Abstract:INTRODUCTION Microneurosurgery made its debut in the early 1960s. It became popular in the medical field and became a primary operation method in neurosurgery since it improved the efficacy of neurosurgery with a less surgery-related injury. Over the past five decades, the accumulation of experience of microsurgery, improvement of microsurgery techniques, refined micro-instruments, and advanced preoperative diagnostic imaging allowed the evolution of microneurosurgery techniques and further reduced surgery-related trauma. The advanced development has made it possible for a neurosurgeon to treat more sophisticated lesions with smaller craniotomy. Keyhole neurosurgery, the combination of modern microsurgical techniques, preoperative imaging, neuroendoscopy, and modern minimally invasive surgery concept, is one of the techniques representing the medical advancement from microneurosurgery to minimally invasive neurosurgery. The concept of keyhole microsurgery was introduced in 1971 by Wilson, who advocated using microsurgical techniques to refine conventional microsurgery approach. However, the concept did not accept until 20 years later, for the small anatomic window he advocated was just for saving operation time rather than authentic keyhole concept in contemporary neurosurgery: operating with a minimum of trauma while achieving maximal surgical efficiency. In 1991, Fukushima et al. first reported their surgery on anterior communicating aneurysm clipping through the interhemispheric keyhole approach with a 3 cm-diameter craniotomy.[1] In 1999, Perneczky's monograph on keyhole microsurgery[2] was published, which marked the maturity of this technique. Keyhole neurosurgery is a new minimally invasive microsurgery based on precise microneurosurgical techniques. With anatomic and pathological structures and “keyhole effect”, this method is precisely designed to minimize anatomic window for an ideal exposure of lesions that reduces unnecessary intracranial structural exposure or destruction. The “keyhole” is small but crucial, with keyhole bone window as its figurative summary. Choosing the right size and location of the craniotomy is based on the operation needs in accordance with the principle of “large enough for treating the lesion while minimizes approach-related trauma.” With current techniques, bone windows within 3 cm in diameter are sufficient for the operation of microsurgery for most of the deep lesions. In general, a 4-cm incision and a cranial bone window about 2.5 cm in diameter are used in the surgery. The minimal exposure and minimal invasive operation of the keyhole microsurgery have clear benefits for patients, including less intraoperative injury, less postoperative infection risk, less surgery-related complication, shorter hospitalization time, less cost of treatment, and optimal cosmetic outcome, which improves patient's acceptance of the surgery. In addition, surgeons can spend more time and pay more attention to the treatment of lesions, thus improving the operation quality; it can reduce the workload of nurses as well. To standardize and promote the keyhole microsurgery in neurosurgery, the Chinese Neurosurgical Society has organized relevant experts and scholars to compile “Consensus on the Application of Keyhole Microneurosurgery in China” from November 2015, and the final draft was approved in December 2016. This is intended to improve neurosurgeons’ knowledge of keyhole microsurgery technology, to standardize the operations, and thus to promote the enormous development of minimally invasive neurosurgery in China. The levels of recommendations for keyhole approaches are classified as following standards: Level I – evidence obtained from meta-analysis or systematic review of randomized controlled trials; Level II – evidence obtained from at least one randomized controlled trial; Level III – evidence obtained from well-designed control studies, case–control studies, and cohort studies; Level IV – evidence obtained from multiple time series designs with or without the intervention; Level V – opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees. PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION OF KEYHOLE MICROSURGERY Keyhole microsurgery is based on advanced development of microsurgical techniques, which requires surgeons to have adept operation skills and rich clinical experience. Sophisticatedly designed surgical instruments are also needed. Accurate preoperative planning for keyhole microsurgery approach Meticulous preoperative planning is crucial to a successful keyhole microsurgery. Every step, from skin incision to cranium closing, should be taken into consideration. Patient's lesions and anatomic structure are important basis for selecting an appropriate keyhole approach. If the surgery is complicated, alternative approaches should be considered for unplanned events. The dissection practice for the application of keyhole microsurgery approach can improve surgeon's adaptation of microsurgery instruments, familiarity of the intracranial anatomy, and exposure zone in different keyhole approaches, and improve the confidence of the surgeons in keyhole microsurgery. Therefore, it can be used as a basic training before the clinical application. Surgical instruments Microscope A high-quality surgical microscope is essential for a successful keyhole microsurgery. As the bone window is narrow, it is necessary to constantly adjust the microscope angle to change the projection area to make efficient illumination. As a result, a surgical microscope with electromagnetic lock adjustment function can better satisfy the requirements. Refined microsurgery instruments A gun-type rod-shaped instrument can effectively increase the visual space in the operation, so as to avoid the microscope field from being shadowed by the fingers of the surgeons or the instrument itself. For a more successful keyhole microsurgery, rod-shaped or narrow-wing micro-scissors, dissectors, or aneurysm clip holder should be used when possible. Among them, the cutting-head tip of the micro-scissors will be slightly curved. Many of the existing tumor removal equipment, such as ultrasound aspirator, radio frequency (RF) knife, and laser knife, all have rod-shaped or pointy head handle, are convenient for the resection of tumor through the keyhole approach. Power system In the operation, a 3-mm diameter hole is created in the skull, and a bone window with 2.0–2.5 cm diameter is formed by taking out the bone flap. After the surgery, the small bone flap is placed back to its original position and fixed. If necessary, the inner plate of the bone window edge can be grinded out to expand the field of vision. A micro-grinding drill measured to be 8–10 cm long and 0.3 cm in distal diameter is more suitable for the removal of the anterior and posterior clinoid processes, opening the back of the internal auditory canal and other deep bone removal operations through the keyhole approach. Automatic retractor As the keyhole microsurgery has small operational space, and almost only one surgeon is performing the surgery, an automatic retractor is also one of the necessary surgical instruments as it does not affect the field of view, and it can fix the exposure zone under the surgical field of vision without the help of an assistant. Retractors fixed by bedside support arm work best, so the flexible retractor is easy to adjust and control, and retractors that fix to the skull should be avoided. Neuroendoscope The development and improvement of a neuroendoscope provides favorable conditions to the keyhole microsurgery, which can improve the poor field of vision during operation.[34567] Neuroendoscope with a diameter of 2–4 mm can provide a bright, detailed image of deep lesions, and the near to the lesion, the better and clearer the image magnification will be. Angular endoscope can also show blind spots which are difficult to be identified by the microscope, reducing the traction and injury to normal tissues, and improving the surgical outcome. Head holder A head holder can provide a suitable head position to reduce intraoperative traction of brain tissue. Operating bed An electrically powered operating bed is very useful for adjusting the head and body positions of the patient for observations at different directions under the microscope during operation, and it also helps the surgeons to maintain a comfortable body posture. Other instruments Other instruments such as two brain spatulas, two aspirator tubes, bipolar forceps, or clip holder can be simultaneously used during the operation through keyhole approach. If necessary, a neuroendoscope can be used for observation and operation. Preparation and sterilization of the operation area The skin incision in keyhole surgery is generally about 4 cm, so hair is not necessary for shaving off before operation. The shaving area may be 1 cm around the incision or comb the hair to two sides and make an incision in the hairline. To prepare for the operation, first wash and clean the hair, and use iodophor to clean the surgical area, followed by routine sterilization. A sterile drape may be applied to the operation area to isolate the surrounding hair. Mark the incision line with a sterile marker for identification. COMMON KEYHOLE MICROSURGERY APPROACHES Supraorbital keyhole approach This approach is recommended at Level III[891011] and IV[1213]. Head position Lay the patient in a supine position. Use Mayfield head holder to fix the patient's head. Rotate the head about 10°–60° to the contralateral side depending on the site and size of the lesion. If ipsilateral mesial temporal lobe region and the middle cerebral artery M1 and M2 segments need to be exposed, rotate the head only about 10°–20°; for the suprasellar and rear sella lesions, rotate the head about 20°–40°; for the anterior skull base midline lesions such as olfactory sulcus meningioma, rotate the head about 40°–60°. Lean the head back for about 10°–15°, so that the frontal lobe goes backward because of gravity and leaves the anterior skull base to reduce intraoperative traction; slightly bending the head sideward about 5°–15° to the contralateral side is helpful for the contralateral approach surgery, and it also offers the surgeon a more comfortable operation direction. Incision Make an eyebrow incision which starts internally from the outer edge of the supraorbital foramen and ends externally at the outer edge of the eyebrow. Pay attention to protect the supraorbital nerve, and there is no need to shave eyebrows. Use plaster application to close eyelid fissure. Use iodophor to clean the eyebrows by the operation area and sterilize it in routine manner. Then, use sterile gauze to cover the eyebrows and surrounding area, followed by fixation of surgical drape and coverage with the surgical towels in the routine manner. Incise the skin, retract with an eyelid retractor, and separate the subcutaneous and frontal fascia with monopolar electrotome. Cut the temporalis fascia along the superior temporal line for 2 cm. The frontal periosteum is incised in a semicircle shape from the superior temporal line, and then stripped and flipped. The base is located in the superior orbital rim. Bluntly separate the temporalis muscle, push it to 1.0–1.5 cm behind the superior temporal line, and fix the tissue with suture to expose the operation area. Craniotomy Mill out a bone hole about 3 mm in diameter behind the frontal bone zygomatic process (keyhole position). The bone hole should be posterior to the temporal line, and the location should not be too low to avoid milling through the orbital wall. Use the milling cutter along the hole's orbital roof toward the back to take a bone flap about 2.0 cm × 2.5 cm, and try to avoid opening the frontal sinus. If the frontal sinus is opened, it should be tightly repaired. It can be sealed with gelatin sponge or bone wax or reinforced with glue if needed. Grind out the inner plate of supraorbital bone window edge to gain greater visual space. Some bone ridge protrusion in the anterior skull base can be removed through the space outside dura mater. Cut off a piece of flap-shaped dura under the microscope and with the base at the orbital rim. Use a brain spatula to lightly lift up the frontal lobe base to constantly absorb cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), so as to decrease the brain pressure; further explore the skull base to expose and open chiasmatic cistern, carotid artery cistern to further release CSF, resulting in the collapse of the brain tissue which will incline and leave the skull base under the action of its own gravity, which provides an effective operative space. Cranium closure Dura should be tightly sutured and drainage tube is not needed. Use skull lock or connector to fix the bone flap. Suture periosteum and myofascial layer by layer, use of metal cosmetic suture with continuous intradermal stitches, can greatly reduce surgical scars. Exposure zones The supraorbital keyhole approach effectively exposes the frontal lobe base, anterior clinoid process, canalis opticus, olfactory sulcus, olfactory tract, optic nerve, optic chiasm, oculomotor nerve, anterior communicating artery, anterior cerebral artery A1 segment, pituitary stalk, diaphragma sellae, dorsum sellae, posterior clinoid process, basilar artery apex, posterior cerebral artery P1 segment, superior cerebellar artery proximal, front upper pontine and interpeduncular cistern, anteromedial temporal lobe, internal carotid, middle cerebral artery (M1, M2 segment, and part of M3 segment), anterior choroidal artery, posterior communicating artery; and contralateral carotid artery medial surface, anterior cerebral artery A1 and A2 proximal, middle cerebral artery M1 and M2 proximal. Pterional keyhole approach This approach is recommended at Level III[14] and IV.