Comparing Models of Mental Health Service Systems Between Australia and China: Implications for the Future Development of Chinese Mental Health Service.
Liu Tie-Qiao,Ng Chee,Ma Hong,David Castle,Hao Wei,Li Ling-Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00029330-200807020-00017
2008-01-01
Abstract:Mental illness is recognized as a significant social and public health problem in China, with approximately 16 million people affected with mental illness according to a report in 2002.1 In addition, approximately 30 million children and young adolescents are suffering from mood and/or behavioral disorders. Drug and alcohol problems and other psychosocial disorders affecting women, elders and survivors of disasters are also important problems adding to the overall national mental health burden. Research from both China and abroad indicate that mental and behavioral problems will continue to increase in the future. The World Health Organization (WHO) has warned that the financial burden from mental disorders in China will constitute 1/4 of total burden from various diseases in 2020.1 The Chinese central government has already acknowledged the growing mental health problems and prioritized mental health among other public health issues. This policy is significant in developing the Chinese mental health system and promoting the reform of its current service model. As advocated by many experts in this field, a key approach for Chinese mental health service reform is to integrate international experiences into the Chinese cultural context. Due to the uniqueness of Chinese history and traditional culture, specific strategies will inevitably need to be developed within the Chinese mental health service. This paper compares and contrasts mainstream mental health service models between Australia and China aiming at examining the implications for developing Chinese mental health service reform. CHINESE SERVICE MODEL FOR PEOPLE WITH MENTAL ILLNESS Predominantly, treatment approaches for people with mental illness in China have used a hospital-based service model. Except for a few economically developed cities and regions which have implemented elements of community services, most other areas have relied on psychiatric hospitals and outpatient services. Institutionalization and pharmacological treatment are mainly provided, particularly for patients with severe mental illness, while other interventions and services are limited to the hospital settings. Most mental health professionals are not sufficiently trained to implement community and rehabilitation services as well as secondary consultation and mental health promotion. The characteristic pathway to care for Chinese people with mental illness starts with seeking medical help, often under the escort of families, from a general hospital or a hospital with psychiatric specialty (psychiatric hospital) (Figure 1). Here they receive assessment and treatment by outpatient clinicians. Severely psychotic patients (including those who are cognitively impaired, violent to themselves or others and/or treatment noncompliant) will be admitted to inpatient service. The duration of hospital stay may vary from 20 days to 3 months. After discharge, follow up is provided by the outpatient service with the majority of these patients being cared for at home. In China, around 90% of psychotic patients live together with families2 who have to provide all aspects of care. Due to limited resources in the community, many patients do not have access to proper treatment and rehabilitation services, especially in the rural and mountainous areas. Compounding the lack of community services, for financial reasons some hospitals may even promote institutionalization by prolonging hospital stay beyond the clinical need.Figure 1.: Flow chart of Chinese service model for people with mental illness.AUSTRALIAN MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE MODEL Although Australia initiated its mental health service changes from the early 1960s to mid-1980s with a process of deinstitutionalization, most of this occurred in an unplanned fashion. The first National Mental Health Strategy was agreed upon after an agreement by all State governments in 1992. It directed the restructuring of the public mental health service to: (1) ensure adequate service response to patients with mental illness; (2) integrate with other general health services; (3) reduce reliance on psychiatric hospital and integrate into community-based service; (4) emphasize priority to those with severe mental illness and (5) increase participation of patients, families and carers in treatment planning. This is supported by the mental health legislation that establishes principles for involuntary treatment orders in the community and confirms that mentally ill patients have rights to choose living in a community and their treatment should be provided in the least restricted setting and in the least intrusive manner. Under the guidance of this Strategy and coordination of government at various levels, nearly all large psychiatric hospitals have been closed and resources have been shifted to the community. A largely hospital-based mental health service system has been replaced by one that is community-based even for the seriously and chronically mentally ill. Inpatient treatment for the acute mentally ill is mostly provided by general hospitals with gazetted psychiatric beds which are typically small in number (e.g. 25-40 beds per hospital). The average length of hospital stay is normally short (average 12-15 days). A range of programs are implemented by community teams to promote continuity of care, and community mental health service has become the mainstream model for treatment of patients with serious mental illness. The State of Victoria has led the way in implementing the national mental health strategy in successful coordination and collaboration among multiple public health service departments, non-government and community agencies. After more than ten years of reform, the Victorian community mental health service underpinned by the “person-centered” model has become one of the most advanced in the world. General practitioners (GPs) are usually the first point of contact for patients with mental health problems, where initial assessment and treatment are provided. If necessary referral is subsequently made to specialized mental health services either, private or public. Private services are provided by private psychiatric hospitals and private psychiatrists and psychologists. The public mental health system consists of clinical services and psychiatric disability rehabilitation and support services (PDRSS) which are provided by non-government agencies. The public clinical services are funded and provided by the state government, and are primarily delivered on an area basis by different services within the state (e.g. in Victoria there are 13 metropolitan areas and eight rural areas). Each area mental health service provides three types or streams of mental health service: Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (0-18 years); Adult Mental Health Services (16-64 years); and Aged Persons Mental Health Services (≥65 years). Each stream has both hospital inpatient service and fully comprehensive community mental health services. Clinical mental health services provide assessment, diagnosis, treatment and clinical case management to people with a serious mental illness. All area mental health services provide a full range of functions and have several different components. Acute emergency service Psychiatric triage nurses in the Emergency Department of General Hospitals or duty intake workers at the Community Mental Health Clinics assess all referrals of acute psychiatric problems. Depending on risk, subacute and less complicated cases are referred to community mental health service or private services directly. Complex and urgent cases are reviewed by a Crisis Assessment and Treatment Team (CATT) which provide urgent community-based assessment and short-term treatment interventions to those in psychiatric crisis. All referrals are screened in order to make a decision whether hospitalization is required or not. Acute inpatient service Located within acute general hospitals, the acute inpatient service provides short-term treatment for patients with acute psychiatric symptoms. They are regularly assessed to see if they have recovered sufficiently to receive treatment in the community. Upon discharge, patients will return home with continuous treatment and support from a CATT or other community treatment services. Community mental health services Most patients with mental illness will return home to their community where a range of community services can be accessed. A case manager is allocated to every patient treated by the public mental health service. This individual is responsible for case monitoring, clinical review and coordination of appropriate services. The case manager also develops and implements the Individual Service Plan (ISP) for every patient in collaboration with the patient and the community treatment team. The patient-centered care is provided by the Continuing Care service over a variable time period and frequently in liaison with GPs, local community agencies and public welfare service to ensure ongoing support and continuity of care for patients in the community. The Mobile Support and Treatment Team (MSTT) provides long-term assertive outreach, rehabilitation and support to high disability patients, especially those with complex psychosocial demands, recurrent problems, aggression and/or medical non-compliance. The Homeless Outreach Psychiatric Service (HOPS) mainly targets patients who are homeless and difficult to engage by providing psychosocial intervention and treatment aimed at addressing complex needs (legal, drug/alcohol dependence and housing issues). Community Care Units (CCU) are community-based facilities that provide medium to long-term accommodations, clinical care and rehabilitation. Professional care is available to patients who are dependent and/or chronically disabled to teach daily living skills so that they can be transfered to other community residential facilities. Secure Extended Care Units (SECU) provide medium to long-term inpatient treatment and rehabilitation for patients who are severely psychotic and/or at risk of harming themselves or others. These patients are detained under the Mental Health Act and the units are locked. Other services Psychiatric Disability and Rehabilitation Support Services (PDRSS) are a group of non-government organizations providing non-clinical support focusing on addressing the impact of mental illness and the psychosocial disadvantage resulting from mental illness by maximizing patient's opportunities to return to the community. Other specialist services which require a higher level of expertise for those with specific clinical needs are delivered on a statewide basis. These include forensic, eating disorders, neuropsychiatry, mother-baby, drug and alcohol services. In summary, a comprehensive range of services is provided by GPs, case managers, community mental health services and various organizations (both government and non-government) that work in an integrated and cooperative manner to help patients recover and maintain maximum independence in the community. The referral flow chart is shown in Figure 2.Figure 2.: Flow chart of Victoria mental health service mix.THE GAP IN MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE BETWEEN CHINA AND AUSTRALIA Inadequate financial input and limited basic resources The total health expenditures make up only 5% of China's GDP (Gross Domestic Product), compared to 13% in the United States, 7% in Japan and Thailand3 and 9.3% in Australia. Indeed, China uses only 1% of the world's total health expenditures to care for 21% of the world's population. In a recent report, there are only 965 mental health institutions, 16 000-19 000 psychiatrists and 27 000-31 000 psychiatric nurses and 160 000-180 000 psychiatric inpatient's beds (1.2-1.4 beds/10 000 individuals) in China to provide for more than 1.3 billion people. The services delivered by clinical psychologists, social workers and occupational therapists are mostly unavailable.4 To compare this data with the global mental health resources reported by WHO in 