Editorial for Third Issue of 2009, Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine

Mike Clarke,Youping Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-5391.2009.01039.x
2009-01-01
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Abstract:We have passed the half way point of 2009, and are now approaching the first anniversary of the creation of the Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. In this issue, we add to the international nature of the journal with articles from Australia, England, Norway, and the USA; as well as China. We also expand into areas beyond health care. Ning Rui describes four decades of research comparing the outcomes for students who are taught in groups that have been formed on the basis of their ability, with those who were kept in more general, mixed ability groups. While, Haluk Soydan discusses the challenges of generating evidence based knowledge, and translating this into practice in health and social care. The substantial review by Ning Rui on education in general is accompanied by a report from three universities in Australia on an educational approach to improving the safety and quality of health care. You can also read more about the use of results based financing as a means of improving health care and health. Andy Oxman and Atle Fretheim follow up on their review of systematic reviews of this intervention in the previous issue of the Journal, with a critical appraisal of evaluations of results based financing schemes in low and middle-income countries. This reinforces their earlier conclusions that these schemes should be designed carefully, evaluated using rigorous study designs, and must be part of an appropriate package of interventions, with sufficient technical capacity or support available. The need for care in the design of randomised trials is also highlighted in the work of Robert Hills and colleagues. They show how some types of random allocation can make it easier for the researchers to predict the allocation for the next patient, which could undermine the integrity of some trials if adequate concealment is not used. In the previous issue, the Journal's education section discussed the systematic review, in plain language. This time it is the turn of meta-analyses, the statistical component of many systematic reviews, which is used to combine the results of the included studies. There are hundreds of meta-analyses in the 90 new Cochrane reviews that have been published in Issue 3, 2009 of The Cochrane Library. That new issue is discussed here, and you can also listen to free podcasts for several of the new and updated Cochrane reviews at http://www.cochrane.org/podcasts. We also present summaries of two recent Cochrane reviews in which the authors describe, in their own words, research into reducing road traffic crashes and injuries through different ways to discourage the use of alcohol by drivers. Finally, we continue with our focus on health care after the Wenchuan earthquake in May 2008, and on its consequences. This includes an article from Zhu Chen in the Chinese Ministry of Health, about lessons that can be learned from the response to that natural disaster.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?