Enhancing pedicle screw fixation in the aging spine with a novel bioactive bone cement: an in vitro biomechanical study.

Qingan Zhu,Stephen Kingwell,Zhaoyang Li,Haobo Pan,William W Lu,Thomas R Oxland
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825a676e
IF: 3.241
2012-01-01
Spine
Abstract:Study Design. A paired biomechanical study of pedicle screws augmented with bone cement in a human cadaveric and osteoporotic lumbar spine model. Objectives. To evaluate immediate strength and stiffness of pedicle screw fixation augmented with a novel bioactive bone cement in an osteoporotic spine model and compare it with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement. Summary of Background Data. A novel bioactive bone cement, containing nanoscale particles of strontium and hydroxyapatite (Sr-HA), can promote new bone formation and osteointegration and provides a promising reinforcement to the osteoporotic spine. Its immediate mechanical performance in augmenting pedicle screw fixation has not been evaluated. Methods. Two pedicle screws augmented with Sr-HA and PMMA cement were applied to each of 10 isolated cadaveric L3 vertebrae. Each screw was subjected to a toggling test and screw kinematics were calculated. The pedicle screw was subjected to a pullout test until failure. Finally, the screw coverage with cement was measured on computed tomographic images. Results. Screw translations in the toggling test were consistently larger in the Sr-HA group than in the PMMA group (1.4 +/- 1.2 mm vs. 1.0 +/- 1.1 mm at 1000 cycles). The rotation center was located closer to the screw tip in the Sr-HA group (19% of screw length) than in the PMMA group (37%). The only kinematic difference between Sr-HA and PMMA cements was the screw rotation at 1000 cycles (1.5 degrees +/- 0.9 degrees vs. 1.3 degrees +/- 0.6 degrees; P = 0.0026). All motion parameters increased significantly with more loading cycles. The pullout force was higher in the PMMA group than the Sr-HA group (1.40 +/- 0.63 kN vs. 0.93 +/- 0.70 kN), and this difference was marginally significant (P = 0.051). Sr-HA cement covered more of the screw length than PMMA cement (79 +/- 19% vs. 43 +/- 19%) (P = 0.036). Conclusion. This paired-design study identified some subtle but mostly nonsignificant differences in immediate biomechanical fixation of pedicle screws augmented with the Sr-HA cement compared with the PMMA cement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?