Abstract:Objective:To investigate the clinical effect and demonstrate the techniques of single position laparoscopic nephroureterectomy.Methods:The clinical data of 84 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients admitted to the Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from September 2018 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 39 males and 45 females, with a median age of (64.9±9.3)years and mean BMI of(24.7±3.4)kg/m 2. The tumor was located on the left side in 47 cases and the right side in 37 cases. All 84 patients received single position laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into two groups, including 67 cases undergoing nephrectomy first, and then bladder cuff excision was performed along ureter(traditional group), 17 cases undergoing bladder cuff excision before clamping the ureter below the tumor, and then nephrectomy was performed along the ureter to the head side (modified group). There was no statistically significant in the comparison of age [(65.5±9.4)years vs.(62.7±8.9)years], BMI[(24.9±3.5)kg/m 2vs.(23.9±3.3)kg/m 2], left/right side tumor of(38/29 cases vs. 9/8 cases), tumor location (in renal pelvis or calyx or upper/middle/lower ureter being 46/9/12 cases vs. 13/2/2 cases)and tumor stage(T 1-2/T 3-4: 54/13 cases vs. 15/2 cases) between traditional group and modified group ( P>0.05). The operation time, estimate blood loss, postoperative intestinal function recovery time and postoperative drainage time were recorded and compared. Results:All 84 cases were successfully completed without conversion to open surgery. The mean operation time was (160.4±50.1)min, the mean estimated blood loss was(59.4±24.4)ml, the median postoperative intestinal function recovery time was 1(1, 2)d and the mean postoperative drainage time was (4.8±1.9)d(No drainage tube was placed in 4 patients). No Clavien Dindo >grade 3 complications occured. There was no significant difference in the comparison of operation time [(159.2±52.9)min vs. (164.7±38.1)min], estimate blood loss [(60.5±26.2)ml vs. (55.0±17.5)ml], postoperative intestinal function recovery time [1(1-2)d vs. 2(1-2)d] and drainage removal time [(4.8±1.8)d vs. (5.2±2.0)d] between traditional group and modified group ( P>0.05). The postoperative pathology of 84 cases was urothelial carcinoma, and the pathological results of the resection margin were negative. The median follow-up of 84 upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients was 13(3, 28)months. Five patients were lost to follow-up. In traditional group, 5 patients had bladder tumor recurrence, and 5 patients had distant metastasis. In modified group, no bladder tumor recurrence occurred and 1 patient had distant metastasis. Conclusions:Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in single position is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Treatment of the bladder cuff excision firstly is more in line with the principle of tumor-free and increase surgical space.

Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity-Score Matched Studies

Comparison of post-operative intravesical recurrence and oncological outcomes after open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic and open nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision in patients with T3T4 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective study

A Retrospective Single-Center Comparative Study Between Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma on Perioperative Results, Overall Survival, and Recurrence Rate

Comparing Oncological Outcomes and Surgical Complications of Hand-Assisted, Laparoscopic and Robotic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Clinical Value of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Combine with Lower Abdominal Glison Incision For Urinary Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma——Compare with Open Surgery

Single-docking Robotic-Assisted Nephroureterectomy and Extravesical Bladder Cuff Excision Without Intraoperative Repositioning: the Technique and Oncological Outcomes

Clinical Effects and Surgical Techniques of Single Position Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy

Laparoscopic Vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China

RetroperitoneaL Laparoscopic radicaL nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothe‐LiaL carcinoma

Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy and Open Nephrectomy for Radical Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Comparison of Clinical Outcomes

Endoscopic intervention versus radical nephroureterectomy for the management of localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

[Comparison of efficacy and safety between two different methods of nephroureterectomy in two centers].

Surgical Techniques and Oncological Outcomes of Pure Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Comparison of two operations for the treatment of radical nephroureterectomy

Complete Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma and Comparative Outcomes

Comparison between completely and traditionally retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial cancer

Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in 607 Patients with Bladder Cancer: Comparative Survival Analysis

Bilateral Nephroureterectomy Versus Unilateral Nephroureterectomy for Treating De Novo Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Renal Transplantation: A Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes