Clinical Application of Keyhole Techniques in Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery

Lan Qing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00029330-200608020-00002
2006-01-01
Abstract:With the development of modern neuroimaging and the improvement of surgical instruments or devices as well as operative skills, minimally invasive neurosurgery has been progressing rapidly with great changes in surgical concepts and methods.1 Based on these changes, anatomic research has been carried out to explore new surgical approaches dealing with anticipated microtrauma. These approaches have made or been making things possible. Keyhole microsurgery has evolved into an important subject of modern minimally invasive neurosurgery. At the Department of Neurosurgery, Johannes- Gutenberg University in Mainz, Germany, keyhole microsurgery has been routinely performed for brain neoplasms, cerebrovascular diseases, and spinal lesions.2,3 Since we introduced keyhole techniques at our institution 5 years ago, more than 700 patients with aneurysms, vascular. malformations and intracranial hematomas have received keyhole microsurgery in China.4-6 At the 6th International Congress on Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery held in Japan in 2005, many Japanese reports focused on keyhole microsurgery. Prof. Samii concluded that a small bone window 2 cm in diameter with the inner plate removed for nearly 1 cm is sufficient for almost all skullbase operations in the hands of experienced neurosurgeons, which can be defined as a standard surgical procedure. KEYHOLE NEUROMICROSURGERY Keyhole neuromicrosurgery can be performed with neuroendoscopy, neuronavigation and other new beneficial techniques to obtain optimal therapeutic effect with minimal iatrogenic trauma (psychological or physical trauma). This tenet is considered feasible on the basis of deliberately designed surgical approaches according to the anatomic characteristics of individual lesion as well as full utilization of limited manipulating space, diminishment of unnecessary exposure and disruption of normal anatomy, and most importantly consummate microsurgical skills of experienced surgeons. Therefore, keyhole neuromicrosurgery should comprise in-depth understanding of individual lesions and their anatomy, adequate evidence from neuroimaging and other examinations, deliberated designs of approaches, proper and effective perioperative management, advanced surgical instruments and devices, excellent microsurgical skills and sound clinical experience. Early in 1971 Wilson put forward the concept of keyhole approaches which were believed to satisfy the requirements of neuromicrosurgery; but keyhole operations were not clinically practicable until 20 years after related techniques and devices had been developed. With modified conventional craniotomy, Fukushima in 1991 successfully treated aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery via an interhemispheric keyhole approach through a 3 cm-bone window.7 In 1999, Axel Perneczky published a monograph about keyhole neurosurgery,8 indicating the maturation of keyhole techniques. The so-called "keyhole" is a special concept not concentrating on anatomic definition but microtrauma in every step of operation. Usually keyhole neuromicrosurgery is designed to treat various intracranial lesions under a microscope through a small bone window with a diameter of around 2 cm. The advantages of this operation include better cosmetic results and quick rehabilitation; minimal brain exposure and iatrogenic traumatization, which decrease the risk of postoperative complications such as epilepsy, infection, hemorrhage, etc; direct approaches shortening the duration of open and closure procedures and helping surgeons to focus their attention on manipulation of intracranial lesions; less worry about operation and more confidence in healing; and early physical recovery, short hospital stay and less nursing burden. INDIVIDUALIZED DESIGN OF KEYHOLE APPROACHES During keyhole operation, keyhole craniotomy should be as small as possible but sufficient for effective surgery with the operative results as good as or even better than those of normal craniotomies. By small keyhole craniotomy, intracranial lesions especially those in deep locations can be reached according to the so-called "keyhole effect". A small keyhole bone window of about 2 cm in diameter is sufficient to meet surgical requirements for most deep lesions because within the window three instruments can be used simultaneously. Thus hemostasis can be controlled while removing a giant tumor piecemeal. The success of keyhole operation is based on preoperative design and intraoperative localization. Most intracranial lesions have fixed anatomic positions or landmarks such as intracranial aneurysms, sellar tumors, lesions at the cerebellopontine angle, intraventricular masses, etc. Under these circumstances, it is easy to choose one suitable keyhole approach, since these lesions can be located intraoperatively by associated landmarks. Sometimes, preoperative 3D-CT reconstruction locating the intracranial lesions on the scalp is recommended to improve the precision of keyhole operation. If possible, neuronavigation or stereotactic devices are much more convenient for precise orientation.9 Furthermore, a nice neuroendoscope can be assistant to many facilities intraoperatively although it is not indispensable to every keyhole operation. The neuroendoscope is only needed in case of observation of blind areas away from straight microscope light or lesions. In this way, the retraction of brain tissue and the injury of normal structures can be decreased or even avoided. There are various approaches to lesions in the same location. As to tumor in the third ventricle, for instance, interhemispheric transcallosal, infraten- torial-supracerebellar, supraorbital eyebrow or pterional keyhole approaches can be selected individually, so that the ventricle can be entered superiorly, posteriorly, anteriorly or laterally to remove the tumor. Sellar tumors also have many choices including supraorbital keyhole, transorbital- supraorbital keyhole, glabellar keyhole, pterional keyhole, subtemporal keyhole, anterior interhemispheric transcallosal keyhole and interhemispheric transcallosal transforaminal keyhole approaches. Preoperative imaging is helpful to decide the optimal approach by which the operation can be performed conveniently, avoiding injury to vital structures. The manipulating space should also be taken into account to evaluate the feasibility and advantages of the proposed approach. Normally, four anatomic spaces are utilized to treat sellar neoplasms. If necessary, the fifth space posterior to the anterior cerebral artery (A1)-internal carotid artery bifurcation-middle cerebral artery (M1) can also be used. It is worthwhile to point out that in the past the use of the fifth space was not so emphasized when judging one surgical approach, then the posterior portions of sellar tumors were often invisible intraoperatively. Freshmen who just start to perform keyhole operation should not overemphasize the small size of bone window. Instead, they should concentrate on minimal injury during the operation, which is also in accord with the rationale of keyhole neuro- microsurgery. The size of bone window can be decreased gradually. Normally large skin incision plus small craniotomy can be tried first, and if necessary the bone window can be expanded with a milling cutter for a routine operation. For the large lesion at the surface of the brain, the bone window should be made accordingly for an operation when the lesion is exposed. To severe patients with cerebral hypertension before the operation, early craniotomy plus decompressive craniectomy is recommended. PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT Conventionally, the area for sterilization is within a range of 15 cm × 15 cm around the incision. Neurosurgeons are accustomed to shave the whole hair of the patient preoperatively to prevent potential infection. It is also recognized that shaving hair in a large area can reduce the infection rate definitely. In keyhole operation, the length of an incision is about 4 cm, and shaving hair is no longer necessary. Only the hair in an area of 1 cm around the incision needs to be shaved, and this area including the hair nearby is sterilized with iodophor and subsequently covered with small gauze and plastic membrane. Unlike the hair, eyebrows are not shaved if an eyebrow keyhole approach is applied. It is also suggested that hair shaving around the incision is avoid, instead it is combed apart from the incision line and fixed before draping. Evidences have shown that cranial surgery without hair shaving is impossible to increase the risk of infection.10-12 The major procedures of keyhole microsurgery are performed to decrease intracranial pressure (ICP) and expand intracranial space for manipulation. Opening brain cisterns is the most effective way to drain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In patients with high ICP, if drugs like mannitol and fursemide are not effective, additional puncturing of brain ventricle is advisable to release CSF. In case of intracranial huge mass, local cisterns are often oppressed and even disappear, indicating difficulty in intraoperative CSF drainage. As an alternative strategy, a lumbar catheter preoperatively placed for intraoperative drainage of CSF is helpful to reduce ICP. At the completion of intracranial procedure, a watertight dural closure is