Dynamics of Self-regulation: How (un)accomplished Goal Actions Affect Motivation Effects of To-date and To-go Information Self-regulation toward Personal Goals versus Social Goals Overview of Research Study 1: Academic Goals Results and Discussion
Ayelet Fishbach,Minjung Koo
Abstract:Two factors increase the motivation to adhere to a goal: goal commitment and lack of goal progress. When people ask about commitment, focusing on what they have accomplished (to date) signals to them high commitment and increases motivation. Conversely, when commitment is certain and people ask about goal progress, focusing on what they have yet to accomplish (to go) signals to them lack of progress and increases motivation. Accordingly, 4 studies show that emphasizing to-date information increases goal adherence when commitment is uncertain—that is, when participants study for a relatively unimportant exam, consume luxuries, fulfill a desire, and make first-time contributions to a charity. Conversely , emphasizing to-go information increases goal adherence when commitment is certain—that is, when participants study for an important exam, consume necessities, fulfill a need, and make repeated contributions to a charity. People often encourage themselves to work on a goal by considering either what they have accomplished (a to-date frame) or what remains for them to do to attain the goal (a to-go frame). For example, students increase their motivation to study by assessing the amount of time and effort they have already invested in an academic task or by assessing the amount of time and effort required to complete the academic task. Similarly, athletes maintain their motivation to complete a long race by considering either the completed distance or the remaining distance to the finish line. In addition, social agents, organizations, and educators provide information about what has been accomplished to date versus what has yet to be accomplished, to motivate others to act on shared social goals. For example, fundraisers present information about either the amount of donations that they have received thus far (i.e., seed money) or the amount that is missing, to complete a charity campaign goal. Whereas emphasizing actions in to-date and to-go frames is common, in this article we examine how such variations in the emphasis affect motivation. For example, when does information about the amount of money donated thus far versus the amount required to complete a campaign goal increase the likelihood of making a pledge? In particular, we build on research on dynamics of self-regulation, which distinguishes between self-regulation that is based on estimates of goal commitment and highlighting and self-regulation that is based on estimates of lack of progress and balancing (Fishbach & Dhar, 2005; Fishbach, Dhar, & Zhang, 2006). We propose that when people evaluate …
Psychology