[1516] Head position Slightly lean the patient's head back, so that the frontal lobe inclines and leaves the orbital roof by gravity; rotate the head about 30°–60° to the contralateral side based on actual need: a greater rotation angle to the contralateral side is needed when the lesion is closer to the frontal end. Slightly bend the head about 15° to the contralateral side, to compensate for the upward inclination angle along the middle skull base. Craniotomy About 2 cm outside the keyhole, around the pterion, make an anterior hairline incision about 4–5 cm long. Incise the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and temporal fascia, separate the flap, and retract it with a hook. Incise the temporal muscle along the direction of the muscle fibers through pterion and expand it with the mastoid expander after separation. An osseous depression can be seen in the exposed central skull bone, which is the mark of the sphenoid ridge on the surface of the skull. Drill a bone hole about 3 mm in diameter on the bottom of the sphenoid ridge, and from this location, mill out a bone flap about 2.5 cm in diameter, and remove 1/2–2/3 of the lateral sphenoid ridge, if necessary, the edge can reach the lateral side of the supraorbital fissure. Centering on the sphenoid ridge, cut open the dura flap and retract it forward to expose the Sylvian fissure. Usually, the frontal and temporal lobes are exposed 1:1, and this ratio may be adjusted according to surgery needs by moving up or down of the incision location, thus the location of the burr hole and the exposure area of the frontal and temporal lobes. For treating anterior communicating artery aneurysms, the Sylvian fissure are usually located at the lateral 1/3 of the bone window, 2/3 of the brain tissue exposed under the bone window is the frontal lobe, and the other 1/3 is the temporal lobe. The Sylvian fissure can be opened to reduce the tension between the frontal and the temporal lobe. For treating middle cerebral artery aneurysms or lateral posterior communicating artery aneurysms, the Sylvian fissure is usually placed in the center of the bone window, so that the temporal lobe can be slightly retracted after opening of the Sylvian fissure to fully expose field of surgery. Cranium closure It is basically as same as that of supraorbital keyhole approach described above. The hairline incision can be sutured in the routine manner. Exposure zones Pterional keyhole approach has the similar exposure to the blood vessels and neural structure as the standard pterional approach. It exposes (1) anterior circulation artery: ipsilateral posterior communicating artery, anterior choroidal artery, internal carotid artery, ophthalmic artery, middle cerebral artery M1 to M4 segment, anterior cerebral artery A1 and A2 proximal; contralateral cerebral anterior artery A1 and A2 proximal, middle cerebral artery M1 and M2 proximal, internal carotid artery's interior and bifurcation; (2) posterior circulation artery: basilar artery apex, superior cerebellar artery proximal, posterior cerebral artery P1 and P2a segment; (3) anterior cranial fossa, suprasellar region, parasellar, retrosella, cavernous sinus superior wall, front part of cavernous sinus lateral wall, sphenoid ridge, frontal pole, temporal pole, front end of middle cranial fossa, interpeduncular cistern, prepontine cistern, etc. Subtemporal keyhole approach This approach is recommended at Level IV.[17] Head position Lie the patient in the supine position with shoulder elevated, and rotate the patient's head about 90° to the contralateral side of the lesion, and keep the zygomatic arch in the horizontal position; lean the head back about 15°, so as not to oppress the trachea; laterally bend the head 15° to the contralateral position, to compensate for the upward incline angle along the middle skull base. This head position allows the temporal lobe to incline and leave the skull base by gravity so the intraoperative tension is reduced. Craniotomy The skin incision is made in the front of and about 1 cm away from tragus. Starting from the superior zygomatic arch, make a vertical incision approximately 4 cm above the zygomatic arch. Incise the skin to separate the subcutaneous tissue, make sure to avoid damage to the frontal branch of facial nerve and superficial temporal artery. Make a Y-shaped temporalis fascia incision, and retract it to expose the surgical field. Longitudinally incise the temporal muscle and retract it to both sides to expose the temporal bone squama. Drill a hole posterosuperior to the zygomatic arch base, and create a bone window about 2.0–2.5 cm in diameter with the milling cutter. Incise the dura in flap shape, and flip it to the inferotemporal. Gently lift up the temporal base, to gradually release CSF to reduce the intracranial pressure. Then, gradually go deeper to expose the edge of the tentorial incisura. Cranium closure It is basically as same as that of the supraorbital keyhole approach mentioned above. Exposure zones Lift up the bottom of the temporal to expose the lower part of the middle brain, the lateral upper part of the pons, posterior cerebral artery P2 segment and its branches, oculomotor nerve. The tentorium posterior incisura region can expose the supratentorial part of the trochlear nerve. Incise the free edge of the tentorium in the rear part of trochlear nerve and suspend it to expose the superior cerebellar artery, trochlear nerve, anterosuperior cerebellar, the lower part of the pons. Retract the margin of tentorium cerebelli between the oculomotor nerve and trochlear nerve, to expose the top of basilar artery, ipsilateral and contralateral posterior cerebral artery P1 segment. And, it can expose ipsilateral tractus opticus, internal carotid artery, posterior communicating artery, anterior choroidal artery, thalamus arteriae perforantes, posterior cerebral artery, and pituitary stalk. Median suboccipital keyhole approach This approach is recommended at Level IV.