired Cleft Palate.

Analysis of Velopharyngeal Morphology in Adults with Velopharyngeal Incompetence after Surgery of a Cleft Palate

Preoperative pharyngeal depth is associated with postoperative velopharyngeal function following primary cleft palate repair at the age of five and above

[Effects of Speech Training on Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients with Cleft Palate].

Velopharyngeal function assessment in patients with cleft palate: perceptual speech assessment versus nasopharyngoscopy.

Cepstral Analysis of Voice in Children with Velopharyngeal Insufficiency after Cleft Palate Surgery

Velopharyngeal Configuration Changes Following Le Fort I Osteotomy with Maxillary Advancement in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Cephalometric Study

Speech Outcomes After Primary Palatoplasty and Presurgical Cleft Characteristics: Is There a Predictive Association?

A Preliminary Study on the Characteristics of the Velopharyngeal Structures in Different-Age Patients with Cleft Palate.

The Evaluation of the Chinese Intelligibility of Patients with Velopharyngeal Incompetence

Study of Relationship Between Clinical Factors and Velopharyngeal Closure in Cleft Palate Patients

Development of Postoperative Velopharyngeal Function in Patients with Cleft Palate.

The acoustic features of the consonant of the patients with post-palatoplasty velopharyngeal incompetence

Comparison of Velopharyngeal Morphology of Two Palatoplasty Techniques in Patients with Hard and Soft Cleft Palate

Study on the Phonetic Features of Pharyngoplasty

Proposed Clinical Model for Predicting Speech Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Furlow Palatoplasty for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency after Primary Palatoplasty.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Velopharyngeal Structures in Chinese Children after Primary Palatal Repair

Analysis of velopharyngeal morphology in operated cleft palate patients with levator veli palatini retropositioning according to Sommerlad]