Abstract:BACKGROUND: Although successful on many fronts, solid organ transplantation fails patients who die on waitlists. Too few organ donors beget this failure. Dispelling misperceptions associated with donation and transplantation would expectedly increase donation and decrease waitlist mortality; recipients would also receive transplants earlier in their disease process, leading to better post-transplantation outcomes.STUDY DESIGN: Survey responses to 7 questions pertaining to organ donation and transplantation were analyzed to determine their association with willingness to donate. Subgroup analyses according to race, residence status (rural vs nonrural), and education level were performed.RESULTS: There were 766 respondents; 84.6% were willing to be a donor, 76.2% were female, 79.7% were Caucasian, and 16.5% were African-American. Having concerns about getting inadequate medical care if registered as a donor was the strongest independent predictor of willingness to donate overall (odds ratio 0.21; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.36) and in each subgroup; African Americans were more likely than Caucasians to have this concern (20.2% vs 9.5%; p < 0.001). Race (odds ratio 0.41; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.75 for African Americans) and age were also predictive overall, but less so. Willingness to donate a family member's organs depended on whether a discussion about donation had hypothetically occurred: 61.0% would donate if there had been no discussion; 95.2% would donate if the family member had said "yes" to donation; and 11.0% would donate if the family member had said "no" (p < 0.001). If there was no prior discussion, having concerns about getting less-aggressive medical care predicted willingness to donate a family member's organs (odds ratio 0.40; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.65).CONCLUSIONS: The strongest deterrent of willingness to donate one's own or a family member's organs is a misperception that should be correctable. Race and age are less predictive. Efforts to dispel misperceptions and increase donation remain desperately needed to improve waitlist mortality and post-transplantation outcomes.

Opt-out Scheme is Still Best Way to Increase Organ Donation, Says BMA.

"Muddy Waters" Surround Evidence for Opt-out System of Organ Donation, Says Surgeon.

UK Aims to Increase Its Organ Donor Rate by 50% over Next Eight Years

Why did England change its law on deceased organ donation in 2019? The dynamic interplay between evidence and values

Opt-out defaults do not increase organ donation rates

Trends in organ donation in England, Scotland and Wales in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and 'opt-out' legislation

Welsh opt-out law fails to increase organ donations.

Potential donor family behaviours, experiences and decisions following implementation of the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019 in England: A qualitative study

Applying utilitarianism to the presumed consent system for organ donation to consider the moral pros and cons

Stimulus for organ donation: a survey of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons membership

Does implementing opt-out solve the organ shortage problem? Evidence from a synthetic control approach

Organ Donor Management: Part 1. Toward a Consensus to Guide Anesthesia Services During Donation After Brain Death

Deterrents to Organ Donation: A Multivariate Analysis of 766 Survey Respondents

Introducing Incentives and Reducing Disincentives in Enhancing Deceased Organ Donation and Transplantation

Solid Organ Donation and Transplantation in the United Kingdom: Good Governance is Key to Success

Premortem interventions in dying children to optimise organ donation: an ethical analysis

Health Matters: Human Organ Donations, Sales, and the Black Market

Current Status of Organ Donation

Rethinking Priority for Prodonation Behaviors in Organ Allocation—Lessons From the Israeli Experience

The right to know from the opt-out effectiveness system perspective in organ transplantation cases

Blood and organ donation: health impact, prevalence, correlates, and interventions