[18] Head position Lie the patient in a prone position, and bend the head forward to fully extend the craniocervical junction. Craniotomy Make an upward suboccipital median incision that is 1 cm below the foramen magnum and approximately 4 cm long. Incise the scalp and sharply separate it along the midline, expand it with mastoid expander to expose occipital skull. Create a bone window about 2.5 cm in diameter from the trailing edges of foramen magnum, in the upward direction. Incise the dura in X shape and close the occipital sinus with cautery or suture. Open the cisterna magna, lift up the cerebellar tonsil, separate arachnoid adhesions, and expose the forth ventricle through the cerebellomedullary fissure approach. Cranium closure It is basically the same as that of supraorbital keyhole approach described above. Tightly suture the dura, and repair it if necessary. Exposure zones The suboccipital middle keyhole approach can expose the cerebellar tonsil and inferior vermis, posterior inferior cerebellar artery, the fourth ventricle, pons and medullary dorsal parts. Retrosigmoid keyhole approach This approach is recommended at Level IV.[181920] Head position The patient is laid in lateral prone posture. Rotate the patient's head about 10°–20° to the contralateral side from the lateral position, to provide a direct view angle with less retraction to the cerebellar hemisphere, and can successfully open cerebellopontine angle cistern. During the operation, based on the location of the lesion, the view angle can be adjusted by adjusting the degree of inclination (left and right) of the operating bed. Craniotomy Starting at the junction line of the external occipital protuberance and mastoid roots, about 1.5–2.0 cm posterior to the mastoid roots, make a vertical, downward incision about 4 cm long. Incise the scalp and muscles and expand them with the mastoid expander, then create a burr hole about 2.5 cm in diameter behind the mastoid. The top of the bone window is near the horizontal inferior margin of the transverse sinus, and its lateral edge is on the posterior edge of the sigmoid sinus. Close the mastoid air cells with bone wax if they are opened. Incise the dura mater in flap shape with its base locates at the sigmoid sinus. Retract the lower lateral cerebellum to the internal side and gradually open the cerebellum medulla lateral cistern to release CSF and to reduce intracranial pressure. Dissect cerebellopontine angle cistern and lateral cerebellar medulla cistern to expose anatomical structures. Cranium closure It is basically the same as that of supraorbital keyhole approach described above. Tightly suture the dura mater, and repair it if necessary. Exposure zones Via retrosigmoid keyhole approach, the following anatomic structures can be exposed: trigeminal nerve, facial nerve, acoustic nerve, posterior cranial nerve, lateral and anterior lateral pons, lateral cerebellar hemisphere, vertebral artery, posterior inferior cerebellar artery. For treating lesions at the posterior cranial nerve, the surgical incision and bone window position may go down accordingly. Interhemispheric transcallosal keyhole approach This approach is recommended at Level IV.[21] Head position The patient is laid in the semi-sitting position with the head in the median position, forming a 45° angle with the horizontal line. After the bone flap is opened, tilt the head to the surgical side, so that the hemisphere inclines and leaves the midline, reducing the intraoperative traction. Craniotomy One centimeter beside the midline, make a linear incision about 4 cm long. The specific incision points are determined by the location of the lesion. Drill a cranial hole about 3 mm in diameter beside the midline, and mill out a small bone flap about 2 cm in diameter to expose the sagittal sinus edge besides the midline. Incise the dura mater in flap shape, and flip it to the side of the midline. Carefully separates the arachnoid membrane near the sagittal sinus, without causing any damage to the large draining veins. If necessary, free up a section of the vein by separating the arachnoid on its surface and to increase the degree of displacement. Use a brain spatula to retract the lateral cerebral hemisphere, gradually go deeper, and incise the callosum longitudinally for about 2 cm to reach the lateral ventricle. Cranium closure It is basically the same as that of supraorbital keyhole approach mentioned above. Exposure zones Through interhemispheric transcallosal keyhole approach, the following anatomic structures can be exposed: the distal segment of the anterior cerebral artery, body of the lateral ventricle, third ventricle, thalamus, etc. KEYHOLE MICROSURGERY TECHNIQUES Effective intracranial operating space Limited exposure and narrow space make it hard to operate in a microsurgery. Inappropriate brain traction will lead to more severe damage to the brain. Releasing the CSF can make larger effective intracranial operating space for keyhole surgery. An important step in keyhole surgery is to reduce the intraoperative intracranial pressure to increase the intracranial operating space. The most effective way is to open the brain cistern to release CSF, and the brain tissue will retract on its own. For patients with high intracranial pressure, if the dehydrating agent fails to work effectively, the ventricle needs to be punctured to release CSF. For some lesions that largely occupy the intracranial space, the local brain cistern has been compressed and disappeared, so it may be difficult to release CSF during operation. To solve this problem, lumbar puncture the subarachnoid and place the shunt before the operation for intraoperative releasing of the CSF, thus reducing the intracranial pressure. Some scholars conduct conventional lumbar shunt before operation. When keyhole surgery is performed in the skull base, it is critical to confine the surgical bone window to the skull base. For example, in the supraorbital keyhole approach, the incision is hidden in the eyebrows, and the bone window reaches the superciliary arch; in the subtemporal keyhole approach, the temporalis is separated and distracted to both sides to avoid the retraction of temporal muscle flap towards the temporal base in the conventional approach, and to prevent the surgical field from being blocked by the zygomatic arch. The keyhole approach gets rid of useless structural damages and tissue exposures to retain the effective operation space to satisfy the actual needs. Bleeding control during aneurysm operation The steps of aneurysm clipping in keyhole surgery are the same as these of conventional microsurgeries, even for treating ruptured aneurysms the technique would be the same. The