Application of Keyhole Microneurosurgery in China.
Li-Gang Chen,Shu-Da Chen,Guang-Fu Huang,Ying Huang,De-Zhi Kang,Qing Lan,Gang Li,Xin-Gang Li,Zhi-Xiong Liu,Song-Tao Qi,Xin-Hua Tian,Guo-Liang Wang,Shuo Wang,Xiang-Yu Wang,Yong-Fei Wang,Yun-Jie Wang,Chao You,Yan-Bing Yu,Shu-Yuan Yue,Dong Zhang,Jian-Min Zhang,Jian-Ning Zhang,Jun-Ting Zhang,Shi-Zhong Zhang,Xian Zhang,Ya-Zhuo Zhang,Ji-Zong Zhao,Wei-Guo Zhao,Yuan-Li Zhao,Ding-Biao Zhou,Liang-Fu Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.211884
IF: 6.133
2017-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:INTRODUCTION Microneurosurgery made its debut in the early 1960s. It became popular in the medical field and became a primary operation method in neurosurgery since it improved the efficacy of neurosurgery with a less surgery-related injury. Over the past five decades, the accumulation of experience of microsurgery, improvement of microsurgery techniques, refined micro-instruments, and advanced preoperative diagnostic imaging allowed the evolution of microneurosurgery techniques and further reduced surgery-related trauma. The advanced development has made it possible for a neurosurgeon to treat more sophisticated lesions with smaller craniotomy. Keyhole neurosurgery, the combination of modern microsurgical techniques, preoperative imaging, neuroendoscopy, and modern minimally invasive surgery concept, is one of the techniques representing the medical advancement from microneurosurgery to minimally invasive neurosurgery. The concept of keyhole microsurgery was introduced in 1971 by Wilson, who advocated using microsurgical techniques to refine conventional microsurgery approach. However, the concept did not accept until 20 years later, for the small anatomic window he advocated was just for saving operation time rather than authentic keyhole concept in contemporary neurosurgery: operating with a minimum of trauma while achieving maximal surgical efficiency. In 1991, Fukushima et al. first reported their surgery on anterior communicating aneurysm clipping through the interhemispheric keyhole approach with a 3 cm-diameter craniotomy.[1] In 1999, Perneczky's monograph on keyhole microsurgery[2] was published, which marked the maturity of this technique. Keyhole neurosurgery is a new minimally invasive microsurgery based on precise microneurosurgical techniques. With anatomic and pathological structures and “keyhole effect”, this method is precisely designed to minimize anatomic window for an ideal exposure of lesions that reduces unnecessary intracranial structural exposure or destruction. The “keyhole” is small but crucial, with keyhole bone window as its figurative summary. Choosing the right size and location of the craniotomy is based on the operation needs in accordance with the principle of “large enough for treating the lesion while minimizes approach-related trauma.” With current techniques, bone windows within 3 cm in diameter are sufficient for the operation of microsurgery for most of the deep lesions. In general, a 4-cm incision and a cranial bone window about 2.5 cm in diameter are used in the surgery. The minimal exposure and minimal invasive operation of the keyhole microsurgery have clear benefits for patients, including less intraoperative injury, less postoperative infection risk, less surgery-related complication, shorter hospitalization time, less cost of treatment, and optimal cosmetic outcome, which improves patient's acceptance of the surgery. In addition, surgeons can spend more time and pay more attention to the treatment of lesions, thus improving the operation quality; it can reduce the workload of nurses as well. To standardize and promote the keyhole microsurgery in neurosurgery, the Chinese Neurosurgical Society has organized relevant experts and scholars to compile “Consensus on the Application of Keyhole Microneurosurgery in China” from November 2015, and the final draft was approved in December 2016. This is intended to improve neurosurgeons’ knowledge of keyhole microsurgery technology, to standardize the operations, and thus to promote the enormous development of minimally invasive neurosurgery in China. The levels of recommendations for keyhole approaches are classified as following standards: Level I – evidence obtained from meta-analysis or systematic review of randomized controlled trials; Level II – evidence obtained from at least one randomized controlled trial; Level III – evidence obtained from well-designed control studies, case–control studies, and cohort studies; Level IV – evidence obtained from multiple time series designs with or without the intervention; Level V – opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees. PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION OF KEYHOLE MICROSURGERY Keyhole microsurgery is based on advanced development of microsurgical techniques, which requires surgeons to have adept operation skills and rich clinical experience. Sophisticatedly designed surgical instruments are also needed. Accurate preoperative planning for keyhole microsurgery approach Meticulous preoperative planning is crucial to a successful keyhole microsurgery. Every step, from skin incision to cranium closing, should be taken into consideration. Patient's lesions and anatomic structure are important basis for selecting an appropriate keyhole approach. If the surgery is complicated, alternative approaches should be considered for unplanned events. The dissection practice for the application of keyhole microsurgery approach can improve surgeon's adaptation of microsurgery instruments, familiarity of the intracranial anatomy, and exposure zone in different keyhole approaches, and improve the confidence of the surgeons in keyhole microsurgery. Therefore, it can be used as a basic training before the clinical application. Surgical instruments Microscope A high-quality surgical microscope is essential for a successful keyhole microsurgery. As the bone window is narrow, it is necessary to constantly adjust the microscope angle to change the projection area to make efficient illumination. As a result, a surgical microscope with electromagnetic lock adjustment function can better satisfy the requirements. Refined microsurgery instruments A gun-type rod-shaped instrument can effectively increase the visual space in the operation, so as to avoid the microscope field from being shadowed by the fingers of the surgeons or the instrument itself. For a more successful keyhole microsurgery, rod-shaped or narrow-wing micro-scissors, dissectors, or aneurysm clip holder should be used when possible. Among them, the cutting-head tip of the micro-scissors will be slightly curved. Many of the existing tumor removal equipment, such as ultrasound aspirator, radio frequency (RF) knife, and laser knife, all have rod-shaped or pointy head handle, are convenient for the resection of tumor through the keyhole approach. Power system In the operation, a 3-mm diameter hole is created in the skull, and a bone window with 2.0–2.5 cm diameter is formed by taking out the bone flap. After the surgery, the small bone flap is placed back to its original position and fixed. If necessary, the inner plate of the bone window edge can be grinded out to expand the field of vision. A micro-grinding drill measured to be 8–10 cm long and 0.3 cm in distal diameter is more suitable for the removal of the anterior and posterior clinoid processes, opening the back of the internal auditory canal and other deep bone removal operations through the keyhole approach. Automatic retractor As the keyhole microsurgery has small operational space, and almost only one surgeon is performing the surgery, an automatic retractor is also one of the necessary surgical instruments as it does not affect the field of view, and it can fix the exposure zone under the surgical field of vision without the help of an assistant. Retractors fixed by bedside support arm work best, so the flexible retractor is easy to adjust and control, and retractors that fix to the skull should be avoided. Neuroendoscope The development and improvement of a neuroendoscope provides favorable conditions to the keyhole microsurgery, which can improve the poor field of vision during operation.[34567] Neuroendoscope with a diameter of 2–4 mm can provide a bright, detailed image of deep lesions, and the near to the lesion, the better and clearer the image magnification will be. Angular endoscope can also show blind spots which are difficult to be identified by the microscope, reducing the traction and injury to normal tissues, and improving the surgical outcome. Head holder A head holder can provide a suitable head position to reduce intraoperative traction of brain tissue. Operating bed An electrically powered operating bed is very useful for adjusting the head and body positions of the patient for observations at different directions under the microscope during operation, and it also helps the surgeons to maintain a comfortable body posture. Other instruments Other instruments such as two brain spatulas, two aspirator tubes, bipolar forceps, or clip holder can be simultaneously used during the operation through keyhole approach. If necessary, a neuroendoscope can be used for observation and operation. Preparation and sterilization of the operation area The skin incision in keyhole surgery is generally about 4 cm, so hair is not necessary for shaving off before operation. The shaving area may be 1 cm around the incision or comb the hair to two sides and make an incision in the hairline. To prepare for the operation, first wash and clean the hair, and use iodophor to clean the surgical area, followed by routine sterilization. A sterile drape may be applied to the operation area to isolate the surrounding hair. Mark the incision line with a sterile marker for identification. COMMON KEYHOLE MICROSURGERY APPROACHES Supraorbital keyhole approach This approach is recommended at Level III[891011] and IV[1213]. Head position Lay the patient in a supine position. Use Mayfield head holder to fix the patient's head. Rotate the head about 10°–60° to the contralateral side depending on the site and size of the lesion. If ipsilateral mesial temporal lobe region and the middle cerebral artery M1 and M2 segments need to be exposed, rotate the head only about 10°–20°; for the suprasellar and rear sella lesions, rotate the head about 20°–40°; for