made with interrupted or continuous sutures. To prevent CSF leakage, DuraGuard can be used to repair dural defect, and subsequently reinforced with medical glue. Small gelatin sponge is packed extradurally for hemostasis, and the dura is unnecessary to be hung up around the margin of craniotomy. A small bone flap is repositioned without epidural or subdural drainage. CLINICAL APPLICATION OF NEUROSURGICAL KEYHOLE OPERATION No contraindications are available for ruptured aneurysm.4,13 Operation is feasible if no marked vasospasm is demonstrated by preoperative cerebral angiography. Keyhole operation can be carried out at any stage of ruptured aneurysm, if decompressive craniectomy is not required. So far, over 100 aneurysms including more than 10 giant ones have been clipped successfully via the keyhole approach at our department. Most of these aneurysms are ruptured and were treated by emergency operation. Through the keyhole approach, the anterior clinoid process can be removed smoothly and giant aneurysms can be resected safely. Up to 5 clips have been used in one operation for clipping one giant aneurysm and for the subsequent angioplasty of the parent artery. With keyhole microsurgical techniques, Perneczky et al8 have clipped 400 aneurysms, 50% of which were treated within 3 days after rupture. Postoperative Doppler ultrasonography detected vasospasm in 24% of the patients, of whom 12% suffered from symptomatic spasm and less than 3% died. With the development of keyhole microsurgery, the expanded skull base approach has been miniaturized.6,14,15 Either subdural or epidural approaches have been used with keyhole concept. The petrous apex, the anterior clinoid process and the internal auditory canal wall can be drilled away routinely via the keyhole approach. If necessary, two keyhole approaches can be used to remove giant neoplasm in the skullbase in a one-stage operation or in other stages. The key of keyhole skull base surgery is to make a bone window directly toward the skull base. For instance, the skin incision of a supraorbital keyhole approach is hidden in eyebrow, with a bone window extending to the superciliary arch. In a normal subtemporal approach, the temporal muscle is retracted toward the base of the temporal bone. Thus the operative field is limited by the zygomatic arch. In the subtemporal keyhole approach, however, the temporal muscle is dissected and retracted bilaterally. With this approach, it is easy to reach the skull base without removal of the zygomatic arch. Hypertensive hematoma can be removed with satisfied hemostasis by keyhole operation, thus increasing the rehabilitation opportunities of paralysis and aphasia in patients, and effectively preventing the occurrence of brain hernia. Therefore it is necessary to reevaluate the operative indications for hypertensive hematoma. Surgery should be performed before severe conscious disturbance or brain hernia appears. Intracranial vascular malformations, especially those smaller than 1.5 cm, can also be removed via keyhole approaches. Intraoperative localization depends on the bleeding or calcified portions of vascular malformations or, more conveniently and precisely, neuronavigation guided with skillfully reconstructed and fused images like MRI plus MRA, CT plus CTA, or 3D-DSA.9 For the large malformations, the surgical incisions should be made according to the suggested area 2 cm wider than the discerned border of the lesions, since the real lesion usually bigger than that discerned on imaging. And bone window is suggested to be 1 cm bigger than the discerned border. Keyhole approaches are feasible in the treatment of traumatic intracranial hematomas when decompressive craniectomy is unnecessary. With the aid of a neuroendoscope, epidural hematoma caused by non-depressed skull fracture can be removed totally with sufficient hemostasis. Furthermore, absorbable hemostatic material like Surgicel is packed around the edges of the hematoma. Only localized cerebral or subdural hematoma with mild cerebral contusion is recommended to be treated via keyhole approaches to prevent postoperative hemorrhage caused by limited exposure and insufficient hemostasis under small bone window. Keyhole concepts have also been introduced in operations on the vertebral canal and spinal cord. After hemilaminectomy, intervertebral disc or tumor laterally located in the spinal canals is removed. If needed, small bony extension inferior to the spinous process can be drilled away to expose the whole posterior aspect of the spinal cord. This approach is suitable for intramedullary lesions or giant subdural neoplasms, with maximal preservation of bony structure integrity and obviously reduced risk of spinal column instability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?