surgeon with rich experience in correctly dealing with accidental bleeding during various surgeries under the surgical microscope can use the same methods to treat unexpected bleeding during keyhole surgery (Level II recommendation,[22] Level III recommendation,[23242526] and Level IV recommendation[2728]). In keyhole surgeries, effective control of the parent artery is the key to the success of aneurysm surgery, and the dissection of parent artery and aneurysm neck is particularly important. In the keyhole approach, various parts can be dissected and exposed in order, and the aneurysm neck can be dissected after effective control of the parent artery. However, rupture of aneurysm before effective control of the parent artery is still possible. When it bleeds furiously, two aspirators can be used in the surgery: the one with a larger suction head is used to aspirator the blood at the ruptured aneurysm, and the one with a smaller suction head is used to aspirator the blood in the surgical field. When the surgical field is clear, rapidly dissect and temporarily occlude the parent artery, or directly dissect the aneurysm neck and then clips it if possible. Use of cotton pads to inappropriately compress the ruptured aneurysm should be avoided as it will result in accumulative intracranial hemorrhage and cause acute brain swelling. If necessary, the aneurysm can be clipped preliminarily, and its position can be adjusted after bleeding is under control. Surgical strategy for large tumors During keyhole surgery, due to the keyhole's amplification effect, intracranial field widens with increasing distance from the approach entrance, an ideal field of view of the deep structure can be obtained. The deeper the intracranial location, the larger field of view can be obtained through a small bone window by adjusting the angle of the microscope. This large field of view helps the surgeon operates much easily. Furthermore, all parts within the field of view can be observed in details by adjusting the angle of the microscope. For deep brain tumors over 3 cm in diameter, there are numerous complicated nerves and vascular structures surround the lesion so that which is removed piece by piece in conventional approaches. Therefore, a bone window about 2 cm in diameter can meet the basic requirements of such surgeries without extending time of tumor removal. The cavity created after the tumor removal provides a gradually increasing surgical space, and it also allows the surrounding tumor tissues to gradually drift to the central field of view after intra-tumor decompression, leading to the complete removal of tumors (Level IV recommendation[429]). Use of RF knife, laser knife, and ultrasonic suction device are beneficial for the removal of large tumors and can greatly shorten the operation time. In the subtemporal keyhole approach, after the removal of petrous bone, lesions at the posterior fossa can be treated through the incision at the tentorium; in the retrosigmoid keyhole approach, residual tumors inside the auditory canal can be resected by removing the posterior wall of the internal auditory canal. In the supraobital or pterional keyhole approaches, cavernous sinus tumor can be dissected by removing the anterior clinoid process or cut open the cavernous sinus along the oculomotor nerve. Combining a variety of keyhole approaches is a good way to treat huge tumors spanning the anterior and middle cranial fossa, or those spanning middle and posterior cranial fossa, avoiding the complex operation of a single approach (Level IV recommendation[3031]). Keyhole surgery for the treatment of huge tumors can be individually designed according to the specific situation. Precise locating of the lesion As the keyhole approach can reach the lesion only from one direction and the surgical approach may not be changed during operation, the precise preoperative locating of the lesion is the key to the success of the keyhole surgery. Most of the lesions are at certain intracranial anatomical locations, such as aneurysms at various parts, sella tumors, cerebello-pontine angle lesions, intraventricular lesions, and pineal region tumors. For these lesions, no additional locating is needed for the selection of an effective keyhole approach. The neuronavigation system provides assistant to the design of individualized keyhole approach, especially for the precise positioning of small lesions in the brain parenchyma. It can also help surgeons know the progress when removing large tumors, so as to reduce unnecessary intracranial exploration. The appropriate treatment of surgical incision Although the skin incision within eyebrows is relatively small in the supraorbital keyhole approach, compared to the hairline incision, it is still exposed and not suitable for patients with light eyebrows; and when subcutaneous tissue or the skin from the opposite sites of the incision fails to match well, it will easily cause defects in the appearance of the eyebrow. Coagulation should be minimized during cutting and separation to prevent postoperative tissue shrinkage. When closing up the incision, the layers should be carefully matched and should be sutured subcutaneously with noninvasive metal sutures. If necessary, tape can be used to further pull together and close the skin incision. Change dressings after surgery in a timely manner to prevent incision from errhysis and incrustation which delay healing. Because the eyebrows have loose subcutaneous tissue, it is prone to subcutaneous hydrops. If it happens, pressure bandage or puncture drainage should be used. When the keyhole surgery is performed at the skull base, the different keyhole approaches may open the frontal sinus, mastoid air cells, petrous bone air cells, anterior clinoid process air cells, and corresponding repair at the skull base is required to prevent postoperative CSF leakage. Suggestions for less-experienced surgeons Surgeons who are new to the keyhole surgery should not blindly pursue for a minimized bone window, but rather focus on understanding the concept of minimum invasion in the keyhole surgery and to have a bone window as small as possible based on their experience. Initially, a larger bone window can be made, and smaller ones can be made as the surgeons become more and more experienced. Alternatively, the surgeons can have a large incision with a small bone window. If needed, the bone window can be quickly expanded by the milling cutter and change to conventional craniotomy approach. Furthermore, surgeons can be trained in anatomic dissection to familiarize themselves with the keyhole surgery and the indications for different