the anterior skull base midline lesions such as olfactory sulcus meningioma, rotate the head about 40°–60°. Lean the head back for about 10°–15°, so that the frontal lobe goes backward because of gravity and leaves the anterior skull base to reduce intraoperative traction; slightly bending the head sideward about 5°–15° to the contralateral side is helpful for the contralateral approach surgery, and it also offers the surgeon a more comfortable operation direction. Incision Make an eyebrow incision which starts internally from the outer edge of the supraorbital foramen and ends externally at the outer edge of the eyebrow. Pay attention to protect the supraorbital nerve, and there is no need to shave eyebrows. Use plaster application to close eyelid fissure. Use iodophor to clean the eyebrows by the operation area and sterilize it in routine manner. Then, use sterile gauze to cover the eyebrows and surrounding area, followed by fixation of surgical drape and coverage with the surgical towels in the routine manner. Incise the skin, retract with an eyelid retractor, and separate the subcutaneous and frontal fascia with monopolar electrotome. Cut the temporalis fascia along the superior temporal line for 2 cm. The frontal periosteum is incised in a semicircle shape from the superior temporal line, and then stripped and flipped. The base is located in the superior orbital rim. Bluntly separate the temporalis muscle, push it to 1.0–1.5 cm behind the superior temporal line, and fix the tissue with suture to expose the operation area. Craniotomy Mill out a bone hole about 3 mm in diameter behind the frontal bone zygomatic process (keyhole position). The bone hole should be posterior to the temporal line, and the location should not be too low to avoid milling through the orbital wall. Use the milling cutter along the hole's orbital roof toward the back to take a bone flap about 2.0 cm × 2.5 cm, and try to avoid opening the frontal sinus. If the frontal sinus is opened, it should be tightly repaired. It can be sealed with gelatin sponge or bone wax or reinforced with glue if needed. Grind out the inner plate of supraorbital bone window edge to gain greater visual space. Some bone ridge protrusion in the anterior skull base can be removed through the space outside dura mater. Cut off a piece of flap-shaped dura under the microscope and with the base at the orbital rim. Use a brain spatula to lightly lift up the frontal lobe base to constantly absorb cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), so as to decrease the brain pressure; further explore the skull base to expose and open chiasmatic cistern, carotid artery cistern to further release CSF, resulting in the collapse of the brain tissue which will incline and leave the skull base under the action of its own gravity, which provides an effective operative space. Cranium closure Dura should be tightly sutured and drainage tube is not needed. Use skull lock or connector to fix the bone flap. Suture periosteum and myofascial layer by layer, use of metal cosmetic suture with continuous intradermal stitches, can greatly reduce surgical scars. Exposure zones The supraorbital keyhole approach effectively exposes the frontal lobe base, anterior clinoid process, canalis opticus, olfactory sulcus, olfactory tract, optic nerve, optic chiasm, oculomotor nerve, anterior communicating artery, anterior cerebral artery A1 segment, pituitary stalk, diaphragma sellae, dorsum sellae, posterior clinoid process, basilar artery apex, posterior cerebral artery P1 segment, superior cerebellar artery proximal, front upper pontine and interpeduncular cistern, anteromedial temporal lobe, internal carotid, middle cerebral artery (M1, M2 segment, and part of M3 segment), anterior choroidal artery, posterior communicating artery; and contralateral carotid artery medial surface, anterior cerebral artery A1 and A2 proximal, middle cerebral artery M1 and M2 proximal. Pterional keyhole approach This approach is recommended at Level III[14] and IV.[1516] Head position Slightly lean the patient's head back, so that the frontal lobe inclines and leaves the orbital roof by gravity; rotate the head about 30°–60° to the contralateral side based on actual need: a greater rotation angle to the contralateral side is needed when the lesion is closer to the frontal end. Slightly bend the head about 15° to the contralateral side, to compensate for the upward inclination angle along the middle skull base. Craniotomy About 2 cm outside the keyhole, around the pterion, make an anterior hairline incision about 4–5 cm long. Incise the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and temporal fascia, separate the flap, and retract it with a hook. Incise the temporal muscle along the direction of the muscle fibers through pterion and expand it with the mastoid expander after separation. An osseous depression can be seen in the exposed central skull bone, which is the mark of the sphenoid ridge on the surface of the skull. Drill a bone hole about 3 mm in diameter on the bottom of the sphenoid ridge, and from this location, mill out a bone flap about 2.5 cm in diameter, and remove 1/2–2/3 of the lateral sphenoid ridge, if necessary, the edge can reach the lateral side of the supraorbital fissure. Centering on the sphenoid ridge, cut open the dura flap and retract it forward to expose the Sylvian fissure. Usually, the frontal and temporal lobes are exposed 1:1, and this ratio may be adjusted according to surgery needs by moving up or down of the incision location, thus the location of the burr hole and the exposure area of the frontal and temporal lobes. For treating anterior communicating artery aneurysms, the Sylvian fissure are usually located at the lateral 1/3 of the bone window, 2/3 of the brain tissue exposed under the bone window is the frontal lobe, and the other 1/3 is the temporal lobe. The Sylvian fissure can be opened to reduce the tension between the frontal and the temporal lobe. For treating middle cerebral artery aneurysms or lateral posterior communicating artery aneurysms, the Sylvian fissure is usually placed in the center of the bone window, so that the temporal lobe can be slightly retracted after opening of the Sylvian fissure to fully expose field of surgery. Cranium closure It is basically as same as that of supraorbital keyhole approach described above. The hairline incision can be sutured in the routine manner. Exposure zones Pterional keyhole approach has the similar exposure to the blood vessels and neural structure as the standard pterional approach. It exposes (1) anterior circulation artery: ipsilateral posterior communicating artery, anterior choroidal artery, internal carotid artery, ophthalmic artery, middle cerebral artery M1 to M4 segment, anterior cerebral artery A1 and A2 proximal; contralateral cerebral anterior artery A1 and A2 proximal, middle cerebral artery M1 and M2 proximal, internal carotid artery's interior and bifurcation; (2) posterior circulation artery: basilar artery apex, superior cerebellar artery proximal, posterior cerebral artery P1 and P2a segment; (3) anterior cranial fossa, suprasellar region, parasellar, retrosella, cavernous sinus superior wall, front part of cavernous sinus lateral wall, sphenoid ridge, frontal pole, temporal pole, front end of middle cranial fossa, interpeduncular cistern, prepontine cistern, etc. Subtemporal keyhole approach This approach is recommended at Level IV.[17] Head position Lie the patient in the supine position with shoulder elevated, and rotate the patient's head about 90° to the contralateral side of the lesion, and keep the zygomatic arch in the horizontal position; lean the head back about 15°, so as not to oppress the trachea; laterally bend the head 15° to the contralateral position, to compensate for the upward incline angle along the middle skull base. This head position allows the temporal lobe to incline and leave the skull base by gravity so the intraoperative tension is reduced. Craniotomy The skin incision is made in the front of and about 1 cm away from tragus. Starting from the superior zygomatic arch, make a vertical incision approximately 4 cm above the zygomatic arch. Incise the skin to separate the subcutaneous tissue, make sure to avoid damage to the frontal branch of facial nerve and superficial temporal artery. Make a Y-shaped temporalis fascia incision, and retract it to expose the surgical field. Longitudinally incise the temporal muscle and retract it to both sides to expose the temporal bone squama. Drill a hole posterosuperior to the zygomatic arch base, and create a bone window about 2.0–2.5 cm in diameter with the milling cutter. Incise the dura in flap shape, and flip it to the inferotemporal. Gently lift up the temporal base, to gradually release CSF to reduce the intracranial pressure. Then, gradually go deeper to expose the edge of the tentorial incisura. Cranium closure It is basically as same as that of the supraorbital keyhole approach mentioned above. Exposure zones Lift up the bottom of the temporal to expose the lower part of the middle brain, the lateral upper part of the pons, posterior cerebral artery P2 segment and its branches, oculomotor nerve. The tentorium posterior incisura region can expose the supratentorial part of the trochlear nerve. Incise the free edge of the tentorium in the rear part of trochlear nerve and suspend it to expose the superior cerebellar artery, trochlear nerve, anterosuperior cerebellar, the lower part of the pons. Retract the margin of tentorium cerebelli between the oculomotor nerve and trochlear nerve, to expose the top of basilar artery, ipsilateral and contralateral posterior cerebral artery P1 segment. And, it can expose ipsilateral tractus opticus, internal carotid artery, posterior communicating artery, anterior choroidal artery, thalamus arteriae perforantes, posterior cerebral artery, and pituitary stalk. Median suboccipital keyhole approach This approach is recommended at Level IV.