2001 in the Mental Health Atlas Project outlining the current status in all countries, the basic resources for mental health care in China are obviously inadequate.5 Uneven distribution of limited resources The majority of mental health service facilities in China are located in the urban areas and 80% of the total health budget in China is allocated to hospital-based treatment in the urban areas, despite the fact that urban residents account for only 30% of the population.3,6 As few mental health services are available in most rural areas, this results in unequal access to mental health services between the urban and rural residents. While rich rural patients may travel a long way to seek medical help and access expensive inpatient services in large city hospitals, the majority of the poor rural patients can only receive non-professional mental health service in rural hospitals.7 In addition, many highly qualified medical personnel migrate to the city from rural areas, attracted by better salaries and more advanced medical technology; this further depletes the medical health service in the countryside.8 The lack of trained mental health professionals remains a key obstacle to the provision of adequate mental health service in the rural areas. The situation is further aggravated by the lack of medical insurance coverage for residents in such areas.6 Imbalance owing to socioeconomic development Owing to the significant differences in economic development among various regions in a diverse country such as China, the resources and infrastructure of the mental health services varies greatly between regions. Generally speaking, the overall resources of mental health service in metropolitan cities, such as Beijing and Shanghai, are more substantial than those in the middle or western regions. Medical policies Australia has a welfare oriented medical service model. Each citizen has the right to access basic medical health care service, and patients only need to pay minimal out of pocket medical cost. In China, after the era of the cooperative medical treatment policy, many rural patients cannot afford even basic medical costs. On the other hand, with the introduction of the “contract responsibility system” in the early 1980s this has created strong incentives for hospital-based physicians to provide over-servicing (e.g. unnecessary procedures, prolonged hospitalization, and expensive medications). As the income the hospital earns increases, the higher bonuses the hospital staffs will be paid. This trend not only results in an increase of patients' medical expenses but also undermines the roles of doctors in primary health care, prevention and rehabilitation services.9,10 The early application of mental health rehabilitation models in both urban (Shanghai) and rural (Yantai) areas failed to be replicated in other cities during the 1980s. A key reason for this is the lack of financial sustainability, because, while the model benefits patients through community rehabilitation, the hospital and staff do not derive much profit. This creates a financial disincentive for providing successful community rehabilitation. The profit-based medical service system had a similar impact on the poor sections of the population. Although services are available, people can neither afford nor access them. About a third of 7.8 million schizophrenia patients have never received proper diagnosis and treatment.6 Another study shows that, among the lowest income social groups, 70% of patients with mental illness do not receive treatment because of their disadvantaged financial situation.11 The structure and quality of mental health service In Australia, the mental health service model is largely community-based. Hospitals function primarily as a place for assessment and commencement of treatment for patients. Both inpatient and outpatient services are staffed by fully trained and professionally accredited mental health workers in fields of psychiatry and related disciplines. Patients have easy access to advanced treatments including novel pharmacotherapy, psychological therapies and evidenced-based treatment approaches. The majority of patients also live independently in the community instead of living together with their family members. A full range of services ranging from acute treatment to long term rehabilitation is provided by multidisciplinary professionals in the community. In China, except for a few cities and districts that can provide some elements of community service, the mainstream model of care for patients with mental illness is hospital-based provided by psychiatric hospitals. Patients are hospitalized or prescribed some medication for home treatment. These hospitals are normally run in a custodial management style. The average length of hospital stay is about 2 months during which patients receive medications, basic mental health education and rehabilitation. Overall, however, treatment methods are relatively scarce other than medication treatment because of the high patient to staff ratio and the lack of professionally trained psychologists, social workers and occupational therapist. In China, more than 90% of people with mental illness live with their family members or relatives who carry most of the burden of care due to the lack of community service. However, due to the lack of mental health literacy and skills to provide care in acute or difficult situations, carer givers have little choice other than to resort to large hospitals for help. Nearby hospitals are within relatively easy reach for urban residents, but accessibility for those from rural or remote areas for psychiatric care is very poor. It is not uncommon for rural patients to travel for several days to see a doctor in the city. The cost of getting adequate treatment including transport, accommodation, medical consultation and medicines is prohibitive and mostly unaffordable for rural patients. This is one of the critical reasons for the lack of treatment for rural patients. Although the quality of Chinese mental health services is steadily improving, there are still many gaps in terms of workforce and technical expertise. The over-reliance on the medical approach to mental health care has yielded a narrow emphasis on symptom relief rather than recovery and improvement of quality of life and social function. The lack of psychological and sociological perspectives in caring for the mentally ill has severely restricted the use of the bio-psychosocial model of care that is grounded in scientific principles and research.12 The governance of mental health service facilities The mental health service facilities in Australia are governed by the state government health departments. Therefore, they have almost sole responsibility for the delivery of public mental health service and become accountable for any problems that may arise. However, in China, mental health care facilities are managed by different departments including the Ministries of Public Health, Civil Affairs, Defense, Industry and Mining, Public Security and the People's Liberation Army. This governance style is overly complex and has multi-levels so that it is difficult to coordinate the services, to institute common service standards and to execute service policies. Consequently, the government investment becomes not cost-effective and the ratio between input and output of resources becomes disproportionate.6 Absence of national mental health legislation In China, there is yet no nationwide law to protect the rights of people with mental illness and ensure adequate treatment for them. There are also no clear definitions in either psychiatry or law for issues such as guardianship, compulsory treatment, and competency.9 Furthermore, no clear policies exists to prevent unlawful institutionalization, coercive ECT and medication, and inappropriate detention for psychiatry evaluation (in the absence of psychotic symptoms).6 Lack of participation of non-governmental organizations As described earlier, a large component of mental health services in Australia is provided by non-government organizations which are integrated with the governmental agencies. This substantially decreases case load and economic pressure on the public services while complementing the government funded services by filling their gaps. In China, there are very few mental health services provided by non-governmental organizations. SHORT-TERM GOALS — ADDRESSING THE MOST URGENT ISSUES FACED BY THE CHINESE MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM By comparing the mental health service models between China and Australia, several challenges faced by Chinese mental health services are evident. (1) How to improve the accessibility of the mental health service for the general population, especially in the rural areas; (2) How to enhance the quality and efficiency of national mental health services; (3) How to ensure the legal rights of patients with mental illness; and (4) How to change the current hospital-based service model to a community-based model that caters for the individual needs of patients. The mental health system reform in Australia has taken approximately a decade. It is likely that China will take more time to achieve this level of reform given China's current conditions. As China is still a developing country, it is unrealistic to expect to meet the mental health needs of a massive population with limited resources within a short time. Accordingly, it would appear to be practical to implement the reform strategies in several stages. The pressing issues that need to be addressed urgently include improving access to mental health care, increasing mental health literacy, enhancing community workforce skills, establishing a national mental illness database, promulgating a national mental health act and coordinating governmental resources. To meet these challenges, emphasis should not be given to the psychiatric hospitals, especially profit-making institutions. The following are suggestions to address the urgent problems and prepare for a long-term community mental health service model. Improving access to mental health services Policies need to be established to specify the minimum capacity of psychiatric department services, and psychiatric beds to a population ratio based on each county's demographic features and mental health needs. To address the disproportionate workforce, advance training programs should be available complemented by a recruitment scheme from major psychiatric hospitals. With the use of government financial support, community medical clinics can be set up, proportionally staffed according to the local population, with country doctors who are adequately trained to treat common mental illness. They ideally ought to be managed and salaried by the health administrative department rather than the hospital administration. Apart from providing clinical services, they can also promote mental health literacy, education, psychological counseling, early intervention and relapse prevention. Those patients with serious and complicated mental illness would be admitted to the hospital, whose role is to confirm diagnosis, set up a therapeutic plan, provide initial treatment and contain immediate risks. The community clinics can subsequently take responsibility for ongoing treatment and care. Quality control and evaluation policies should be established by the government for accreditation and monitoring purposes. Adequate financial and work incentives should be given, including advanced education opportunities. Resources and facilities for mental health should be advocated within government departments based on the potential and importance of reducing rates of crime and community disturbance attributed to untreated mentally ill patients (e.g. schizophrenia and major psychiatric disorders). Since most Chinese patients with mental illness are reluctant to attend psychiatric hospitals for treatment, general hospitals could become the main mental health service providers. However, psychiatric specialties need to be developed within general hospitals and non-psychiatric doctors would require training by mental health specialists on how to recognize and treat the psychotic patients. Decreasing the costs of medical and psychiatric care Extending health insurance to a greater proportion of the population with a system of universal coverage