approaches. This is also an effective way to improve the confidence of the surgeons, and to ensure the surgery is performed safely. In general, keyhole approach can meet the basic requirements of most neurosurgeries and can be further applied as a minimally invasive technique. It is based on the extensive experience in microsurgery, and surgeons needed to be trained in microdissection and then adapt and improve these skills. However, small craniotomies also have some restrictions. The limitations are as follows: In the keyhole approach, the space for operation is limited, and the operational orientation is essentially fixed, so it is difficult to change the orientation of surgical approach; in most cases of intraoperative aneurysm bleeding, because of the limited space for the assistant to operate, the surgeon himself will need to control bleeding and clipping of the aneurysm, which requires detailed preoperative planning. If it is expected that a multi-angle approach is needed for the surgery, craniotomy with a large bone flap is more appropriate. Patients with severe subarachnoid hemorrhage or serious disturbance of consciousness may suffer from postoperative cerebral vasospasm or intracranial hypertension, so they should be treated with craniotomy with large bone flap at the early stage, if necessary, receive decompressive craniectomy. For large tumors close to the surface of the cortex or arteriovenous malformations, the whole lesion needs to be exposed, and craniotomy with a large bone flap is a more appropriate approach. For surgeries that are known to have a difficult to relieve postoperative high intracranial pressure, craniotomy with a large bone flap is more beneficial. The advanced development of science and technology also contributes to the development and improvement of keyhole microsurgeries. For example, in recent years, the hybrid surgical platforms[32] and simulated operation through three-dimensional printed solid brain model[33] became available, and provide strong support for the development of keyhole microsurgeries. Accurate preoperative planning and adequate dealing with intracranial lesions are the precondition for success and safety of keyhole surgery. Due to the limited space, details are not presented here. Related publications can be read before preparation if necessary. In conclusion, the keyhole approach can meet the basic requirements of most neurosurgeries and can be further applied as a minimally invasive technique. However, keyhole microsurgery is based on the extensive experience in microsurgery, and the surgeons needed to be trained in microdissection and then adapt and improve these skills. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Abstract:The skull base communicating tumor is characterized by simultaneous invasion of the intracranial and extracranial structures. The tumor may originate from the intracranial structures and invade extracranially, or vice versa. The total resection of the tumor is difficult, and a lot of complications may occur after the operation.1 From September 1998 to September 2002, 21 patients with skull base communicating tumors were treated in our hospital by endoscope-assisted microneurosurgery combined with diode laser through different operative approaches. CLINICAL DATA Manifestations Of the 21 cases, 12 were men and 9 were women, with a mean age of (39.8±10.7) years (9 to 68 years) and a mean course of the disease of (21.4±18.6) months (2 weeks to 5 years). The patients presented with headache and dizziness in 6 (28.6%), facial numbness in 3 (14.3%), exophthalmus in 6 (28.6%), ophthalmoplegia and diplopia in 5 (23.8%), visual regression in 5 (23.8%), rhinostegnosis in 6 (28.6%), somatasthenia in 1 (4.8%), temporal mass in 2 (9.5%), occipitocervical mass in 1 (4.8%), acoustic regression in 2 (9.5%), and multiple yellow papula in 1 (4.8%). Radiological features CT and MRI showed that the communicating tumors located at the anterior skull base in 10 patients, middle skull base in 6, posterior skull base in 2, and anterior-middle skull base in 3. Three-dimensional CT was performed in 7 patients to identify the tumor territory and the relationship between the tumor and the vessels. Nine tumors with abundant blood supply were evaluated by the digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and the ipsilateral external carotid arteries were embolized in 3 cases. Surgical treatment and prognosis All the patients underwent microsurgical operation through different operative approaches according to the nature and extent of the tumors (Table). During the operation, variously angled neuroendoscopes (ASCULP, Gemany) were used to observe the tumor and neurovascular structures in the region out of the microscopic field (Leica, Gemany). The diode laser (DioMED60, England) was utilized to liberate, vaporize and resect the tumor. The extracranial part of the tumor was removed before resecting the intracranial part. To the best of our abilities, vascular and malignant tumors were resected en bloc, and other benign tumors were removed bit by bit to reduce the injury of the normal structures (esp. brain tissue). Skull base was reconstructed after the tumor removal.Table: Pathology and extent of skull base communicating tumor and operative approachEach of the patients with squamous carcinoma at the anterior skull base, and osteochondroma, racemosum hemangioma, and meningioma at the middle skull base received subtotal resection; and each of the patients with esthesioneuroblastoma at the anterior skull base and osteosarcoma at the middle skull base underwent partial resection; the tumor of the other cases were totally resected. No operative mortality and severe complication occurred. The 6 patients received subtotal or partial resection resection and one patient with a totally resected squamous carcinoma were treated with radiotherapy or γ-knife after the operation. The patients were followed up for 2 to 5 years (mean 3.4±0.8). One of them who had an osteosarcoma at the middle skull base died, and two patients with a partially resected esthesioneuroblastoma or a subtotally resected squamous carcinoma had recurrence (Fig.).Fig.: Contrast enhanced MRI of a facial neurilemmoma. A: Before the operation, the tumor located at the middle cranial fossa. B: Before the operation, the tumor invaded into the petrous bone and subtemporal fossa.DISCUSSION The skull base communicating tumors invade several anatomical regions close to the neurovascular structures. The removal of these tumors is difficult and postoperative complications are frequent. The diagnosis of the tumor and the choice of operative