Target Lesion Revascularization After Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Ko Yamamoto,Hiroki Shiomi,Takeshi Morimoto,Akiyoshi Miyazawa,Hiroki Watanabe,Masahiro Natsuaki,Hirotoshi Watanabe,Kyohei Yamaji,Masanobu Ohya,Sunao Nakamura,Satoru Mitomo,Satoru Suwa,Takenori Domei,Shojiro Tatsushima,Koh Ono,Hiroki Sakamoto,Kiyotaka Shimamura,Masataka Shigetoshi,Ryoji Taniguchi,Yuji Nishimoto,Hideki Okayama,Kensho Matsuda,Takafumi Yokomatsu,Masahiro Muto,Ren Kawaguchi,Koichi Kishi,Mitsuyoshi Hadase,Tsutomu Fujita,Yasunori Nishida,Masami Nishino,Hiromasa Otake,Nobuhiro Suematsu,Tsuneki Ajimi,Kengo Tanabe,Mitsuru Abe,Kiyoshi Hibi,Kazushige Kadota,Kenji Ando,Takeshi Kimura,OPTIVUS-Complex PCI Investigators*
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.012922
Abstract:Background: Several stent expansion criteria derived from the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) evaluation have been proposed to predict future clinical outcomes, but optimal stent expansion criteria as a guide during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are still controversial. There are no studies evaluating the utility of stent expansion criteria along with the clinical and procedural factors in predicting target lesion revascularization (TLR) after contemporary IVUS-guided PCI. Methods: OPTIVUS-Complex PCI study (Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) multivessel cohort was a prospective multicenter study enrolling 961 patients undergoing multivessel PCI including left anterior descending coronary artery using IVUS with an intention to meet the prespecified criteria for optimal stent expansion. We compared several stent expansion criteria (minimum stent area [MSA], MSA/distal or average reference lumen area, MSA/distal or average reference vessel area, OPTIVUS criteria, IVUS-XPL [Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions] criteria, ULTIMATE [Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Drug Eluting Stents Implantation in "All-Comers" Coronary Lesions] criteria, and modified MUSIC [Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study] criteria) as well as clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics between lesions with and without TLR. Results: Among 1957 lesions, the cumulative 1-year incidence of lesion-based TLR was 1.6% (30 lesions). Hemodialysis, treatment of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions, calcified lesions, small proximal reference lumen area, and small MSA had univariate associations with TLR, while all of the stent expansion criteria except for MSA were not associated with TLR. The independent risk factors of TLR were calcified lesions (hazard ratio, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.03-5.32]; P=0.04) and small proximal reference lumen area (Tertile 1: hazard ratio, 7.01 [95% CI, 1.45-33.93]; P=0.02; and Tertile 2: hazard ratio, 5.40 [95% CI, 1.17-24.90]; P=0.03). Conclusions: In contemporary IVUS-guided PCI practice, the 1-year incidence of TLR was very low. MSA, but not other stent expansion criteria, had univariate association with TLR. Independent risk factors of TLR were calcified lesions and small proximal reference lumen area, although the findings should be interpreted with caution due to small number of TLR events, limited lesion complexity, and short duration of follow-up.