needs to be explored as a means of increasing affordability of medical treatment. Under the current national situation however, this would prove too challenging and impractical. Access to basic medical care and services could be achieved by a government health tax, designating certain numbers of non-profit medical facilities, and using inexpensive medical technology and essential drugs. A large number of people with major diseases are protected by city-worker basic medical insurance and new rural cooperative medical service system. All workers (whose families are taken as a unit) are required by legislation to participate in this insurance system, where the insurance premium is paid by both the employer and the employee. The government may subsidize poor people to join in such social medical insurance system. In addition, advocacy is needed for the inclusion of mental health related disability to be covered by commercial medical insurance system that is purchased privately. Further, agreements with pharmaceutical companies for low-costs drugs and implementing free medication treatment to the impoverished schizophrenia patients should be considered. Due to the high health costs for such a massive population, limited availability of governmental subsidies and uneven regional economic development, the Chinese government should also allow regional policies for different provinces as long as these policies are in accordance with the national mental health service system. In China, although essential medications are not expensive, the main barrier to care is the hospitalization costs. Hence, if access to treatment is available in the community especially for acute and urgent conditions, the need for hospitalization due to major mental illnesses would inevitably decrease, along with the duration of the hospital stay. Long-term goal — strategies for future reform and development Under the current national situation in China, the strategies suggested above provide only a short-term approach for patients with mental illness. The long-term goal needs to develop into a community-based national mental health system integrating prevention, treatment and rehabilitation services together for the benefit of the general public health. Such a service system requires clear governance and cooperation between the relevant government ministries and departments in an efficient and effective fashion. To achieve this goal, the community-based mental health service model implemented in the State of Victoria, Australia, can be used as a reference. A community mental health service flow chart for Victoria State is shown in Figure 3.Figure 3.: The flow chart of community mental health system.Although numerous difficulties may be encountered China in achieving similar service level, we have to continuously aim for such longer term goals. The key issues needing to be addressed to achieve this long-term goal are discussed as below. Government support A key element of success in the Australian mental health service reform is the existing government support and commitment in at least four aspects: policy, financing, legal and implementation support. In setting up a new mental health service system framework and strategy, policy-makers may need to synthesize the international experiences and China's unique situations to consider the priorities, sustainable development and the effectiveness of the plan. Considerable government investment is needed for a smooth transition and implementation of the plan in shifting mental health resources to community services. At the same time, the Chinese mental health act must be set up as soon as possible to protect the lawful rights of patients with mental illness. The Chinese mental health act draft (the 15th manuscript) had been completed in July 2004. The initial goals of this legal document are to protect patients' basic rights and to improve services for them. Under the law, the patients should have access to proper medical treatment and rehabilitation services that will help them return to normal life gradually.9 It is anticipated that this bill will be officially promulgated soon. Finally, a management system should be instituted where there is adequate accountability, appraisal, surveillance and supervision of the framework implementation. The most successful projects are those that provide jobholders' with regular surveillance and continuing education opportunities.13 Work force training The delivery of mental health service depends heavily on human resources. Mental health professionals need to be adequately trained to evaluate and treat the mental health problems in both the hospital and/or the community settings. Moreover, well-trained mental health professionals are the key to mental health service improvement and promotion of mental health literacy.6 Therefore, to implement a community-based mental health service model, it is crucial for all mental health personnel to take a role in the transition from hospital-based to community-based care through professional training and development. In China there are less than 1.53 per 100 000 population at present in China compared to 14 per 100 000 population in Australia. It is estimated that only 1/5 of 20 000 psychiatrists have received high quality academic training.6 In addition, the various mental health professionals, such as social worker, psychiatric nurse, clinical psychologist, occupational and rehabilitation therapist, are in high demand. Therefore, the training of mental health service related professionals is a key priority which can be addressed in the following ways: (1) Up-scaling the skills of the existing mental health professionals by advanced training in community-based service approaches; (2) Medical colleges and universities may consider increasing their enrollment in related specialties such as general practitioners (GPs), community nurses, social workers, psychologists and rehabilitation therapists; (3) Those undertaking training in colleges/universities would need to meet certain requirements before obtaining certification to meet the various professional standards. Those current professionals working in hospitals should receive continuing medical education and training regularly. Implementing the community-based mental health service model In China, the following issues must be considered in gradually shifting the service from hospital-based model to community-based one. An important goal is to integrate mental health service delivery into the primary health service. The availability of local medical clinics which complement the primary health care system would allow most patients with mental illness to access medical care. Such a service model could provide for prevention, treatment and rehabilitation together. Mental health services should be established in general hospitals and large psychiatric hospitals would need to be reduced in size. The urban model in Shanghai and rural model in Yantai for community service in the 1980's can be reviewed to be adapted into the community-based mental health service model and network in the country.7,14 Mental health service model in urban areas: To improve service access, mental health services need to be geographically based to serve the population within a catchment area. There are several advantages in this approach including the proximity of services to the patients and care-givers, maximizing the use of the local community resources and better integration of hospital and community services. There also needs to be an adequate range of community service components to meet the diverse needs of patients. Such service components may include acute crisis teams, continuing care teams, mobile support teams and homeless outreach teams which are run by a multidisciplinary staff. The role of case managers underpins the community mental health service system. Case managers need to be trained to advocate and coordinate comprehensive patient-centered care. Appropriate community beds should be made available for those who are too disabled to live at home. Mental health service model in rural areas: a three-level mental illness treatment, rehabilitation and prevention network should be established in the countryside, which connects the county, the township and the village. This may include the following: (1) The county level general hospital can establish psychiatric services including inpatient care. (2) The township hospitals may function as the role of the mental health community service centers in rural areas but need to be staffed by mental health professionals; preferably in multidisciplinary areas. Clinical services are provided in addition to early intervention and mental health promotion. Inpatient service could also be set up in township hospitals that lie in high-density population areas. (3) The village medical professionals should be trained to identify common mental illness at least, and to make further referrals promptly if it is needed. They could act as the community doctors to report all mental illness related information to township hospitals which then communicated to relevant departments in the county. This service model is consistent with the “Construction and Development Plan for Countryside Health Service System” issued on August 29, 2006. Applicable to both the urban and rural model, all mental health issues related to every patient should be managed by the case manager. The responsibilities of the case manager include regular contact with the consumer patient and the family members, monitoring the consumer's medicinal compliance and follow-up visits, referring to other appropriate agencies. They are also the first point of contact in case of crisis by the patient and family and for promoting mental health knowledge. Multi-sector services It is desirable to encourage non-governmental organizations to establish mental health service facilities and projects. They could be set up to supplement the government mainstream services. Special projects can be designed for special groups of patients to meet their unique needs. Moreover, once the new project is formulated, a set of systematic standards should be set up to evaluate its effectiveness. Health education Improving mental health literacy among the public is another important goal of mental health care. The lack of mental health knowledge can lead to the delay of early recognition and treatment of the illness. Prejudice and misunderstanding towards mental illness can cause unfair treatment to patients with mental illness in society. From a historical point of view, mental illness patients have often been considered as a threat to social order. They are labeled as social instability factors for fear that they might lose control of their behaviors. This is also one of the reasons that they have been stigmatized once diagnosed with a mental illness. The long-term stigma and labeling towards mental illness has placed psychiatry at a low social status among other heath professions. As a result of this low social status, it is very difficult to recruit well-trained mental health professionals, especially in the countryside. Thus, the government should encourage mass media to publicize mental health knowledge vigorously. In order to change public attitudes towards mental illness, various mass media, such as newspaper, television, broadcast and websites, should report more positive information about them. Excessive reporting on negative news, like the disturbing behavior of patients with mental illness, will instigate more fear among the public against them. CONCLUSIONS In the past 50 years, China's mental health care has had an uneven course. While the whole health care system is under the influence of the economic reform and development, mental health care is facing specific challenges. These challenges include ensuring universal access in the face of widespread lack of coverage, an acute shortage of services particularly in rural areas, improving the quality of care throughout the country, advocating for the rights of the mentally ill and transforming a system of hospital-based care to an efficient community-based system responsive to the specific needs of the patient population.10 Recently, the Chinese central government has put tremendous emphasis on mental health and prioritized it as a key public health issue. The government is implementing its verbal commitment to mental health system reform into practice. The Mental Health Department of the Chinese Health Ministry has organized many Chinese experts to visit Melbourne, Australia to learn the community mental health service model, and some demonstration project work has already been started in China (686 projects). We anticipate that the Chinese government will have a long-term, sustainable commitment to mental health development. At the same time, a complete and comprehensive mental health act that protects the rights of patients with mental illness needs to be formulated and promulgated as soon as possible.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Where is the Path to Recovery when Psychiatric Hospitalization Becomes Too Difficult