approach and method depend on the results of CT, 3D-CT, MRI, and DSA. According to the location, size, property, and adjacent structures of the communicating tumors, the option of operative approach is varied.2 Our 21 cases were treated by transfrontal, pterion, transsphenoid, transoral, median suboccipital, paralateronasal, preauricular subtemporal, combined craniofacial approaches, respectively, and achieved satisfactory results. The paralateronasal, preauricular subtemporal and combined craniofacial approaches are rational when the extent and property of the tumor are uncertain. The incision can be extended along the upper orbital rim to the frontal region according to the extent of tumor when the paralateronasal approach is used.3 This approach is suitable for the communicating tumors at the anterior skull base, because the traction of the brain tissue is slight when the affected intraorbital tissues, ethmoid plate, and dura mater were resected, but the tumor invading the middle cranial fossa cannot be totally removed by the approach. Preauricular subtemporal approach4 can expose not only the middle and anterior skull base, but also the deep frontal and temporal structures and lesions by mildly tracting the frontal and temporal lobes. The approach prefer to the tumor in the cavernous sinus, petrous apex, upper and middle clivus, infratemporal fossa, pterygopalatine fossa, and nasopharyngeal region. It often results in satisfactory outcomes in patients with communicating tumors at the middle skull base (esp. epidural tumor) and mildly injured brain tissue. Combined craniofacial approach5 is helpful to determine the extent of the tumor and thoroughly remove the tumor invading the anterior and middle cranial fossa en bloc. By using the approach, the malignant tumor can be removed, and the important neurovascular structures (e.g. the brain tissues, cranial nerve, internal carotid artery, and cavernous sinus) can be protected, the skull base can be reconstructed, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage can be prevented. However, with this approach, the brain tissue is often pulled obviously, resulting in severe cerebral edema after the operation. The skull base communicating tumors have abundant blood supply and are always supplied by the external and internal carotid arteries simultaneously. Therefore, preoperative handling of the vessels supplying the tumor is crucial to reduce intraoperative bleeding. To the tumors with extensive invasion and abundant blood supply, endovascular embolization and the ligation of the external or common carotid artery should be done before the operation. Because the skull base communicating tumor has an extensive invasion (esp. the vascular and malignant tumors), it is hard to expose and remove it en bloc under a microscope, the residual tumor and injuries of the neurovascular structures caused by operation often affect the prognosis. Endoscope-assisted microneurosurgery can not only protect the important vessels and nerves at the skull base, but also reduce the incidence of other important structures injury,6 and thus can totally remove the tumor that was impossible to resect in the past. In this study, based on our knowledge on endoscopic microanatomy, variously angled endoscopes were used to observe the areas out of the microscopic field to avoid blind manipulation, especially for the resection of the intracranial part of the tumor. The angled endoscopes are able to uncover the important nerves and vessels (such as internal carotid artery, optic nerve etc.), improve the possibility of en bloc resection of vascular or malignant tumors, reduce the traction of the brain tissue and the unnecessary exposure during the operation. After the removal of the tumor, the endoscope was utilized to explore the areas behind the neurovascular structures and the traction of the nerves and vessels was not necessary when the residual tumor was vaporized and removed by diode laser.7 The diode laser can reduce the incidence of residue and recurrent of the tumor. Because the narrow endoscopic caliber limits the visual field and the variability of location after entering the cranium, the best operative approach should be adopted in terms of the position of the tumor. The diode laser can greatly increase the temperature of the irradiated tissues, resulting in protein denaturation, coagulation and necrosis, and even charing and vaporization. The laser is effective on the dissection, hemostasis, and vaporization of the tumor at the skull base, especially for those which had abundant blood supply and is hard to be excised, or located at the important regions (e.g. the vicinity of brainstem) that cannot be pulled. Diode laser can reduce bleeding and keep clear visual field, eliminate traction and shorten operative time.8 Low power laser (1−5 W) is useful to coagulate and shrink the tumor capsule and coagulate the blood vessels in the surface, while high power laser (5−10 W) can be used in intracystic excision. The power should be adjusted according to the blood supply, and property and location of the tumor. The high power laser is suitable for the tumor with abundant blood supply, but not for the tumor in the regions near the important structures. Thus elevating the power of laser within a safe extent can improve the velocity of dissection and shorten operative time. In addition, the effect of sterilization of the diode laser can provide a good sterile environment for operation, reduce the secondary infection, which is important for a skull base communicating tumor. In this study, all the patients except one survived without severe complications after the microsurgery with a high rate of total resection. The dural defect after resection of the communicating tumor at the skull base followed by intracranial infection may result in cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Therefore, the skull base reconstruction is very important. To prevent postoperative complications, dura mater must be repaired closely in skull base reconstruction. The free or pedicle graft should be put outside to strengthen the dura mater, and the skull base bone defect should be repaired if necessary.9 In all of our patients, the skull base was reconstructed, the dura mater was repaired by pericranium, temporal aponeurosis, and temporal muscle flap, and the bone was restored using titanium plate or self-bone if the diameter of the defect was over 3 cm. The extracranial tumor cavity was filled by temporal muscle or fat. No complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage and intracranial infection occurred in our patients.