[18] Head position Lie the patient in a prone position, and bend the head forward to fully extend the craniocervical junction. Craniotomy Make an upward suboccipital median incision that is 1 cm below the foramen magnum and approximately 4 cm long. Incise the scalp and sharply separate it along the midline, expand it with mastoid expander to expose occipital skull. Create a bone window about 2.5 cm in diameter from the trailing edges of foramen magnum, in the upward direction. Incise the dura in X shape and close the occipital sinus with cautery or suture. Open the cisterna magna, lift up the cerebellar tonsil, separate arachnoid adhesions, and expose the forth ventricle through the cerebellomedullary fissure approach. Cranium closure It is basically the same as that of supraorbital keyhole approach described above. Tightly suture the dura, and repair it if necessary. Exposure zones The suboccipital middle keyhole approach can expose the cerebellar tonsil and inferior vermis, posterior inferior cerebellar artery, the fourth ventricle, pons and medullary dorsal parts. Retrosigmoid keyhole approach This approach is recommended at Level IV.[181920] Head position The patient is laid in lateral prone posture. Rotate the patient's head about 10°–20° to the contralateral side from the lateral position, to provide a direct view angle with less retraction to the cerebellar hemisphere, and can successfully open cerebellopontine angle cistern. During the operation, based on the location of the lesion, the view angle can be adjusted by adjusting the degree of inclination (left and right) of the operating bed. Craniotomy Starting at the junction line of the external occipital protuberance and mastoid roots, about 1.5–2.0 cm posterior to the mastoid roots, make a vertical, downward incision about 4 cm long. Incise the scalp and muscles and expand them with the mastoid expander, then create a burr hole about 2.5 cm in diameter behind the mastoid. The top of the bone window is near the horizontal inferior margin of the transverse sinus, and its lateral edge is on the posterior edge of the sigmoid sinus. Close the mastoid air cells with bone wax if they are opened. Incise the dura mater in flap shape with its base locates at the sigmoid sinus. Retract the lower lateral cerebellum to the internal side and gradually open the cerebellum medulla lateral cistern to release CSF and to reduce intracranial pressure. Dissect cerebellopontine angle cistern and lateral cerebellar medulla cistern to expose anatomical structures. Cranium closure It is basically the same as that of supraorbital keyhole approach described above. Tightly suture the dura mater, and repair it if necessary. Exposure zones Via retrosigmoid keyhole approach, the following anatomic structures can be exposed: trigeminal nerve, facial nerve, acoustic nerve, posterior cranial nerve, lateral and anterior lateral pons, lateral cerebellar hemisphere, vertebral artery, posterior inferior cerebellar artery. For treating lesions at the posterior cranial nerve, the surgical incision and bone window position may go down accordingly. Interhemispheric transcallosal keyhole approach This approach is recommended at Level IV.[21] Head position The patient is laid in the semi-sitting position with the head in the median position, forming a 45° angle with the horizontal line. After the bone flap is opened, tilt the head to the surgical side, so that the hemisphere inclines and leaves the midline, reducing the intraoperative traction. Craniotomy One centimeter beside the midline, make a linear incision about 4 cm long. The specific incision points are determined by the location of the lesion. Drill a cranial hole about 3 mm in diameter beside the midline, and mill out a small bone flap about 2 cm in diameter to expose the sagittal sinus edge besides the midline. Incise the dura mater in flap shape, and flip it to the side of the midline. Carefully separates the arachnoid membrane near the sagittal sinus, without causing any damage to the large draining veins. If necessary, free up a section of the vein by separating the arachnoid on its surface and to increase the degree of displacement. Use a brain spatula to retract the lateral cerebral hemisphere, gradually go deeper, and incise the callosum longitudinally for about 2 cm to reach the lateral ventricle. Cranium closure It is basically the same as that of supraorbital keyhole approach mentioned above. Exposure zones Through interhemispheric transcallosal keyhole approach, the following anatomic structures can be exposed: the distal segment of the anterior cerebral artery, body of the lateral ventricle, third ventricle, thalamus, etc. KEYHOLE MICROSURGERY TECHNIQUES Effective intracranial operating space Limited exposure and narrow space make it hard to operate in a microsurgery. Inappropriate brain traction will lead to more severe damage to the brain. Releasing the CSF can make larger effective intracranial operating space for keyhole surgery. An important step in keyhole surgery is to reduce the intraoperative intracranial pressure to increase the intracranial operating space. The most effective way is to open the brain cistern to release CSF, and the brain tissue will retract on its own. For patients with high intracranial pressure, if the dehydrating agent fails to work effectively, the ventricle needs to be punctured to release CSF. For some lesions that largely occupy the intracranial space, the local brain cistern has been compressed and disappeared, so it may be difficult to release CSF during operation. To solve this problem, lumbar puncture the subarachnoid and place the shunt before the operation for intraoperative releasing of the CSF, thus reducing the intracranial pressure. Some scholars conduct conventional lumbar shunt before operation. When keyhole surgery is performed in the skull base, it is critical to confine the surgical bone window to the skull base. For example, in the supraorbital keyhole approach, the incision is hidden in the eyebrows, and the bone window reaches the superciliary arch; in the subtemporal keyhole approach, the temporalis is separated and distracted to both sides to avoid the retraction of temporal muscle flap towards the temporal base in the conventional approach, and to prevent the surgical field from being blocked by the zygomatic arch. The keyhole approach gets rid of useless structural damages and tissue exposures to retain the effective operation space to satisfy the actual needs. Bleeding control during aneurysm operation The steps of aneurysm clipping in keyhole surgery are the same as these of conventional microsurgeries, even for treating ruptured aneurysms the technique would be the same. The surgeon with rich experience in correctly dealing with accidental bleeding during various surgeries under the surgical microscope can use the same methods to treat unexpected bleeding during keyhole surgery (Level II recommendation,[22] Level III recommendation,[23242526] and Level IV recommendation[2728]). In keyhole surgeries, effective control of the parent artery is the key to the success of aneurysm surgery, and the dissection of parent artery and aneurysm neck is particularly important. In the keyhole approach, various parts can be dissected and exposed in order, and the aneurysm neck can be dissected after effective control of the parent artery. However, rupture of aneurysm before effective control of the parent artery is still possible. When it bleeds furiously, two aspirators can be used in the surgery: the one with a larger suction head is used to aspirator the blood at the ruptured aneurysm, and the one with a smaller suction head is used to aspirator the blood in the surgical field. When the surgical field is clear, rapidly dissect and temporarily occlude the parent artery, or directly dissect the aneurysm neck and then clips it if possible. Use of cotton pads to inappropriately compress the ruptured aneurysm should be avoided as it will result in accumulative intracranial hemorrhage and cause acute brain swelling. If necessary, the aneurysm can be clipped preliminarily, and its position can be adjusted after bleeding is under control. Surgical strategy for large tumors During keyhole surgery, due to the keyhole's amplification effect, intracranial field widens with increasing distance from the approach entrance, an ideal field of view of the deep structure can be obtained. The deeper the intracranial location, the larger field of view can be obtained through a small bone window by adjusting the angle of the microscope. This large field of view helps the surgeon operates much easily. Furthermore, all parts within the field of view can be observed in details by adjusting the angle of the microscope. For deep brain tumors over 3 cm in diameter, there are numerous complicated nerves and vascular structures surround the lesion so that which is removed piece by piece in conventional approaches. Therefore, a bone window about 2 cm in diameter can meet the basic requirements of such surgeries without extending time of tumor removal. The cavity created after the tumor removal provides a gradually increasing surgical space, and it also allows the surrounding tumor tissues to gradually drift to the central field of view after intra-tumor decompression, leading to the complete removal of tumors (Level IV recommendation[429]). Use of RF knife, laser knife, and ultrasonic suction device are beneficial for the removal of large tumors and can greatly shorten the operation time. In the subtemporal keyhole approach, after the removal of petrous bone, lesions at the posterior fossa can be treated through the incision at the tentorium; in the retrosigmoid keyhole approach, residual tumors inside the auditory canal can be resected by removing the posterior wall of the internal auditory canal. In the supraobital or pterional keyhole approaches, cavernous sinus tumor can be dissected by removing the anterior clinoid process or cut open the cavernous sinus along the oculomotor nerve. Combining a variety of keyhole approaches is a good way to treat huge tumors spanning the anterior and middle cranial fossa, or those spanning middle and posterior cranial fossa, avoiding the complex operation of a single approach (Level IV recommendation[3031]). Keyhole surgery for the treatment of huge tumors can be individually designed according to the specific situation. Precise locating of the lesion As the keyhole approach can reach the lesion only from one direction and the surgical approach may not be changed during operation, the precise preoperative locating of the lesion is the key to the success of the keyhole surgery. Most of the lesions are at certain intracranial anatomical locations, such as aneurysms at various parts, sella