Abstract:Objective: Two pivotal Australian Government primary mental health reforms are the Access to Allied Psychological Services (ATAPS) projects, introduced in July 2001 and implemented by Divisions of General Practice, and the Better Access to Psychiatrists, Psychologists and GPs through the Medicare Benefits Schedule (Better Access) programme, introduced in November 2006. This research explores the reciprocal impact of the uptake of psychological treatment delivered by these two initiatives and the impact of location (rurality and socioeconomic profile) on the uptake of both programmes since the inception of the Better Access programme. ATAPS session delivery, before and after the introduction of the Better Access program, is also examined. Method: General Practice Division-level data sources included a minimum dataset containing uptake data of ATAPS services, Medicare Benefits Schedule uptake data supplied by the Medicare Benefits Branch of the Department of Health and Ageing, a Rural, Remote and Metropolitan Area classification, and Indices for Relative Socio Economic Disadvantage (IRSD). Regression analyses were conducted to examine the reciprocal impact of the two programmes and the impact of rurality and socioeconomic status up to December 2008. Results: A dramatic uptake of Better Access sessions, particularly in urban areas, coincided with a temporary reduction in sessions provided under ATAPS, with an overall small positive relationship detected between the two programmes. A greater proportion of ATAPS sessions (45%) have been delivered in rural areas compared with Better Access (18%). The combination of socioeconomic profile, rurality, and Better Access sessions accounted for a small but significant percentage of variance (7%) in the number of ATAPS sessions delivered, with a non-significant independent contribution of Better Access sessions to the prediction of ATAPS sessions. Weak but significant relationships between ATAPS sessions and each of socioeconomic profile (r = 0.22) and rurality (r = -0.24), respectively, were identified. In comparison, socioeconomic profile, rurality, and ATAPS sessions accounted for a much larger and significant percentage of variance (46%) in number of Better Access sessions delivered, with a non-significant independent contribution of ATAPS sessions to the prediction of Better Access sessions. Moderate significant relationships between Better Access sessions and each of socioeconomic profile (r = 0.46) and rurality (r = -0.66), respectively, were identified. The introduction of Better Access appears to have halted the steady increase in the number of ATAPS sessions previously observed. This finding should be interpreted alongside the fact that ATAPS funding is capped. Conclusions: The findings are policy relevant. ATAPS projects have been successfully providing equity of geographic and socioeconomic access for consumers most in need of subsidized psychological treatment. The uptake of psychological treatment under Better Access has been dramatic, suggesting that the programme is addressing an unmet need.

Australian community and inpatient general public sector mental health services between 2017–18 and 2021–22: Relative stasis in bed capacity, increasing outpatient demand, and stunted expenditure

Policy implications of the 2020–22 Australian study of mental health and wellbeing

Patterns of Mental Health Service Utilisation: A Population-Based Linkage of Over 17 Years of Health Administrative Records

The complementarity of two major Australian primary mental health care initiatives

Patterns of health service use for children with mental disorders in an Australian state population cohort

Medicare-reimbursed psychiatric consultations before and after telehealth expansion in Australia: a time series study

Acute Inpatient Care for Psychiatric Disorders in the United States, 1996 Through 2007

High utilisers of emergency departments: the profile and journey of patients with mental health issues

Evaluating outcomes following adolescent and youth mental health inpatient admissions: A systematic review

Hospital and out‐of‐hospital services provided by public geriatric medicine departments in Australia and New Zealand

The epidemiology of mental and substance use disorders in Australia 2020-22: Prevalence, socio-demographic correlates, severity, impairment and changes over time

What is the impact of successive COVID-19 lockdowns on population mental health? Findings from an Australian natural experiment using health service data

Frequency and quality of mental health treatment for affective and anxiety disorders among Australian adults

Comparative Financial Implications of Outpatient and Inpatient Service of the Psychiatric Department in General Hospital during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan: Case Report

Paediatric mental and physical health presentations to emergency departments, Victoria, 2008–15

Mental health–related service and medicine use among a cohort of urban Aboriginal children and young people: Data linkage study

Mental health and use of Medicare Benefits Schedule follow-up mental health services by Indigenous people in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic

Access to inpatient mood management services after stroke in Australian acute and rehabilitation hospitals

A New Approach for Understanding International Hospital Bed Numbers and Application to Local Area Bed Demand and Capacity Planning

Characterising the nature of psychiatric disorders and patterns of antipsychotic medications prescribed in a psychiatric ward in a public hospital in Tasmania

Antipsychotic management in general practice: serial cross-sectional study (2011-2020)