Bin Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2012.01.005
2012-01-01
Abstract:The modern history of mental health services in China dates back to the founding of the first psychiatric hospital in Guangzhou by the missionary physician John Kerr in 1898. By the time of liberation in 1949 China's population was already 500 million but there were only 10 mental health institutions, 1 100 psychiatric beds and 50-60 psychiatrists in the country. Health services developed rapidly in the 1950s but by 1957 there were still only 70 psychiatric hospitals with 11 000 beds and less than 500 psychiatrists[1]. As shown in the table 1, the trajectory of the development of mental health services in Europe and the United States was quite different. After a century of increasing rates of chronic institutionalization of the mentally ill, by the mid-1950s the United States had more than 350 psychiatric hospitals with more than 500 000 beds for its population of 150 million and the United Kingdom had 130 psychiatric hospitals with 150 000 beds for its population of 50 million. After this peak there was a period of rapid deinstitutionalization in Western countries that accelerated in the 1960s. This was accompanied by a corresponding increase in community-based social service networks for mentally ill individuals and an expansion of the numbers and types of mental health providers. For example, by 2004 there were 110 000 psychiatric social workers in the United States, more than the combined number of psychiatrists and psychiatric nurses. These changes made it possible to implement legislation that emphasized giving the patient as much autonomy as possible, providing treatment in the least restrictive setting feasible, and replacing involuntary hospitalization with compulsory outpatient or community-based treatment[2]. Table 1. Mental health service resources in Western countries and China in the 1950s and 2000s Despite increasing rates of hospitalization of the mentally ill in China over the last 50 years, by the mid-2000s the per capita number of institutions, beds and providers were still far below those in Western countries that had already undergone substantial downsizing as part of the deinstitutionalization process[1]–[5]. More importantly, lack of financial investment in community health services in China has meant that community mental health services are very limited or non-existent beyond a few large, economically developed municipalities. The development of such services has also been limited by the lack of psychiatric social workers, occupational therapists and clinical psychologists, important members of the multi-disciplinary teams that are needed to provide community-based services. A large-scale pilot project supported by central government aimed at addressing this lack of services started in 2004[6], but there is still a very long way to go. Given the lack of community-based services hospitalization is the only viable option despite the heavy financial burden it places on patients and their families. Traditional Chinese cultural values emphasize the responsibility of families to care for ill family members; in the case of the mentally ill this heavy responsibility is magnified by the social stigmatization of mental illnesses, so families often avoid seeking professional care until the symptoms are so severe that they cannot be managed on an outpatient basis. A nationwide survey in 2002[7] reported that over 80% of all psychiatric hospitalizations in China are involuntary. However, less than one-quarter of these involuntary hospitalizations were because of ‘dangerous behaviors’; the others occurred because the family was unable to manage the patient at home. Some municipalities in China have developed local legislation that addresses the legal issues related to involuntary admission of mentally ill patients. For example, the Shanghai Municipality Regulations on Mental Health implemented in 2002 established clear criteria and procedures for family members to represent the interests of the patient during the admission process, allowing mentally ill individuals to be involuntarily admitted if the family and the treating psychiatrist considered this in the best interests of the patient. This put the long-standing practice of family supervision of hospitalization of the mentally ill into a clear legal framework. Over the nine years since implementing the regulations until the end of 2010 there have been an estimated 145 000 psychiatric admissions throughout Shanghai, but there have only been 11 formal legal complaints about this method of hospitalizing patients. This shows that legally formalizing the traditional practice of having family members coordinate the admissions of severely psychotic patients is feasible in China and can effectively balance the needs of patients, families and the public. The current draft version of China's national mental health law[8] (which, when passed, will supersede current local regulations) does not allow family members to supervise the involuntary admission of non-violent patients—admissions that currently constitute at least 60% of all psychiatric admissions in the country. As currently written the law severely restricts involuntary admissions to cases in which the patient is a clear danger to self or others and gives patients ample opportunity to challenge the psychiatric diagnosis and the decision to require an involuntary admission. Some legal experts are suggesting that the legal provisions need to be even more stringent, recommending that any involuntary admission require the approval of a judge following a court proceeding. As the law gets closer and closer to final passage this part of the comprehensive legislation has stimulated heated debate. Given the inadequate financial support for the provision of psychiatric services, the weak or non-existent community service network and the severe shortage of mental health providers (particularly psychiatric social workers), this drastic restriction of involuntary admission by legal means will inevitably lead to a range of undesirable consequences. The family burden of caring for their mentally ill members will increase. There will be a greater risk of dangerous behavior by patients who lack supervision in the community. Psychiatric hospitals will only admit the most dangerous patients. The stigmatization and discrimination of both the mentally ill and of psychiatric hospitals will get worse. And more legal proceedings (with their associated costs) will be needed to deal with litigation related to complaints about mentally ill individuals. Developing clear legal safeguards that protect patients' autonomy and reduce involuntary hospitalizations is the clear and unwavering goal of all those involved in providing mental health services. However, the current version of the national law places too great an emphasis on patient's self-sufficiency; it gives the impression that prevention of inappropriate psychiatric hospitalization is the central purpose of the law. Introducing legislation focused on patient's autonomy that does not take into consideration of traditional culture, the history of the provision of mental health services, or currently available community resources may not be in the best interests of those suffering from mental illnesses. In protecting patients' independence beyond all other considerations we would be restricting their ability to exercise their other rights, including the right of health, education and work; and, thus, increasing the burden on both the family and society. Is the new direction for service delivery previewed in this draft law going to be a blessing or a curse for patients in China?
-
China Sets Up the Specialised Committee of Mental Health Rehabilitation
Jian-bo Lai,Shao-hua Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30481-x
2020-01-01
Abstract:On Nov 1, 2019, the Specialised Committee of Mental Health Rehabilitation, an institution affiliated to the Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine, was established. Comprising mainly psychiatrists, it is the first national institution aimed at promoting the development of psychiatric rehabilitation in China. However, psychiatric rehabilitation is still in its infancy in China, and a lot of work needs to be done to empower people with mental health problems to live a full life. A nation-wide epidemiological study found that the weighted lifelong prevalence of any psychiatric disorders (excluding dementia) in China was 16·6%.1Huang Y Wang Y Wang H et al.Prevalence of mental disorders in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study.Lancet Psychiatry. 2019; 6: 211-224Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (914) Google Scholar Insufficient mental-health resources (eg, 1·53 psychiatrists per 100 000 people) make psychiatric rehabilitation inaccessible for many patients.2Smith K Mental health: a world of depression.Nature. 2014; 515: 180-181Crossref Scopus (548) Google Scholar How to best match scarce sources to the unmet needs of psychiatric rehabilitation is an urgent issue that needs to be addressed. Nanjing Medical University has tried to address this issue by establishing a mental rehabilitation course to cultivate therapists, and enrolls 60 students into the course every year. In the first 3 years, the undergraduate students learn about rehabilitation medicine and participate in clinical practice. In the latter 2 years, they are trained to be professional rehabilitation therapists for mental health. Another issue is that although some regions have explored different patterns of psychiatric rehabilitation, no well-accepted rehabilitation model exists in mainland China. The clubhouse model (established in Changsha, characterised by community-based, peer-driven, and recovery-oriented mental care), is supported by the Chinese government, but whether it can be widely applied to other regions remains unknown.3Tan YX Yan H Luo YH et al.Mental rehabilitation in China: the clubhouse model.Lancet Psychiatry. 2018; 5: 386-387Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar Because of the imbalance of interregional economic development and different cultural backgrounds, the transition from specialised hospital-based to individual, family, or community-based mental health care is not easy. Patients can feel lost after discharge from hospital, because of residual symptoms, medication-derived side-effects, or social handicaps that hinder their return to normal life. Novel models, such as the e-mental health-care model, might more efficiently deliver psychiatric rehabilitation services to more consumers.4Firth J Torous J Stubbs B et al.The “online brain”: how the internet may be changing our cognition.World Psychiatry. 2019; 18: 119-129Crossref PubMed Scopus (137) Google Scholar Policy makers should provide more support to guide and promote the nationwide implementation of psychiatric rehabilitation. In July, 2019, the State Council announced its Advices on Implementing the Healthy China Initiative, which emphasises the importance of facilitating psychiatric rehabilitation services that are community based.5The State Council of the People's Republic of ChinaAdvices on implementing the healthy China initiative.http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2019-07/15/content_5409492.htmDate: 2019Date accessed: November 4, 2019Google Scholar Adequate funding support from the government is also necessary. Promoting psychiatric rehabilitation in China is a great project beneficial to the nation and its people. The Specialised Committee of Mental Health Rehabilitation has the important responsibility of mobilising financial, educational, and public health resources from all sectors of society, which could ultimately enable people to recover and reclaim their lives. We declare no competing interests. Prevalence of mental disorders in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological studyThe prevalence of most mental disorders in China in 2013 is higher than in 1982 (point prevalence 1·1% and lifetime prevalence 1·3%), 1993 (point prevalence 1·1% and lifetime prevalence 1·4%), and 2002 (12-month prevalence 7·0% and lifetime prevalence 13·2%), but lower than in 2009 (1-month prevalence 17·5%). The evidence from this survey poses serious challenges related to the high burdens of disease identified, but also offers valuable opportunities for policy makers and health-care professionals to explore and address the factors that affect mental health in China. Full-Text PDF
