Automated Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Thioacetamide, Carbon Tetrachloride, and Bile Duct Ligation Rodent Models Using Second-Harmonic Generation/two-Photon Excited Fluorescence Microscopy
Feng Liu,Long Chen,Hui-Ying Rao,Xiao Teng,Ya-Yun Ren,Yan-Qiang Lu,Wei Zhang,Nan Wu,Fang-Fang Liu,Lai Wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.2016.128
IF: 5.511
2017-01-01
Laboratory Investigation
Abstract:Animal models provide a useful platform for developing and testing new drugs to treat liver fibrosis. Accordingly, we developed a novel automated system to evaluate liver fibrosis in rodent models. This system uses second-harmonic generation (SHG)/two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) microscopy to assess a total of four mouse and rat models, using chemical treatment with either thioacetamide (TAA) or carbon tetrachloride (CCl 4 ), and a surgical method, bile duct ligation (BDL). The results obtained by the new technique were compared with that using Ishak fibrosis scores and two currently used quantitative methods for determining liver fibrosis: the collagen proportionate area (CPA) and measurement of hydroxyproline (HYP) content. We show that 11 shared morphological parameters faithfully recapitulate Ishak fibrosis scores in the models, with high area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) performance. The AUC values of 11 shared parameters were greater than that of the CPA (TAA: 0.758–0.922 vs 0.752–0.908; BDL: 0.874–0.989 vs 0.678–0.966) in the TAA mice and BDL rat models and similar to that of the CPA in the TAA rat and CCl 4 mouse models. Similarly, based on the trends in these parameters at different time points, 9, 10, 7, and 2 model-specific parameters were selected for the TAA rats, TAA mice, CCl 4 mice, and BDL rats, respectively. These parameters identified differences among the time points in the four models, with high AUC accuracy, and the corresponding AUC values of these parameters were greater compared with those of the CPA in the TAA rat and mouse models (rats: 0.769–0.894 vs 0.64–0.799; mice: 0.87–0.93 vs 0.739–0.836) and similar to those of the CPA in the CCl 4 mouse and BDL rat models. Similarly, the AUC values of 11 shared parameters and model-specific parameters were greater than those of HYP in the TAA rats, TAA mice, and CCl 4 mouse models and were similar to those of HYP in the BDL rat models. The automated evaluation system, combined with 11 shared parameters and model-specific parameters, could specifically, accurately, and quantitatively stage liver fibrosis in animal models.