tumors, cerebello-pontine angle lesions, intraventricular lesions, and pineal region tumors. For these lesions, no additional locating is needed for the selection of an effective keyhole approach. The neuronavigation system provides assistant to the design of individualized keyhole approach, especially for the precise positioning of small lesions in the brain parenchyma. It can also help surgeons know the progress when removing large tumors, so as to reduce unnecessary intracranial exploration. The appropriate treatment of surgical incision Although the skin incision within eyebrows is relatively small in the supraorbital keyhole approach, compared to the hairline incision, it is still exposed and not suitable for patients with light eyebrows; and when subcutaneous tissue or the skin from the opposite sites of the incision fails to match well, it will easily cause defects in the appearance of the eyebrow. Coagulation should be minimized during cutting and separation to prevent postoperative tissue shrinkage. When closing up the incision, the layers should be carefully matched and should be sutured subcutaneously with noninvasive metal sutures. If necessary, tape can be used to further pull together and close the skin incision. Change dressings after surgery in a timely manner to prevent incision from errhysis and incrustation which delay healing. Because the eyebrows have loose subcutaneous tissue, it is prone to subcutaneous hydrops. If it happens, pressure bandage or puncture drainage should be used. When the keyhole surgery is performed at the skull base, the different keyhole approaches may open the frontal sinus, mastoid air cells, petrous bone air cells, anterior clinoid process air cells, and corresponding repair at the skull base is required to prevent postoperative CSF leakage. Suggestions for less-experienced surgeons Surgeons who are new to the keyhole surgery should not blindly pursue for a minimized bone window, but rather focus on understanding the concept of minimum invasion in the keyhole surgery and to have a bone window as small as possible based on their experience. Initially, a larger bone window can be made, and smaller ones can be made as the surgeons become more and more experienced. Alternatively, the surgeons can have a large incision with a small bone window. If needed, the bone window can be quickly expanded by the milling cutter and change to conventional craniotomy approach. Furthermore, surgeons can be trained in anatomic dissection to familiarize themselves with the keyhole surgery and the indications for different approaches. This is also an effective way to improve the confidence of the surgeons, and to ensure the surgery is performed safely. In general, keyhole approach can meet the basic requirements of most neurosurgeries and can be further applied as a minimally invasive technique. It is based on the extensive experience in microsurgery, and surgeons needed to be trained in microdissection and then adapt and improve these skills. However, small craniotomies also have some restrictions. The limitations are as follows: In the keyhole approach, the space for operation is limited, and the operational orientation is essentially fixed, so it is difficult to change the orientation of surgical approach; in most cases of intraoperative aneurysm bleeding, because of the limited space for the assistant to operate, the surgeon himself will need to control bleeding and clipping of the aneurysm, which requires detailed preoperative planning. If it is expected that a multi-angle approach is needed for the surgery, craniotomy with a large bone flap is more appropriate. Patients with severe subarachnoid hemorrhage or serious disturbance of consciousness may suffer from postoperative cerebral vasospasm or intracranial hypertension, so they should be treated with craniotomy with large bone flap at the early stage, if necessary, receive decompressive craniectomy. For large tumors close to the surface of the cortex or arteriovenous malformations, the whole lesion needs to be exposed, and craniotomy with a large bone flap is a more appropriate approach. For surgeries that are known to have a difficult to relieve postoperative high intracranial pressure, craniotomy with a large bone flap is more beneficial. The advanced development of science and technology also contributes to the development and improvement of keyhole microsurgeries. For example, in recent years, the hybrid surgical platforms[32] and simulated operation through three-dimensional printed solid brain model[33] became available, and provide strong support for the development of keyhole microsurgeries. Accurate preoperative planning and adequate dealing with intracranial lesions are the precondition for success and safety of keyhole surgery. Due to the limited space, details are not presented here. Related publications can be read before preparation if necessary. In conclusion, the keyhole approach can meet the basic requirements of most neurosurgeries and can be further applied as a minimally invasive technique. However, keyhole microsurgery is based on the extensive experience in microsurgery, and the surgeons needed to be trained in microdissection and then adapt and improve these skills. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Clinical Application of Keyhole Techniques in Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery
Lan Qing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00029330-200608020-00002
2006-01-01
Abstract:With the development of modern neuroimaging and the improvement of surgical instruments or devices as well as operative skills, minimally invasive neurosurgery has been progressing rapidly with great changes in surgical concepts and methods.1 Based on these changes, anatomic research has been carried out to explore new surgical approaches dealing with anticipated microtrauma. These approaches have made or been making things possible. Keyhole microsurgery has evolved into an important subject of modern minimally invasive neurosurgery. At the Department of Neurosurgery, Johannes- Gutenberg University in Mainz, Germany, keyhole microsurgery has been routinely performed for brain neoplasms, cerebrovascular diseases, and spinal lesions.2,3 Since we introduced keyhole techniques at our institution 5 years ago, more than 700 patients with aneurysms, vascular. malformations and intracranial hematomas have received keyhole microsurgery in China.4-6 At the 6th International Congress on Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery held in Japan in 2005, many Japanese reports focused on keyhole microsurgery. Prof. Samii concluded that a small bone window 2 cm in diameter with the inner plate removed for nearly 1 cm is sufficient for almost all skullbase operations in the hands of experienced neurosurgeons, which can be defined as a standard surgical procedure. KEYHOLE NEUROMICROSURGERY Keyhole neuromicrosurgery can be performed with neuroendoscopy, neuronavigation and other new beneficial techniques to obtain optimal therapeutic effect with minimal iatrogenic trauma (psychological or physical trauma). This tenet is considered feasible on the basis of deliberately designed surgical approaches according to the anatomic characteristics of individual lesion as well as full utilization of limited manipulating space, diminishment of unnecessary exposure and disruption of normal anatomy, and most importantly consummate microsurgical skills of experienced surgeons. Therefore, keyhole neuromicrosurgery should comprise in-depth understanding of individual lesions and their anatomy, adequate evidence from neuroimaging and other examinations, deliberated designs of approaches, proper and effective perioperative management, advanced surgical instruments and devices, excellent microsurgical skills and sound clinical experience. Early in 1971 Wilson put forward the concept of keyhole approaches which were believed to satisfy the requirements of neuromicrosurgery; but keyhole operations were not clinically practicable until 20 years after related techniques and devices had been developed. With modified conventional craniotomy, Fukushima in 1991 successfully treated aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery via an interhemispheric keyhole approach through a 3 cm-bone window.7 In 1999, Axel Perneczky published a monograph about keyhole neurosurgery,8 indicating the maturation of keyhole techniques. The so-called "keyhole" is a special concept not concentrating on anatomic definition but microtrauma in every step of operation. Usually keyhole neuromicrosurgery is designed to treat various intracranial lesions under a microscope through a small bone window with a diameter of around 2 cm. The advantages of this operation include better cosmetic results and quick rehabilitation; minimal brain exposure and iatrogenic traumatization, which decrease the risk of postoperative complications such as epilepsy, infection, hemorrhage, etc; direct approaches shortening the duration of open and closure procedures and helping surgeons to focus their attention on manipulation of intracranial lesions; less worry about operation and more confidence in healing; and early physical recovery, short hospital stay and less nursing burden. INDIVIDUALIZED DESIGN OF KEYHOLE APPROACHES During keyhole operation, keyhole craniotomy should be as small as possible but sufficient for effective surgery with the operative results as good as or even better than those of normal craniotomies. By small keyhole craniotomy, intracranial lesions especially those in deep locations can be reached according to the so-called "keyhole effect". A small keyhole bone window of about 2 cm in diameter is sufficient to meet surgical requirements for most deep lesions because within the window three instruments can be used simultaneously. Thus hemostasis can be controlled while removing a giant tumor piecemeal. The success of keyhole operation is based on preoperative design and intraoperative localization. Most intracranial lesions have fixed anatomic positions or landmarks such as intracranial aneurysms, sellar tumors, lesions at the cerebellopontine angle, intraventricular masses, etc. Under these circumstances, it is easy to choose one suitable keyhole approach, since these lesions can be located intraoperatively by associated landmarks. Sometimes, preoperative 3D-CT reconstruction