-
Development and Challenges of Mental Health in China
Jianyu Que,Lin Lu,Le Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2019-100053
2019-01-01
General Psychiatry
Abstract:With the socioeconomic development and the acceleration of the ageing process of the population, the incidence rates of mental disorders and psycho-behavioural problems have become higher and higher worldwide. So far, the disease burden caused by mental disorders has ranked second in the world.1 In China, the disease burden caused by mental disorders accounts for 13% of all non-communicable diseases burden.2 Hence, mental health has become a major public health problem and social problem. In order to promote mental health, the Chinese government has promulgated a series of policies and regulations, as well as reform measures. Moreover, the upcoming ‘China Brain Project’ will also focus on some mental disorders such as autism, depression and dementia to improve mental health research in China. ### Mental health services #### High prevalence of mental disorders and low consultation rate The epidemiological survey conducted in four provinces in China showed that the prevalence of mental disorders among adults in China was 17.5%, in which the prevalence of mood disorders (mainly depression), anxiety disorders and substance use disorders were 6.1%, 5.6% and 5.9%, respectively.3 According to the WHO report, the recognition rate of global mental disorders is around 50%, and the recognition rate in China is far below the world average. Taking depression as an example, the recognition rate of depression was only 21% in Shanghai, China. In addition, the rate of diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders is also relatively low, with an average of only around 150 people per 100 000 people receiving treatment for serious mental disorders. The treatment rate for serious mental disorders in high-income countries is about 17 times that of low-income countries.4 #### High proportion of refractory mental disorders and poor medications response The effectiveness of medications treating mental disorders varies among patients. For example, when one patient with schizophrenia treated with aripiprazole gains improvement, about four patients cannot benefit from the same medication. When duloxetine is effective in treating …
-
Australian community and inpatient general public sector mental health services between 2017–18 and 2021–22: Relative stasis in bed capacity, increasing outpatient demand, and stunted expenditure
Hayden Cornell,Stephen Allison,Tarun Bastiampillai,Stephen R Kisely,Jeffrey CL Looi,Matthew Brazel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562241292428
2024-11-07
Australasian Psychiatry
Abstract:Australasian Psychiatry, Ahead of Print. ObjectiveTo descriptively analyse Australian public sector General Mental Health Services (GMHS) expenditure, ambulatory, and inpatient services, including key performance indicators (KPIs) in comparison with other subspeciality mental health services (MHS).MethodWe descriptively analysed data published by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), including inpatient, ambulatory services, expenditure, and KPIs.ResultsFrom 2017–18 to 2021–22, per capita expenditure for Australian GMHS (18–64) rose by an average annual inflation-adjusted change of 2%. Overall bed numbers remained static, with non-acute beds declining, and commensurate expansion of acute beds. Community GMHS had high outpatient utilisation, with high rates of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar affective disorders as primary diagnoses in mid-life. From 2017–18 to 2021–22, GMHS inpatient and ambulatory episodes had decreasing rates of significant improvement and increasing rates of significant deterioration.ConclusionsAlthough GMHS has the highest overall population and service utilisation, there has been static bed availability and relatively small increases in expenditure which are occurring concurrently with worsening clinical outcomes. Evidence-based modelling of GMHS and outcomes is required to inform future service improvement.
psychiatry
-
Integrated mental health services in China: challenges and planning for the future.
Di Liang,Vickie M Mays,Wei-Chin Hwang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx137
2018-01-01
Health Policy and Planning
Abstract:Eager to build an integrated community-based mental health system, in 2004 China started the '686 Programme', whose purpose was to integrate hospital and community services for patients with serious mental illness. In 2015, the National Mental Health Working Plan (2015-2020) proposed an ambitious strategy for implementing this project. The goal of this review is to assess potential opportunities for and barriers to successful implementation of a community-based mental health system that integrates hospital and community mental health services into the general healthcare system. We examine 7066 sources in both English and Chinese: the academic peer-reviewed literature, the grey literature on mental health policies, and documents from government and policymaking agencies. Although China has proposed a number of innovative programmes to address its mental health burden, several of these proposals have yet to be fully activated, particularly those that focus on integrated care. Integrating mental health services into China's general healthcare system holds great promise for increased access to and quality improvement in mental health services, as well as decreased stigma and more effective management of physical and mental health comorbidities. This article examines the challenges to integrating mental health services into China's general healthcare system, especially in the primary care sphere, including: accurately estimating mental health needs, integrating mental and physical healthcare, increasing workforce development and training, resolving interprofessional issues, financing and funding, developing an affordable and sustainable mental health system, and delivering care to specific subpopulations to meet the needs of China's diverse populace. As China's political commitment to expanding its mental health system is rapidly evolving, we offer suggestions for future directions in addressing China's mental health needs.
-
Promotion of Mental Health Rehabilitation in China: Community- Based Mental-Health Services
Youwei Zhu,Xu Li,Min Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/2712-7672-2020-1-1-21-27
2020-01-01
Abstract:Community-based mental health services are important for the treatment and recovery of patients with mental health disorders. The Chinese government has made the establishment of a highly efficient community-based health service an enduring priority. Since the 1960s, community-based mental health services have been developed in many Chinese cities and provinces. National policies, including mental health regulations and five-year national mental health working plans, have been issued to support the development of quality of mental health services. The accessibility and efficiency of community-based mental health services are now highly promoted to community residents. According to the National Standards for Primary Public Health Services, community-based mental health services are one of the most important components of primary public health services. They are mainly provided via Community Health Service Centres (CHCs), by a combination of general practitioners, public health physicians, nurses and social workers. Patients receive individualized and continuous health services according to their rehabilitation status. These services include regular physical examination, health education, rehabilitation guidance, social function rehabilitation training, vocational training and referral services; family members also receive care and psychological support. Future work will focus on expanding mental health service coverage and usage, increasing awareness of mental health and decreasing stigma, and strengthening service capability to establish an integrated model to enhance the overall efficiency of mental health services.
-
Time to invest in developing community mental health services
Paul O'Halloran,Nick O'Connor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1039856215609758
Abstract:Objectives: To report on the evaluation of publicly funded community mental health services in two New South Wales health districts. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative data from 28 publicly funded adult community mental health teams in two NSW health districts were gathered using structured interviews, benchmarking surveys, focus groups and online questionnaires. Results: The community mental health services studied lacked a coherent strategic and recovery oriented framework or model of care for service delivery. There was evidence of poor role definition at the team level, resulting in duplication and inefficiency. There were inadequate staffing levels for stated objectives, a lack of training and continuing education in evidence based intervention, poor consumer and family participation in service design, and no development and monitoring of meaningful outcome measures. Conclusions: This review and benchmarking study highlights the need for mental health policy implementation to be further supported with: development of a service delivery framework outlining essential components of a specialist community mental health system; operational guidance to enable effective team specialisation in accordance with research; investment in practitioner training to support the development of evidence based practice; and processes to ensure effective consumer and carer participation in developing recovery oriented services.
-
An important pathway of mental health service reform in China:introduction of 686 Program
MA Hong,LIU Jin,HE Yan-Ling,XIE Bin,XU Yi-Feng,HAO Wei,TANG Hong-Yu,ZHANG Ming-Yuan,YU Xin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2011.10.002
2011-01-01
Abstract:This paper comprehensively describes the main contents and outcomes of National Continuing Management and Intervention Program for Psychoses(686 Program) which has been developed for seven years.With a new hospital-community integrated service model,this program has actually covered 0.33 billion general population in 680 districts/counties,160 cities.Above 280000 patients suffering from psychoses were registered,200000 person-times received regular follow-up,94000 person-times received free medication,and 12400 person-times were given a subsidy for hospitalization.The statistic results of five consecutive years(From January 2006 to April 2011) showed that the proportion of followed up patients in stable condition increased from a baseline of 67.0% to 90.7% in the fifth year;the rate of violating social security regulations declined from 4.8% to 0.5%,while that committing crimes reduced from 1.5% to 0.Meanwhile,the radius of mental health care outreached to an average of 74 kilometers from the hospitals.About 382000 persons and 525000 person times were trained as members of multi-functional team,in which 10000 were psychiatrists that accounting for half of all psychiatrists in China.Currently,above 70000 persons are participating in 686 Program,including psychiatric personnel and other medical personnel in the ratio of 1:7.25,which means mental health service team nationwide has been enlarged to 7 times during the past seven years.
