Usefulness of Combined Intravascular Ultrasound Parameters to Predict Functional Significance of Coronary Artery Stenosis and Determinants of Mismatch
Yun-Kyeong Cho,Chang-Wook Nam,Jung-Kyu Han,Bon-Kwon Koo,Joon-Hyung Doh,Itsik Ben-Dor,Ron Waksman,Augusto Pichard,Naotaka Murata,Nobuhiro Tanaka,Chi-Hang Lee,Nieves Gonzalo,Javier Escaned,Marco A. Costa,Takashi Kubo,Takashi Akasake,Xinyang Hu,Jian-An Wang,Hyoung-Mo Yang,Myung-Ho Yoon,Seung-Jea Tahk,Hyuck-Jun Yoon,In-Sung Chung,Seung-Ho Hur,Kwon-Bae Kim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv11i2a30
2015-01-01
EuroIntervention
Abstract:Aims: Efficacy of combined intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) parameters in functional significance prediction and discrepancy between IVUS and fractional flow reserve (FFR) have not been well defined. This study therefore aimed to: 1) evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of combined IVUS parameters, namely minimal lumen area (MLA) and percent plaque burden (%PB), in functional significance prediction of coronary artery stenosis; and 2) define factors that affect the relation between FFR value and IVUS parameters.Methods and results: At 11 international centres, IVUS and FFR measurements were concurrently performed in 945 major epicardial coronary artery lesions (886 patients). Functional significance was defined as FFR <= 0.8. MLA and FFR correlated weakly (r=0.289, p<0.001). Diagnostic accuracy of MLA <= 4.0 mm(2), %PB >70% and their combination were 50%, 47% and 51%, respectively, with similar area under the curve (AUC) of 0.561, 0.511 and 0.516, respectively. The best cut-off values (BCV) were MLA <= 3.0 mm(2) and %PB >75%, with accuracy of 60% for MLA, 50% for %PB and 56% for their combination, and AUC of 0.618, 0.511 and 0.533, respectively. MLA BCV <= 3.0 mm(2) had higher predictive power than %PB BCV >75% or their combination. Independent predictors of functional significance were male gender (odds ratio 1.76 [95% confidence interval: 1.19-2.62]), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 0.98 [0.96-0.99]), LAD lesion (2.52 [1.73-3.67]), reference vessel diameter (0.60 [0.41-0.86]), lesion length (1.04 [1.02-1.06]) and MLA (0.79 [0.69-0.92]). False negative lesion incidence was 24.4% in association with race (for Asians, 0.391 [0.219-0.698]), LAD lesion (2.677 [1.709-4.191]) and LVEF (0.977 [0.957-0.997]). False positive lesion incidence was 17.0% in association with non-LAD lesion (2.444 [1.620-3.686]).Conclusions: Combined IVUS parameters did not improve the accuracy of functional significance prediction. Discrepancy between IVUS and FFR, which was not rare, should be taken into account in clinical decision making.