locating the intracranial lesions on the scalp is recommended to improve the precision of keyhole operation. If possible, neuronavigation or stereotactic devices are much more convenient for precise orientation.9 Furthermore, a nice neuroendoscope can be assistant to many facilities intraoperatively although it is not indispensable to every keyhole operation. The neuroendoscope is only needed in case of observation of blind areas away from straight microscope light or lesions. In this way, the retraction of brain tissue and the injury of normal structures can be decreased or even avoided. There are various approaches to lesions in the same location. As to tumor in the third ventricle, for instance, interhemispheric transcallosal, infraten- torial-supracerebellar, supraorbital eyebrow or pterional keyhole approaches can be selected individually, so that the ventricle can be entered superiorly, posteriorly, anteriorly or laterally to remove the tumor. Sellar tumors also have many choices including supraorbital keyhole, transorbital- supraorbital keyhole, glabellar keyhole, pterional keyhole, subtemporal keyhole, anterior interhemispheric transcallosal keyhole and interhemispheric transcallosal transforaminal keyhole approaches. Preoperative imaging is helpful to decide the optimal approach by which the operation can be performed conveniently, avoiding injury to vital structures. The manipulating space should also be taken into account to evaluate the feasibility and advantages of the proposed approach. Normally, four anatomic spaces are utilized to treat sellar neoplasms. If necessary, the fifth space posterior to the anterior cerebral artery (A1)-internal carotid artery bifurcation-middle cerebral artery (M1) can also be used. It is worthwhile to point out that in the past the use of the fifth space was not so emphasized when judging one surgical approach, then the posterior portions of sellar tumors were often invisible intraoperatively. Freshmen who just start to perform keyhole operation should not overemphasize the small size of bone window. Instead, they should concentrate on minimal injury during the operation, which is also in accord with the rationale of keyhole neuro- microsurgery. The size of bone window can be decreased gradually. Normally large skin incision plus small craniotomy can be tried first, and if necessary the bone window can be expanded with a milling cutter for a routine operation. For the large lesion at the surface of the brain, the bone window should be made accordingly for an operation when the lesion is exposed. To severe patients with cerebral hypertension before the operation, early craniotomy plus decompressive craniectomy is recommended. PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT Conventionally, the area for sterilization is within a range of 15 cm × 15 cm around the incision. Neurosurgeons are accustomed to shave the whole hair of the patient preoperatively to prevent potential infection. It is also recognized that shaving hair in a large area can reduce the infection rate definitely. In keyhole operation, the length of an incision is about 4 cm, and shaving hair is no longer necessary. Only the hair in an area of 1 cm around the incision needs to be shaved, and this area including the hair nearby is sterilized with iodophor and subsequently covered with small gauze and plastic membrane. Unlike the hair, eyebrows are not shaved if an eyebrow keyhole approach is applied. It is also suggested that hair shaving around the incision is avoid, instead it is combed apart from the incision line and fixed before draping. Evidences have shown that cranial surgery without hair shaving is impossible to increase the risk of infection.10-12 The major procedures of keyhole microsurgery are performed to decrease intracranial pressure (ICP) and expand intracranial space for manipulation. Opening brain cisterns is the most effective way to drain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In patients with high ICP, if drugs like mannitol and fursemide are not effective, additional puncturing of brain ventricle is advisable to release CSF. In case of intracranial huge mass, local cisterns are often oppressed and even disappear, indicating difficulty in intraoperative CSF drainage. As an alternative strategy, a lumbar catheter preoperatively placed for intraoperative drainage of CSF is helpful to reduce ICP. At the completion of intracranial procedure, a watertight dural closure is made with interrupted or continuous sutures. To prevent CSF leakage, DuraGuard can be used to repair dural defect, and subsequently reinforced with medical glue. Small gelatin sponge is packed extradurally for hemostasis, and the dura is unnecessary to be hung up around the margin of craniotomy. A small bone flap is repositioned without epidural or subdural drainage. CLINICAL APPLICATION OF NEUROSURGICAL KEYHOLE OPERATION No contraindications are available for ruptured aneurysm.4,13 Operation is feasible if no marked vasospasm is demonstrated by preoperative cerebral angiography. Keyhole operation can be carried out at any stage of ruptured aneurysm, if decompressive craniectomy is not required. So far, over 100 aneurysms including more than 10 giant ones have been clipped successfully via the keyhole approach at our department. Most of these aneurysms are ruptured and were treated by emergency operation. Through the keyhole approach, the anterior clinoid process can be removed smoothly and giant aneurysms can be resected safely. Up to 5 clips have been used in one operation for clipping one giant aneurysm and for the subsequent angioplasty of the parent artery. With keyhole microsurgical techniques, Perneczky et al8 have clipped 400 aneurysms, 50% of which were treated within 3 days after rupture. Postoperative Doppler ultrasonography detected vasospasm in 24% of the patients, of whom 12% suffered from symptomatic spasm and less than 3% died. With the development of keyhole microsurgery, the expanded skull base approach has been miniaturized.6,14,15 Either subdural or epidural approaches have been used with keyhole concept. The petrous apex, the anterior clinoid process and the internal auditory canal wall can be drilled away routinely via the keyhole approach. If necessary, two keyhole approaches can be used to remove giant neoplasm in the skullbase in a one-stage operation or in other stages. The key of keyhole skull base surgery is to make a bone window directly toward the skull base. For instance, the skin incision of a supraorbital keyhole approach is hidden in eyebrow, with a bone window extending to the superciliary arch. In a normal subtemporal approach, the temporal muscle is retracted toward the base of the temporal bone. Thus the operative field is limited by the zygomatic arch. In the subtemporal keyhole approach, however, the temporal muscle is dissected and retracted bilaterally. With this approach, it is easy to reach the skull base without removal of the zygomatic arch. Hypertensive hematoma can be removed with satisfied hemostasis by keyhole operation, thus increasing the rehabilitation opportunities of paralysis and aphasia in patients, and effectively preventing the occurrence of brain hernia. Therefore it is necessary to reevaluate the operative indications for hypertensive hematoma. Surgery should be performed before severe conscious disturbance or brain hernia appears. Intracranial vascular malformations, especially those smaller than 1.5 cm, can also be removed via keyhole approaches. Intraoperative localization depends on the bleeding or calcified portions of vascular malformations or, more conveniently and precisely, neuronavigation guided with skillfully reconstructed and fused images like MRI plus MRA, CT plus CTA, or 3D-DSA.9 For the large malformations, the surgical incisions should be made according to the suggested area 2 cm wider than the discerned border of the lesions, since the real lesion usually bigger than that discerned on imaging. And bone window is suggested to be 1 cm bigger than the discerned border. Keyhole approaches are feasible in the treatment of traumatic intracranial hematomas when decompressive craniectomy is unnecessary. With the aid of a neuroendoscope, epidural hematoma caused by non-depressed skull fracture can be removed totally with sufficient hemostasis. Furthermore, absorbable hemostatic material like Surgicel is packed around the edges of the hematoma. Only localized cerebral or subdural hematoma with mild cerebral contusion is recommended to be treated via keyhole approaches to prevent postoperative hemorrhage caused by limited exposure and insufficient hemostasis under small bone window. Keyhole concepts have also been introduced in operations on the vertebral canal and spinal cord. After hemilaminectomy, intervertebral disc or tumor laterally located in the spinal canals is removed. If needed, small bony extension inferior to the spinous process can be drilled away to expose the whole posterior aspect of the spinal cord. This approach is suitable for intramedullary lesions or giant subdural neoplasms, with maximal preservation of bony structure integrity and obviously reduced risk of spinal column instability.
-
Treatment of Intracranial Lesions by Microsurgery Through Keyhole Approach in 73 Patients
周毅,敖祥生,黄星,刘汉东,张青松,徐廷伟,陈彬
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-153x.2004.01.003
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective To introduce the experience in treating intracranial lesions by microsurgery through keyhole approach. Methods Of the 73 patients, 31 suffered from pituitary adenoma, 7 craniopharyngiomas, 13 acoustic neuromas, 3 aneurysms of the posterior communicating arteries, 2 meningiomas in cerebellopontine angles (CPA), 2 trigeminal neuralgia, 2 cerebellar hemangioblasto-mas, 2 arachnoid cysts, and 11 intracranial hematomas. The operative approaches included supraorbital keyhole approach in 38, post-mastoidal in 19, pterion in 5, and temporal in 11. Results Of 55 patients with intracranial tumors, 46 received total or subtotal excision of the tumors and 9 partial. Three aneurysms were well clamped. The results of the other cases were also good. No complication related to the operative approach occurred. Conclusions The keyhole approach is minimally invasive, and especially suitable for treating the intracranial deep lesions.