-
Disparities in Mental Health Care Utilization among Inpatients in Various Types of Health Institutions: a Cross-Sectional Study Based on EHR Data in Shanghai, China.
Jianwei Shi,Lan Tang,Limei Jing,Jinsong Geng,Rui Liu,Li Luo,Ning Chen,Qian Liu,Xin Gong,Xiaojie Bo,Yan Yang,Zhaoxin Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7343-7
IF: 4.5
2019-01-01
BMC Public Health
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Reform of the health care system in China has prompted concerns about the utilization of mental health services. This study aims to compare the utilization of mental health services among inpatients in various types of health institutions in Shanghai (community health care centres, secondary general hospitals, tertiary general hospitals, and specialty hospitals). METHODS:Based on electronic health record (EHR) data, we extracted all of the mental hospitalization data from various types of public health institutions in Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China, from 2013 to 2016. The distribution of mentally ill inpatients and the possible factors contributing to the observed differences in these institutions were analysed. RESULTS:Specialty psychiatric hospitals in Pudong New Area, Shanghai, admitted more inpatients and treated in patients with more severe disorders (49.73%). However, those who were male (OR = 0.545), were elderly (OR = 20.133), had inferior insurance (urban social insurance for citizens: OR = 4.013; paying themselves, OR = 29.489), had a longer length of stay (OR = 1.001) and had lower costs (OR = 0.910) were more likely to choose community health centres than specialty hospitals. Those who preferred the secondary and tertiary hospitals to the specialty ones were more likely to be in the male, elderly, married, shorter length of stay and higher-cost groups. Notably, compared to those with urban social insurance for workers, those who had urban social insurance for citizens (OR = 3.136) or paid out-of-pocket (OR = 9.822) were significantly clustered in the tertiary hospitals rather than the specialty hospitals. CONCLUSIONS:Inpatients who were male, were older, had inferior insurance, had a longer length of stay and had lower costs preferred the elementary health services. However, the utilization of mental health care in high-tier institutions reflected defects, especially the fact that the current health insurance system does not adequately restrict patients' choices, and those who paid more tended to choose tertiary hospitals instead of professional specialty ones. We suggest that psychiatric services should be enhanced by instituting reforms, including public education, improved health insurance, a forceful referral system, and competency reinforcement for primary care physicians, to provide a more integrated mental health system.
-
What Will the Development of Psychiatry in China Be in 10 Years?
Shenxun Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2018-100025
2019-01-01
General Psychiatry
Abstract:The essence of my talk is to identify the changes in psychiatric clinical services over this designated time and illustrate my personal conjecture on what the field of psychiatry will be like in 10 years’ time. To put it simply, that is to tell the difference between visiting a psychiatrist today and visiting one 10 years from now. The main pieces of a doctor's visit are the patient, the doctor, plus the space for the visit (ie, the hospital). The content of a doctor’s visit is diagnosis and treatment. First, let’s look at the conditions of the medical services and services of today’s psychiatric departments, followed by reviewing our service status (ie, our current mental health service capacity broken into number of hospitals, hospital beds, doctors and nurses that we have for psychiatry). According to the 2015 National Mental Health Resource Survey,1 the service capacity of psychiatry in China currently has the characteristics of ‘three less and one poor’. The ‘three less’ signifies the insufficiency of psychiatric professional institutions, psychiatric specialist beds and psychiatric specialists, whereas ‘one poor’ represents that the conditions of existing psychiatric professional institutions are worse than those of general hospitals and other specialised hospitals. At present, there are nearly 3000 mental health service institutions in China, including psychiatric specialist hospitals, general hospital psychiatry, primary healthcare institutions, general clinics, mental health clinics and rehabilitation hospitals. Among them, psychiatric specialist hospitals and psychiatric units in general hospitals account for 85% of the total number. There are only about 430 000 psychiatric beds and nearly 30 000 psychiatry specialists in China, which is far from meeting the growing needs.1 Furthermore, there is a large shortage in the supply of specialist psychotherapists, psychological counsellors, rehabilitation physicians, social workers and public health professionals. Seventy-eight per cent of the existing …
-
Integration of Hospital and Community Services-the '686 Project'-is a Crucial Component in the Reform of China's Mental Health Services.
Hong Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2012.03.007
2012-01-01
Abstract:Prior to 2005 China's mental health services were provided in the same manner as the other types of health services in the country. The hospital was the center of the service delivery network so medical staff only provided services to those who came to the hospital and there was no continuity between hospital services and community services. This delivery system did not provide preventive services and was not flexible enough to meet the changing needs of patients as they recovered from chronic illnesses. Mental health services also suffered from severe understaffing, the limited range of professionals who provided services (primarily doctors and nurses) and poor facilities. These problems made it very difficult to meet the mental health needs of the nation, particularly the needs of those with severe mental illnesses.[1],[2] Starting in the 1950's a variety of models had been developed in different parts of the country to address the difficult issue of managing persons with serious mental illnesses. The ‘Three-Level Prevention Network Model’ developed in Shanghai, the ‘Hospital and Community Integration Model’ developed in the Haidian District of Beijing and the ‘Yantai Model’ developed in Shandong Province all tried to improve the management of persons with serious mental illnesses by developing different types of community support services. All three models proved effective over the short-term but the demands of the market economy that emerged over the 1990's rendered the Beijing and Shandong models unviable; only the Shanghai model has survived to the present.[3] After the SARS outbreak in 2003 the government invested heavily in an effort to completely rebuild the under-resourced public health system. Among the many projects funded in the years immediately after SARS, the only non-infectious disease project was one on the treatment and management of severe mental illnesses: the ‘Central Government Support for the Local Management and Treatment of Severe Mental Illnesses Project’. In December 2004 the project received its first financial allotment of 6.86 million Renminbi ($829 000 in 2004 dollars) and was subsequently referred to as the ‘686 Project’.[4] The project was modeled on the WHO's recommended method for integrating hospital-based and community-based mental health services. The main tasks included improving communities' ability to prevent, treat, and manage serious mental illness; decreasing the societal and economic costs of disruptive behaviors by individuals with mental illness; enhancing hospitals' ability to provide preventive mental health services; and improving healthcare providers' professional skills in providing standardized treatment for serious mental illnesses. The specific goals of the project were to a) establish an integrated identification and treatment system for individuals with mental illnesses who are potentially violent or disruptive; b) increase treatment rates for persons with serious mental illnesses; c) increase community awareness about the characteristics and treatment options for persons with severe mental illnesses; d) increase the rates of successful recovery and rehabilitation; and e) alleviate the pain and suffering of patients and their family members. In 2005 the project established 60 demonstration sites (one demonstration urban site and one demonstration rural site each in 30 provinces, independent municipalities and autonomous regions) around the country. Each site had a minimum population of 400 000 individuals and the total catchment population was 43 million persons, about 1/30th of the national population. Over the next three years of ongoing experimentation a successful model for moving the focus of treatment from the hospital to the community was developed. The components of the intervention included patient registration and initial assessment, free medication and regular follow-up in the community, management of community emergencies, and free emergency hospitalization. The project identified and treated many patients who had previously been locked up in their homes by family members. As part of this process of implementing the project a large number of training materials for different types of personnel were developed. By 2008 the model was considered sufficiently mature to merit scaling-up to the whole country. By the end of 2010 a total of 280 000 persons with serious mental illnesses had been registered in the system, 200 000 follow-up visits of registered patients had been conducted, free medication was provided 94 000 times and free treatment had been provided 12 400 times.[5] By the end of November 2011 there were 766 communities in 170 municipalities providing these services. From 2005 to 2011 the total governmental investment in the program was 280 million Renminbi ($41 million in 2009 dollars). The rate of ‘creating disturbances’ among patients who participated in the program dropped from 4.8% in January 2006 to 0.5% in April 2011; the rate of ‘causing serious accidents’ decreased from 1.5% to 0.0% over the same period. The theoretical coverage by the end of 2011 was 743 million individuals (about 57% of the total population) but some of the sites were not operating as planned so the actual coverage was much less, about 391 million individuals (30% of the population). [Unpublished 2011 annual report of the National Office for Managing and Treating Serious Mental Illnesses.] The 686 project has become China's largest demonstration project and implementation research effort in mental health. It has used China-specific methods and procedures and, thus, made a very substantial contribution to the development of mental health services in the country. The Chinese-specific characteristics are reflected in the organization of the project: at every level the government supervises the project, health administrators manage the project, and other departments provide ancillary assistance as needed. The overall goal is the control of serious mental illnesses and the strategy to achieve this objective is the prevention and treatment of persons with mental illnesses. The basic services are provided in urban and rural communities with the back-up support of psychiatric specialists.[6] The 686 project has made several important contributions that will help promote the overall reform of mental health services in China. It has provided a rich database of experiences in community-based health reform which is extremely valuable in the development and promotion of mental health policy. It has promoted a more comprehensive approach to the treatment of mental illnesses, an approach that is more integrated, that includes multifunctional treatment teams, that is less focused on symptoms and more focused on functioning, and that pays less attention to patients' disabilities and more attention to enhancing their strengths. It has increased access to services for persons with serious mental illnesses. The median radius of the service network at each service site increased from 56 kilometers in 2005 to 184 kilometers in 2011. It has dramatically expanded the number of persons providing services to individuals with serious mental illnesses. By the end of 2011 the training sessions for the project had involved 382 000 individuals who attended training sessions a total of 525 000 times. The 180 953 staff members involved in the project had expended a total of 52 142 years of effort; among them 4949 psychiatrists (approximately 1/3rd of all psychiatrists in the country) had expended 2568 years of effort, 6480 psychiatric nurses had expended 3401 years of effort, and—most importantly—169 524 non-mental health professionals expended 46 173 years of effort. Thus the participation of these non-mental health professionals resulted in a 7-fold increase in the available manpower to provide services for the seriously mentally ill. The proportion of patients with severe mental illnesses who remain stable has increased. At baseline 67.0% of patients had been stable (i.e., without relapses of acute symptoms) for 5 years or longer; by the end of 2011 this proportion had increased to 90.7%. The 686 project has established a ongoing national database on persons with serious mental illnesses that will be invaluable in the development and assessment of policies and services.[7] As the 686 project continues to expand and becomes a standard part of treatment for persons with serious mental illnesses, the challenges of integrating this new type of service into the traditional service network become more and more evident. Traditional methods of treating and managing mental illnesses, of training mental health clinicians, and of conducting mental health research have not kept pace with the rapid rate with which the government is changing mental health policy and practice. The pressure on mental health professionals to update their theoretical models and clinical practices is enormous.