Application of Keyhole Microneurosurgery in China.

Treatment of Intracranial Lesions by Microsurgery Through Keyhole Approach in 73 Patients

Treatment of Skull Base Communicating Tumor with Endoscope-Assisted Microneurosurgery and Diode Laser

Clinical application of transcranial neuroendoscopy combined with supraorbital keyhole approach in minimally invasive surgery of the anterior skull base

Minimally invasive keyhole craniotomies for microsurgical clipping of cerebral aneurysms: comparative meta-analysis of the mini-pterional and supraorbital keyhole approaches

Effect of microscopic keyhole surgery on neurological function and prognosis of patients with intracranial small meningioma

Keyhole approach to surgical removal of supratentorial lesions: Clinical analysis of 71 cases

Endoscopically Assisted Targeted Keyhole Retrosigmoid Approaches for Microvascular Decompression: Quantitative Anatomic Study

Keyhole surgery for acoustic neuroma

Intradural Subtemporal Keyhole Approach with Neuronavigational Assistance to the Petroclival and Ventrolateral Brainstem Regions: Quantitative Analysis of Anatomic Exposure and Surgical Freedom.

Keyhole Approach for Removal of Ventricular Tumors

Keyhole Alternatives to Pterional Craniotomy for the Microsurgical Clipping of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms: Technical Pearls, Surgical Results, and a Case Selection Algorithm

Endoscopic Intradural Subtemporal Keyhole Approach with Neuronavigational Assistance to the Suprasellar, Petroclival, and Ventrolateral Brainstem Regions: an Anatomic Study.

A Miniaturized Ultrasonic Micro-hole Perforator for Minimally Invasive Craniotomy

Microneurosurgical Skills Training

Minimally invasive endoscopic-assisted approaches to the posterior fossa

Endoscope-assisted Keyhole surgery for cerebral aneurysms

The application of intraoperative ultrasound with burr hole probe in minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment in neurosurgery

Endoscopic Anatomical Study of the Glabellar Keyhole Approach

Features of endoscopic anatomy of the chiasmal-sellar region in transcranial endoscopy via supraorbital keyhole-access

Feasibility of robotic posterior fossa skull base surgery