-
Treatment of Skull Base Communicating Tumor with Endoscopeassisted Microneurosurgery and Diode Laser
Pan Jian-wei,Zhan Ren-ya,Tong Ying,Zheng Jie-sheng,Wan Shu,Huang Hong-guang,Ma Yue-hui,Zhou Yong-qing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00029330-200702020-00017
2007-01-01
Abstract:The skull base communicating tumor is characterized by simultaneous invasion of the intracranial and extracranial structures. The tumor may originate from the intracranial structures and invade extracranially, or vice versa. The total resection of the tumor is difficult, and a lot of complications may occur after the operation.1 From September 1998 to September 2002, 21 patients with skull base communicating tumors were treated in our hospital by endoscope-assisted microneurosurgery combined with diode laser through different operative approaches. CLINICAL DATA Manifestations Of the 21 cases, 12 were men and 9 were women, with a mean age of (39.8±10.7) years (9 to 68 years) and a mean course of the disease of (21.4±18.6) months (2 weeks to 5 years). The patients presented with headache and dizziness in 6 (28.6%), facial numbness in 3 (14.3%), exophthalmus in 6 (28.6%), ophthalmoplegia and diplopia in 5 (23.8%), visual regression in 5 (23.8%), rhinostegnosis in 6 (28.6%), somatasthenia in 1 (4.8%), temporal mass in 2 (9.5%), occipitocervical mass in 1 (4.8%), acoustic regression in 2 (9.5%), and multiple yellow papula in 1 (4.8%). Radiological features CT and MRI showed that the communicating tumors located at the anterior skull base in 10 patients, middle skull base in 6, posterior skull base in 2, and anterior-middle skull base in 3. Three-dimensional CT was performed in 7 patients to identify the tumor territory and the relationship between the tumor and the vessels. Nine tumors with abundant blood supply were evaluated by the digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and the ipsilateral external carotid arteries were embolized in 3 cases. Surgical treatment and prognosis All the patients underwent microsurgical operation through different operative approaches according to the nature and extent of the tumors (Table). During the operation, variously angled neuroendoscopes (ASCULP, Gemany) were used to observe the tumor and neurovascular structures in the region out of the microscopic field (Leica, Gemany). The diode laser (DioMED60, England) was utilized to liberate, vaporize and resect the tumor. The extracranial part of the tumor was removed before resecting the intracranial part. To the best of our abilities, vascular and malignant tumors were resected en bloc, and other benign tumors were removed bit by bit to reduce the injury of the normal structures (esp. brain tissue). Skull base was reconstructed after the tumor removal.Table: Pathology and extent of skull base communicating tumor and operative approachEach of the patients with squamous carcinoma at the anterior skull base, and osteochondroma, racemosum hemangioma, and meningioma at the middle skull base received subtotal resection; and each of the patients with esthesioneuroblastoma at the anterior skull base and osteosarcoma at the middle skull base underwent partial resection; the tumor of the other cases were totally resected. No operative mortality and severe complication occurred. The 6 patients received subtotal or partial resection resection and one patient with a totally resected squamous carcinoma were treated with radiotherapy or γ-knife after the operation. The patients were followed up for 2 to 5 years (mean 3.4±0.8). One of them who had an osteosarcoma at the middle skull base died, and two patients with a partially resected esthesioneuroblastoma or a subtotally resected squamous carcinoma had recurrence (Fig.).Fig.: Contrast enhanced MRI of a facial neurilemmoma. A: Before the operation, the tumor located at the middle cranial fossa. B: Before the operation, the tumor invaded into the petrous bone and subtemporal fossa.DISCUSSION The skull base communicating tumors invade several anatomical regions close to the neurovascular structures. The removal of these tumors is difficult and postoperative complications are frequent. The diagnosis of the tumor and the choice of operative approach and method depend on the results of CT, 3D-CT, MRI, and DSA. According to the location, size, property, and adjacent structures of the communicating tumors, the option of operative approach is varied.2 Our 21 cases were treated by transfrontal, pterion, transsphenoid, transoral, median suboccipital, paralateronasal, preauricular subtemporal, combined craniofacial approaches, respectively, and achieved satisfactory results. The paralateronasal, preauricular subtemporal and combined craniofacial approaches are rational when the extent and property of the tumor are uncertain. The incision can be extended along the upper orbital rim to the frontal region according to the extent of tumor when the paralateronasal approach is used.3 This approach is suitable for the communicating tumors at the anterior skull base, because the traction of the brain tissue is slight when the affected intraorbital tissues, ethmoid plate, and dura mater were resected, but the tumor invading the middle cranial fossa cannot be totally removed by the approach. Preauricular subtemporal approach4 can expose not only the middle and anterior skull base, but also the deep frontal and temporal structures and lesions by mildly tracting the frontal and temporal lobes. The approach prefer to the tumor in the cavernous sinus, petrous apex, upper and middle clivus, infratemporal fossa, pterygopalatine fossa, and nasopharyngeal region. It often results in satisfactory outcomes in patients with communicating tumors at the middle skull base (esp. epidural tumor) and mildly injured brain tissue. Combined craniofacial approach5 is helpful to determine the extent of the tumor and thoroughly remove the tumor invading the anterior and middle cranial fossa en bloc. By using the approach, the malignant tumor can be removed, and the important neurovascular structures (e.g. the brain tissues, cranial nerve, internal carotid artery, and cavernous sinus) can be protected, the skull base can be reconstructed, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage can be prevented. However, with this approach, the brain tissue is often pulled obviously, resulting in severe cerebral edema after the operation. The skull base communicating tumors have abundant blood supply and are always supplied by the external and internal carotid arteries simultaneously. Therefore, preoperative handling of the vessels supplying the tumor is crucial to reduce intraoperative bleeding. To the tumors with extensive invasion and abundant blood supply, endovascular embolization and the ligation of the external or common carotid artery should be done before the operation. Because the skull base communicating tumor has an extensive invasion (esp. the vascular and malignant tumors), it is hard to expose and remove it en bloc under a microscope, the residual tumor and injuries of the neurovascular structures caused by operation often affect the prognosis. Endoscope-assisted microneurosurgery can not only protect the important vessels and nerves at the skull base, but also reduce the incidence of other important structures injury,6 and thus can totally remove the tumor that was impossible to resect in the past. In this study, based on our knowledge on endoscopic microanatomy, variously angled endoscopes were used to observe the areas out of the microscopic field to avoid blind manipulation, especially for the resection of the intracranial part of the tumor. The angled endoscopes are able to uncover the important nerves and vessels (such as internal carotid artery, optic nerve etc.), improve the possibility of en bloc resection of vascular or malignant tumors, reduce the traction of the brain tissue and the unnecessary exposure during the operation. After the removal of the tumor, the endoscope was utilized to explore the areas behind the neurovascular structures and the traction of the nerves and vessels was not necessary when the residual tumor was vaporized and removed by diode laser.7 The diode laser can reduce the incidence of residue and recurrent of the tumor. Because the narrow endoscopic caliber limits the visual field and the variability of location after entering the cranium, the best operative approach should be adopted in terms of the position of the tumor. The diode laser can greatly increase the temperature of the irradiated tissues, resulting in protein denaturation, coagulation and necrosis, and even charing and vaporization. The laser is effective on the dissection, hemostasis, and vaporization of the tumor at the skull base, especially for those which had abundant blood supply and is hard to be excised, or located at the important regions (e.g. the vicinity of brainstem) that cannot be pulled. Diode laser can reduce bleeding and keep clear visual field, eliminate traction and shorten operative time.8 Low power laser (1−5 W) is useful to coagulate and shrink the tumor capsule and coagulate the blood vessels in the surface, while high power laser (5−10 W) can be used in intracystic excision. The power should be adjusted according to the blood supply, and property and location of the tumor. The high power laser is suitable for the tumor with abundant blood supply, but not for the tumor in the regions near the important structures. Thus elevating the power of laser within a safe extent can improve the velocity of dissection and shorten operative time. In addition, the effect of sterilization of the diode laser can provide a good sterile environment for operation, reduce the secondary infection, which is important for a skull base communicating tumor. In this study, all the patients except one survived without severe complications after the microsurgery with a high rate of total resection. The dural defect after resection of the communicating tumor at the skull base followed by intracranial infection may result in cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Therefore, the skull base reconstruction is very important. To prevent postoperative complications, dura mater must be repaired closely in skull base reconstruction. The free or pedicle graft should be put outside to strengthen the dura mater, and the skull base bone defect should be repaired if necessary.9 In all of our patients, the skull base was reconstructed, the dura mater was repaired by pericranium, temporal aponeurosis, and temporal muscle flap, and the bone was restored using titanium plate or self-bone if the diameter of the defect was over 3 cm. The extracranial tumor cavity was filled by temporal muscle or fat. No complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage and intracranial infection occurred in our patients.
-
Clinical application of transcranial neuroendoscopy combined with supraorbital keyhole approach in minimally invasive surgery of the anterior skull base
Long Zhou,Xiongfei Jing,Chang Wang,Huikai Zhang,Pan Lei,Ping Song,Zhiyang Li,Lun Gao,Minghui Lu,Qianxue Chen,Qiang Cai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65758-y
2024-06-27
Abstract:To explore the techniques, safety, and feasibility of minimally invasive neurosurgery through the supraorbital eyebrow arch keyhole approach by neuroendoscopy. Retrospective analysis of clinical data of patients with various cranial diseases treated by transcranial neuroendoscopic supraorbital eyebrow keyhole approach in our hospital from March 2021 to October 2023. A total of 39 complete cases were collected, including 21 cases of intracranial aneurysms, 9 cases of intracranial space occupying lesions, 5 cases of brain trauma, 3 cases of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea, and 1 case of cerebral hemorrhage. All patients' surgeries were successful. The good prognosis rate of intracranial aneurysms was 17/21 (81%), and the symptom improvement rate of intracranial space occupying lesions was 8/9 (88.9%). Among them, the initial symptoms of one patient with no improvement were not related to space occupying, while the total effective rate of the other three types of patients was 9/9 (100%). The average length of the craniotomy bone window of the supraorbital eyebrow arch keyhole is 3.77 ± 0.31 cm, and the average width is 2.53 ± 0.23 cm. The average postoperative hospital stay was 14.77 ± 6.59 days. The average clearance rate of hematoma by neuroendoscopy is 95.00% ± 1.51%. Our results indicate that endoscopic surgery through the supraorbital eyebrow arch keyhole approach is safe and effective for the treatment of anterior skull base lesions and cerebral hemorrhage. However, this retrospective study is a single center, small sample study, and the good surgical results do not exclude the subjective screening of suitable patients by clinical surgeons, which may have some bias. Although the clinical characteristics such as indications and contraindications of this surgical method still require further prospective and multicenter clinical research validation, our study still provides a new approach and choice for minimally invasive surgical treatment of anterior skull base lesions.