-
Pathways to psychiatric care of patients from rural regions: a general-hospital-based study.
Xuemei Li,Weijun Zhang,Yan Lin,Xiulan Zhang,Zhiyong Qu,Xiaohua Wang,Yurong Zhang,Huiwen Xu,Shuliang Zhao,Yafang Li,Donghua Tian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764013485364
2013-01-01
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Pathway studies highlight the help-seeking behaviours of patients with physical and mental illness. A number of these studies have been completed in other countries, but there have been few reports from China. Therefore, this study was planned to explore the characteristics of the help-seeking pathways of patients with mental illness from rural regions of China through the mental health professionals and treatment at the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army (PLAGH).
METHODS:The pathway diagrams were documented for 203 subjects with various mental disorders using the translated version of the World Health Organization (WHO) pathway encounter form. The patterns of help-seeking and durations were analysed, and the χ(2) test and Mann-Whitney U test were employed as needed.
RESULTS:On average, each patient consulted 3.6 caregivers. The vast majority of patients first visited local secondary general hospitals (SGHs) (35.5%, χ(2) = 41.93, p < .0001) or local tertiary general hospitals (TGHs) (32%, χ(2) = 36.21, p < .0001); however, 75.4% of them had not received professional diagnosis and treatment. The patients who first contacted the psychiatric service, finally reached the PLAGH, because of poor treatment or the high cost of medical care.
CONCLUSION:The subjects first seek the help of various sources before attending PLAGH due to a lack of awareness of the treatment services and the fear of the stigma associated with mental disorders. The primary care, even the local general hospital, did not act as a gatekeeper to psychiatric services.
-
Public mental health services in Southern China and related health outcomes among individuals living with severe mental illness
Dan Qiu,Yilu Li,Shuiyuan Xiao,Liang Zhou,Lianzhong Liu,Huiming Liu,Feihong Gao,Qiuyan Wu,Yanni An,Zixuan Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-024-00363-0
2024-08-29
Abstract:Background: Although national policies in China are comprehensive and instructive, a wide disparity exists between different cities. The current status of public mental health services by region in China remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate policies related to public mental health services, the contact coverage of public mental health services and outcomes of service users. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in Southern China, between April 2021 and March 2022. Considering the geographical location, socioeconomic development levels, and prevalence of severe mental illness, four cities including Wuhan, Changsha, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen were selected. Relevant service providers were asked to report data on mental health policies and facility-related information, including mental health resources, registration rates of patients, management rates of patients, and medication rates of patients. Eligible patients were invited to report service user-related data, including contact coverage of public mental health services and their outcomes. SPSS 26.0 was used for data analysis. Results: The four cities in Southern China have made different efforts to develop public mental health services, primarily focusing on socio-economically disadvantaged individuals. Community health centers in Guangzhou and Shenzhen reported having more professional human resources on mental health and higher mental health budgets for patients. The contact coverage rates of most public mental services were higher than 80%. Patients in Changsha (B = 0.3; 95%CI: 0.1-0.5), Guangzhou (B = 0.2; 95%CI: 0.1-0.3), and Shenzhen (B = 0.3; 95%CI: 0.1-0.4) who received social medical assistance services reported higher levels of medication adherence. Patients in Wuhan (B = -6.5; 95%CI: -12.9--0.1), Guangzhou (B = -2.8; 95%CI: -5.5--0.1), and Shenzhen who received community-based rehabilitation services reported lower levels of disability (B = -2.6; 95%CI: -4.6--0.5). Conclusions: There have been advances in public mental health services in the four Southern cities. The contact coverage rates of most public mental health services were higher than 80%. Patients' utilization of public mental services was associated with better health outcomes. To improve the quality of public mental health services, the government should try to engage service users, their family members, and supporters in the design, delivery, operationalization, and evaluation of these public mental health services in the future.
-
Balancing hospital and community treatment: effectiveness of an extended-hours community mental health team in a semi-rural region of australia
Daphne Habibis,Mike Hazelton,Rosemary Schneider,John Davidson,Alison Bowling
Abstract:Objective: To examine the effectiveness of the introduction of a community mental health team on consumer psychosocial outcomes. Design: Longitudinal panel design. Setting: District general hospital in a semi-rural region of Australia. Numbers: Two matched groups (n = 37 in each group) Main outcome measure: These included: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Global Assessment Scale (GAS), Rosenberg Self-Esteem, Life Skills Profile as well as self-report. Results: The study found that the introduction of the new service resulted in few significant differences in consumer outcomes. Conclusions: The paper argues that because the state was the only specialist mental health service provider and it was unable to offer assertive community treatment, hospital care remained central. Evidence that a substantial proportion of consumers and carers preferred hospital to community care is placed against this background. The paper argues that in regions like these, where community-based services are likely to remain underdeveloped, it may be best to maintain quality hospital services and to target community services more precisely on what is achievable rather than developing community services at the expense of hospital care. What is already known: Studies on the efficacy of assertive community treatment suggest that it can lead to improved consumer outcomes. However, these studies are usually in urban settings and involve experimental teams. In many rural and regional areas community treatment teams offer standard rather than assertive community care. It is therefore important to investigate the effectiveness of community treatment teams in rural and regional Australia. What this study adds: This study suggests that in rural and regional areas characterised by limited resources, it is too much to expect community treatment teams to have a measurable impact on consumer outcomes. In these settings hospital care remains at the heart of the service. This means that regions such as these need to focus their community services on what is achievable given the level of resources and social ecology. For example, they may need to consider offering either crisis intervention or rehabilitation services and to rely on innovations, such as telehealth or strategic alliances with other service providers to fill the gap.
-
Mental Health System in China: History, Recent Service Reform and Future Challenges.
Jin Liu,Hong Ma,Yan-Ling He,Bin Xie,Yi-Feng Xu,Hong-Yu Tang,Ming Li,Wei Hao,Xiang-Dong Wang,Ming-Yuan Zhang,Chee H. Ng,Margaret Goding,Julia Fraser,Helen Herrman,Helen F. K. Chiu,Sandra S. Chan,Edmond Chiu,Xin Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00059.x
2011-01-01
World Psychiatry
Abstract:This paper summarizes the history of the development of Chinese mental health system; the current situation in the mental health field that China has to face in its effort to reform the system, including mental health burden, workforce and resources, as well as structural issues; the process of national mental health service reform, including how it was included into the national public health program, how it began as a training program and then became a treatment and intervention program, its unique training and capacity building model, and its outcomes and impacts; the barriers and challenges of the reform process; future suggestions for policy; and Chinese experiences as response to the international advocacy for the development of mental health.