-
Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with Keyhole Approach Microsurgery
兰青,张全斌,沈利明,黄强
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-2897.2002.04.005
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective To improve the approach for treatment of intracranial aneurysms and achieve the best results with minimal invasion during microsurgery. Methods According to the position of aneurysm , keyhole approach was designed precisely for microsurgery and the bone window was about 2 cm in diameter. Among 32 operations, supraorbital eyebrow keyhole approach was used in 28 and retromastoid keyhole approach in 2, unifrontal interhemispheric keyhole approach in 1, pterional keyhole approach in 1. Results There were 32 patients with 35 aneurysms. After these 32 operations by keyhole approach, 33 aneurysms were clipped, one aneurysm trapped and the rest one wrapped. Three patients with two aneurysms were also treated through one keyhole. There were no infection, bleeding or cerebrospinal fluid leakage after operations. Conclusion Keyhole approach microsurgery is an effective and ideal therapeutic method for intracranial aneurysm with its minimal invasion, good result and economic expense.
-
Robotics in keyhole transcranial endoscope-assisted microsurgery: a critical review of existing systems and proposed specifications for new robotic platforms.
Hani J Marcus,Carlo A Seneci,Christopher J Payne,Dipankar Nandi,Ara Darzi,Guang-Zhong Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000123
IF: 5.315
2014-01-01
Neurosurgery
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Over the past decade, advances in image guidance, endoscopy, and tube-shaft instruments have allowed for the further development of keyhole transcranial endoscope-assisted microsurgery, utilizing smaller craniotomies and minimizing exposure and manipulation of unaffected brain tissue. Although such approaches offer the possibility of shorter operating times, reduced morbidity and mortality, and improved long-term outcomes, the technical skills required to perform such surgery are inevitably greater than for traditional open surgical techniques, and they have not been widely adopted by neurosurgeons. Surgical robotics, which has the ability to improve visualization and increase dexterity, therefore has the potential to enhance surgical performance.
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the role of surgical robots in keyhole transcranial endoscope-assisted microsurgery.
METHODS:The technical challenges faced by surgeons utilizing keyhole craniotomies were reviewed, and a thorough appraisal of presently available robotic systems was performed.
RESULTS:Surgical robotic systems have the potential to incorporate advances in augmented reality, stereoendoscopy, and jointed-wrist instruments, and therefore to significantly impact the field of keyhole neurosurgery. To date, over 30 robotic systems have been applied to neurosurgical procedures. The vast majority of these robots are best described as supervisory controlled, and are designed for stereotactic or image-guided surgery. Few telesurgical robots are suitable for keyhole neurosurgical approaches, and none are in widespread clinical use in the field.
CONCLUSION:New robotic platforms in minimally invasive neurosurgery must possess clear and unambiguous advantages over conventional approaches if they are to achieve significant clinical penetration.
-
Microsurgical Experience with Keyhole Operations on Intracranial Aneurysms.
Qing Lan,Zhigang Gong,Dezhi Kang,Hengzhu Zhang,Zhiyuan Qian,Jian Chen,Qiang Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2006.06.039
2006-01-01
Surgical Neurology
Abstract:Background: We report our experience with keyhole approaches as favorable treatments for various intracranial aneurysms including multiple aneurysms and giant aneurysms.Methods: According to the different locations of 105 aneurysms harbored in 100 patients, different keyhole approaches were designed elaborately, among which a supraorbital keyhole approach was used in 91 cases, a pterional keyhole approach in 5 cases, a subtemporal keyhole approach in 3 cases, a retromastoid keyhole approach in 2 cases, and a unifrontal interhemispheric keyhole approach in 1 case.Results: Among those 105 aneurysms, 99 were clipped successfully, including 4 that were resected after clipping. One mini-aneurysm was wrapped. The other aneurysms were trapped, including 1 VA aneurysm, 1 giant ICA aneurysm, 1 giant PCoA aneurysm, and 2 giant aneurysms in the PCAs (P2-P3 segment). Multiple aneurysms in 5 cases were treated in 1 surgical session, including 3 cases via unilateral approaches and 2 cases via bilateral approaches. There were no severe keyhole approach-related complications in this present series.Conclusion: The keyhole approaches, based on improvements in diagnostic imaging, advanced surgical instruments, and microsurgical skills, are effective and ideal craniotomy techniques in the hands of experienced neurosurgeons for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, including multiple and giant aneurysms, in patients without diffuse SAH, severe cerebral vasospasm, and severe brain edema or brain swelling. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Inc.
-
Microsurgical treatment for intracranial aneurysms by keyhole approach
Wu Zanyi,Kang Dezhi,Lan Qing
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the feasibility and effect of microsurgical treatment for intracranial aneurysms by keyhole approach.Methods The clinical data of 391 patients with 415 aneurysms were analyzed retrospectively.All the patients underwent keyhole microsurgical treatments including supraorbital keyhole approach in 127 patients,pterional keyhole approach in 257,subtemporal keyhole approach in 2,longitudinal fissure keyhole in 5.Neurophysiological monitoring was performed in 103 patients and assisted by neuroendoscopy in 15.Results The follow-up period ranged from 2 weeks to 84 months:including 399(96.1%) successfully clipped aneurysms,8 ones wrapped alone,5 ones trapped,3 ones trapped plus resected.Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS) score revealed 366(93.6%) patients recovered well,12(3.1%) had disability to varying degrees and 13(3.3%) died.Conclusions Microsurgical treatment via the keyhole is an ideal method for intracranial aneurysms.Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and neuroendoscopy can increase success rate and safety of operation.
-
Minimally invasive keyhole craniotomies for microsurgical clipping of cerebral aneurysms: comparative meta-analysis of the mini-pterional and supraorbital keyhole approaches
Nolan J Brown,Julian Gendreau,Saarang Patel,Redi Rahmani,Joshua S Catapano,Michael T Lawton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-02531-9
2024-07-26
Abstract:Objective: Axel Perneczky is responsible for conceptualizing the "keyhole" philosophy as a new paradigm of minimal invasiveness within cranial neurosurgery. Keyhole neurosurgery aims to limit approach-related traumatization and minimize brain retraction while still enabling the neurosurgeon to achieve operative goals. The supraorbital keyhole craniotomy (SOKC) and minipterional (pterional keyhole, PKC) approaches have become mainstays for clipping intracranial aneurysms. While studies have compared these approaches to the traditional pterional craniotomy for clipping cerebral aneurysms, head-to-head comparisons of these workhorse keyhole approaches remain limited. Methods: The authors queried three databases per PRISMA guidelines to identify all studies comparing the SOKC to the PKC for microsurgical clipping of cerebral aneurysms. Of 148 unique studies returned on initial query, a total of 5 studies published between 2013 and 2019 met inclusion criteria. Where applicable, quantitative meta-analysis was performed via the Mantel-Haenszel method using Review Manager v5.4 (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool, and all studies were assigned a Level of Evidence (I-V). Results: Across all five studies, the mean age ranged from 53.0 to 57.5 years old, and the cohort consisted of more females (n = 403, 60.6%) than males. The proportion of patients presenting with ruptured aneurysmal SAH was comparable between the SOKC and PKC cohorts (p = 0.43). Clipping rate [defined as the rate of successful aneurysm clip deployment with successful intraoperative occlusion] (OR 1.52 [0.49, 4.71], I2 = 0%, p = 0.47), final occlusion rates (OR 1.27 [0.37, 4.32], p = 0.70), and operative durations (SMD 0.33 [-0.83. 1.49], I2 = 97%, p = 0.58) were comparable regardless of approach used. Furthermore, rates of intraoperative rupture (OR 1.51 [0.64, 3.55], I2 = 0, p = 0.34), postoperative hemorrhage (OR 1.49 [0.74, 3.01], I2 = 0, p = 0.26), postoperative vasospasm (OR 0.94 [0.49, 1.80], I2 = 63, p = 0.86), and postoperative infection (OR 0.70 [0.16, 2.99], I2 = 0%, p = 0.63) were equivocal across SOKC and PKC cohorts. Conclusion: The PKC and SOKC approaches appear to afford comparable outcomes when used for open microsurgical clipping of cerebral aneurysms in select patients with both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Both are associated with excellent clipping and occlusion rates, minimal perioperative complication profiles, and favorable postoperative neurologic outcomes. Further investigations are merited so clinicians can further parse out the indications and contraindications for each keyhole approach.