-
Community-Based Management and Treatment Services for Psychosis - China, 2019.
Miaomiao Zhao,Ning Ma,Xun Wang,Xiamin Wu,Wufang Zhang,Runzi Chen,Yulu Wang,Lili Guan,Hong Ma,Xin Yu,Lin Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2020.217
2020-01-01
China CDC Weekly
Abstract:Introduction: Community-based services for psychosis are an important part of mental health services in China. We analyzed community-based follow-up and treatment services for psychosis in China in 2019 to provide evidence for policymaking and services delivering. Methods: Data from the National Information System for Psychosis were used to analyze usage of the information system and the registration, management, and treatment situation of patients with psychosis in China in 2019 and compared the results of 2019 with that of 2018. Results: In 2019, 100% of cities and counties used the information system and 6,230,157 patients were registered. In 2019, there were 5,944,724 registered patients (94.05%) in China under community-based follow-up services and 5,375,252 patients (85.04%) had regular follow-ups; 5,295,657 patients (83.78%) were treated by taking antipsychotics and 3,354,251 (53.07%) patients took medication regularly; 4,974,314 patients at home (87.81%) were in stable condition; and there was a significant difference in patients' stable condition and medication-taking rates among eastern, central, and western regions (p<0.05). Compared with 2018, the nationwide regular management rate, medication-taking rate, regular medication-taking rate, and patients' stable rate increased by 2.35%, 2.48%, 11.29%, and 7.21% respectively. Conclusions and Implications for Public Health Practice: Compared with 2018, the level of management and treatment improved significantly but still needs to be further strengthened, especially in western China.
-
Psychiatric services in China: or, Mao versus Freud
F Allodi,J Dukszta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/070674377802300603
Abstract:Reportedly, the People's Republic of China has made great progress in health care services, particularly at preventive, primary and community levels. Information on their psychiatric services is still scarce. A group of 12 health professionals visited the country for three weeks in July 1977. This paper provides a description and an analysis of the network of mental health services using a sample of one mental hospital, six general hospitals and a number of health units in cities, factories and communes. The basic principles of policy and administration are those of a collective socialism with strong central guidelines and considerable local administrative initiative. Admissions to the mental hospital in Shanghai reveal that 83% are young acute schizophrenic cases and very few are neurotic or non-psychotic. This distribution stands in great contrast with admissions to mental hospitals in the West, as is the case in Canada, where schizophrenics represent only 12% of all first admissions to mental hospitals and non-psychotic or minor conditions amount to two-thirds. An impressionistic survey of Chinese traditional medicine rooms in general hospitals revealed that a good proportion of their cases (60-70%) are diagnosed as suffering from minor organic or vague organic conditions without evidence of organic pathology and which in the West would be considered as neurotic or psychosomatic conditions. Outside the institutions, in the communes of the rural and urban areas behavioural, interpersonal and family problems are not defined specifically as mental health problems, but handled within the moral and political ideology prevalent in the country. None of the general hospitals visited had a psychiatric unit, but every patient in every hospital or health unit in the cities and countryside received a combination of traditional Chinese medicine (herbal preparations, acupuncture and moxibustion) besides the Western or modern type of treatment. Officially mental illness is not considered a major problem and it is given very low priority in medical school curricula or in the planning of health services. It is concluded that psychiatric services in China are concerned primarily with cases of psychosis and severe neurosis, that neuroses are viewed as general health problems, and personality and behaviour disorders are considered social or community matters.
-
Mental health services provided in general hospitals in Beijing
AN Jing,ZHANG Ya-Li,LI Xian-Yun,TONG Yong-Sheng,LIANG Hong,WANG Shao-Li,YANG Fu-De,ZHAO Li-Ting,YUE Lin-Lin,XU Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2013.02.002
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore mental health services provided in general hospitals of Beijing in 2009.Methods:The self-made questionnaire was distributed to 272 general hospitals in Beijing,covering the information on the general situation,categories of mental health services,characteristics of mental health service providers,and the use of psychiatric prescription in general hospital in 2009.Results:Totally 111(40.8%) general hospitals finished the questionnaire,in which 43(38.7%) hospitals provided at least one type of mental health service,36(32.4%) hospitals provided outpatient services.Neurosis(30.1%) and affective disorders(29.9%) were the two most common diagnoses among the first visit outpatients.Only 20(18%) general hospitals have the consultations services.Mental health providers with primary or without professional level accounted for 63.9% and those with a degree lower than Bachelor accounted for 69.9%.The proportion of individuals who had provided mental health services for less than five years was 41.9%.Those who received mental health training less than 12 months accounted for 44.2% and never received the training accounted for 11.6%.The mental health providers in the tertiary general hospitals had a much higher education level,a much longer duration of training and higher professional title than those in the primary or secondary general hospitals(P<0.01).Conclusion:It suggests that the mental health services provided in general hospitals of Beijing is limited,especially in the primary and secondary general hospitals.It is necessary to enhance the professional training of the staff in general hospitals.
-
The development of mental hospitals in China from 2002 to 2016
Jianyu Que,Le Shi,Jiajia Liu,Yankun Sun,Yanping Bao,Lin Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7884.2019.02.007
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To overview the development of mental hospitals in China over the past 15 years and provide evidence for making policy decisions and allocating resources.Methods The data of health resources and medical service in mental hospitals were extracted from China Health Statistics Yearbook,and pooled and analyzed by excel and SPSS20.0.Results Medical resources:(1) From 2002 to 2016,the health budget allocated to mental hospitals remained stable in China,ranging from 2% to 3%.(2) The number of mental hospitals increased from 583 in 2002 to 1 026 in 2016.Compared to public hospitals,the number of private hospitals increased faster (x2=191.107,P<0.01).(3) The median numbers of psychiatric beds in mental hospitals were 0.73 per 10 000 population in 2002 and 2.15 per 10 000 population in 2016.(4) The numbers of doctors and nurses in mental hospitals increased from 1.27 per 100 000 and 1.97 per 100 000 in 2002 to 2.15 per 100 000 and 4.55 per 100 000 in 2016 respectively.Medical service:(1) The numbers of visits and inpatients in mental hospitals increased from 10 340.1thousand and 425.4 thousand in 2002 to 35 009.2 thousand and 1 751.2 thousand in 2016.(2) The beds utilization ratio increased to 95.5% in 2016 from 79.0% in 2002.(3) There were only 2.53 daily visits and 4.58 daily inpatients per doctor in 2002,which have risen to 4.70 and 9.57 in 2016 respectively.Conclusion The mental health hospitals,psychiatric beds and psychiatric staff in China have dramatically increased from 2002 to 2016,and more and more people were seeking psychiatric medical services by years.Whereas,there are still some problems that need to be solved such as still low financial input given the heavier medical burden.
-
Patterns of Mental Health Service Utilisation: A Population-Based Linkage of Over 17 Years of Health Administrative Records
Crystal Man Ying Lee,Kevin Chai,Peter M. McEvoy,Kyran Graham-Schmidt,Daniel Rock,Kim S. Betts,Justin Manuel,Mathew Coleman,Shiv Meka,Rosa Alati,Suzanne Robinson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01300-8
2024-06-13
Community Mental Health Journal
Abstract:A cross-sectoral partnership was formed in 2021 in support of the recommendations in an audit on access to state-funded mental health services. In this first paper, we aimed to describe the demographic and service utilisation of adults with a mental health diagnosis in the Western Australian state-funded health system from 2005 to 2021. Inpatient, emergency department, specialised (ambulatory) community mental health service, and death records were linked in individuals aged ≥ 18 years with a mental health diagnosis in Western Australia. Altogether, 392,238 individuals with at least one mental health service contact between 1st January 2005 and 31st December 2021 were included for analysis. Females, Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people, and those who lived outside major cities or in the most disadvantaged areas were more likely to access state-funded mental health services. While the number of individuals who accessed community mental health services increased over time (from 28,769 in 2005 to 50,690 in 2021), the percentage increase relative to 2005 was notably greater for emergency department attendances (127% for emergency department; 76% for community; and 63% for inpatient). Conditions that contributed to the increase for emergency department were mainly alcohol disorder, reaction to severe stress and adjustment disorders, and anxiety disorders. Sex differences were observed between conditions. The pattern of access increased for emergency department and the community plus emergency department combination. This study confirmed that the patterns of access of state-funded mental health services have changed markedly over time and the potential drivers underlying these changes warrant further investigation.
public, environmental & occupational health,psychiatry,health policy & services