-
Microanatomic Study on Retrosigmoid Keyhole Approach
LI Ze-qun,LAN Qing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2009.04.015
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective The aim of the present study was to assess the retrosigmoid keyhole approach on a cadaveric model by using a neuronavigation system, and explore its indications. Methods Six cadaveric heads (twelve sides) injected with colored latex were used. The retrosigmoid keyhole approach was followed by the conventional retrosigmoid approach. The exposure areas of petroclivus and brainstem were measured and calculated under stryker frameless stereotactic navigation. Angles of attack for six different target points, which included the Meckle's cave, trigeminal nerve root, internal auditory meatal, facial nerve root, jugular foramen and glossopharyngeal nerve root, were measured. The exposure area and angles of attack between the two approacbes were compared and analyzed by student's t test. Results The retrosigmoid keyhole approach exposes nearly the same anatomic architecture as that of conventional approach, namely, it can expose the area superior to the anteriolateral margin of the tentorium, inferior to the foramen Magnum, medial to the anteriolateral of pons and medulla. The anatomic structure deeply seated in the ispilateral petroclivus can also be observed clearly through the cranial nerve intervals. Exposure area at the petroclivus and brainstem under the retrosignaoid keyhole approach was (304.73±28.93) mm2 and (143.9±31.87)mm2, respectively. The counterpart of the conventional retrosigmoid approach was (346.43 ±42.80) mm2 and (136.05±9.05) mm2, respectively. No statistical difference lies in the exposure area (P > 0.05). The vertical and horizontal attack angles under the conventional approach were wider than those of the keyhole approach at the selected six target points (P < 0.05). Conclusion The retrosigmoid keyhole approach provides similar exposure with that of the conventional retrosigmoid approach, not only can be used in microvascular decompression, also can be used to resect tumors located in cerebellopontine angle, upper petroclivus, middle petroclivus, anteriolateral of midbrain and pons. Key words: Keyhole surgery; Retrosigmoid approach; Cerebellopontine angle; Microanatomy
-
The study of endoscope-assisted microsurgical anatomy on the far-lateral keyhole approach
Jie CAO,Xingyu MIAO,Wei SHI
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective The feasibility of endoscope-assisted microsurgical surgery via the far-lateral partial transcondylar keyhole approach and its endoscopic anatomy are investigated. Methods A total of 8( 16 sides) adult moist heads with connected neck were used to simulate the procedures of the far-lateral partial transcondylar keyhole approach under the microscope and neuroendoscope. Results The application of neuroendoscope could increase the operative view angle and sufficiently expose the ventrolateral medulla oblongata,partial postero-inferior cerebellar artery,whole segment of hypoglossal nerve,the borderline of vertebral artery and postero-inferior cerebellar artery,lower cranial nerves entered jugular foramen,and vestibulofacial nerve. Conclusion Endoscope-assisted microsurgery via the far-lateral partial transcondylar keyhole approach is feasible and the application of neuroendoscope can decrease the surgical injury.
-
[Microsurgical Treatment of Complex Intracranial Aneurysms Via Keyhole Approaches].
Qing Lan,Jian Chen,Zhi-yuan Qian,Quan-bin Zhang,Qiang Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j:issn:0376-2491.2007.13.003
2007-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the feasibility and effect of microsurgical treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms via keyhole approaches.METHODS:Operation via keyhole approach was performed on thirty-one patients with 42 complex intracranial aneurysms were operated on, including 2 internal carotid artery bifurcation aneurysms, 1 anterior cerebral artery aneurysm, 12 posterior communicating artery aneurysms, 2 anterior choroids artery aneurysms, 7 middle cerebral artery aneurysms, 6 anterior communicating artery aneurysms, 2 basilar artery aneurysms, 2 vertebral artery aneurysms, 4 posterior cerebral artery aneurysms and 4 ophthalmic artery aneurysms, among which were 10 cases with multiple intracranial aneurysms, 14 with giant aneurysms, and 7 with posterior circulation aneurysms, and 4 aneurysms clipped by drilling off anterior clinoid process. Six of the 31 patients who had giant aneurysms came to hospital because of the symptoms, such as dizziness, headache, oculomotor paralysis, loss of vision, etc, and the other 25 patients were grouped according to the subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) Grade: 5 in grade I, 12 in grade II, 7 in grade III and 1 in grade IV. Eight patients were operated on after SAH in the early-phase, while 8 in the middle-phase and 9 in the late-phase. The supraorbital subfrontal keyhole approach was used 25 times, the pterional approach 5 times, the subtemporal approach 3 times, and both the suboccipital lateral approach and the retromastoid approach once.RESULTS:31 of the 42 aneurysms were clipped, 2 mini-aneurysms wrapped, 5 giant aneurysms clipped and resected, 2 aneurysms trapped with thrombotic aneurysm partially resected, 1 aneurysm trapped, while 1 ruptured before operation and untreated. Short-term Glasgow outcome scoring showed good recovery in 27 patients, moderate disability in 2, and death in 2.CONCLUSION:Operation via keyhole approaches effectively controls the immature rupture of intracranial aneurysm, removes anterior clinoid process, respects giant aneurysm, and reconstructs the parent artery of wide-neck aneurysm. Based on individualized surgical approaches and excellent microsurgical skills, the complex intracranial aneurysms can be treated safely, directly and effectively via minimally invasive keyhole approaches.
-
Microsurgical anatomy of the presigmoid translabyrinthine keyhole approach
WU Chen-yi,LAN Qing,吴臣义,兰青
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-2036.2007.03.004
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To design a new presigmoid translabyrinthine keyhole approach assisted by Stryker neuro-navigation system according to the keyhole idea,and observe microscopic anatomy structures, which could be.regarded as the bases of this approach in clinical application.Methods Navigation data were established on 8 cadaveric heads fixed by formalin and perfused intracranial vessels with colored silicone. A 7-cm postauricular C-shaped skin incision as we reported was performed.After elevating the skin flap and musculofascial flap,a 3.5 cm×3.0 cm bone window was made.On skeletonizing the sigmoid sinus,bony lab- yrinth and the canal for facial nerve,the presigmoid retrolabyrinthine,partial labyrinthectomy with petrous api- cectomy,translabyrinthine keyhole approaches were simulated in turn.The length of important structures ex- posed and the angle of vision were measured step by step, and the anatomic structures were observed.Re- suits The approach-correlated bone could precisely be drilled with the aid of neuro-navigation,which could avoid the bewilder in drilling process.The angles of visual field,the length of clivus andⅦcranial nerve were significantly increased after partial labyrinthectomy with petrous apicectomy or all labyrinth removal,but there were no significant difference between partial and all labyrinth removal.The retrolabyrinthine keyhole approach spares hearing and facial function but provided for limited window of petroclival region exposure.The partial labyrinthectomy with petrous apicectomy keyhole approach provided wider exposure to petroclival region,cere- bellopontine angle,prepontine region and posterior cavernous sinus;an area between theⅢ-XI cranial nerves was easily visible with an excellent chance of hearing and facial nerve preservation.The translabyrin- thine keyhole approach,producing more morbidity,provided for greater versatility in treating lesions,added little exposure of petroclival region.Conclusion The presigmoid translabyrinthine keyhole approach,which could provide excellent exposure of the petroclival region,was feasible to be performed in our study.The ap- proach-correlated bone could be precisely removed assisted by neuro-navigation system.The exposure was oh- viously increased hy partial labyrinthectomy with petrous apicectomy or all labyrinthine removal,the former provided an excellent chancre of hearing and facial nerve preservation.
-
Effect of microscopic keyhole surgery on neurological function and prognosis of patients with intracranial small meningioma
Jinfang Xu,Longlong Fan,Feng Zhou,Hong Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19193/0393-6384_2022_6_558
2022-01-01
Acta medica mediterranea
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effect of keyhole surgery under the microscope on the neurologic function and prognosis of patients with intracranial small meningioma, and to verify the clinical efficacy of keyhole surgery under the microscope. Methods: As research subjects, 62 patients admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to December 2018 were included. They were divided into a control group and an observation group. The clinical data for the two groups of patients were analysed retrospectively. Patients in the control group underwent routine craniotomy. Observation group patients underwent keyhole surgery under the microscope. The postoperative neurological function and prognosis of the two groups of patients were compared and analysed, to verify the effects of keyhole surgery under the microscope in the treatment of intracranial small meningioma. The blood loss and operation time of the two groups of patients were also compared. In addition, the neurological function, complications, and prognosis of patients after operation were compared. Results: The results showed that the patients in the control group experienced more intraoperative blood loss and longer operation times. The probability of postoperative complications was also found to be higher. The neurological function and prognosis of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group. In the observation group, patients who underwent keyhole surgery under the microscope, neurologic function was less affected, and the operation was smoother. The prognosis and complications were also significantly better than those of the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: Keyhole surgery under the microscope has significantly better effects than routine craniotomy on the treatment of intracranial small meningiomas. Keyhole surgery optimizes the surgical procedure, reduces the risk of complications, reduces the impact on the patients neurologic function, and yields improved prognosis.
-
Keyhole approach to surgical removal of supratentorial lesions: Clinical analysis of 71 cases
Jin-song LI,Han-dong WANG,Chun-hua HANG,Xiang-yu LIU,Dai PENG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16571/j.cnki.1008-8199.2014.01.015
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective Reducing complications and accelerate postoperative rehabilitation has been a hotspot in neurosurgery research at present. This study aimed to find a new approach to the surgical treatment of supratentorial lesions,which could reduce damage to the nerve tissue and achieve minimal invasiveness. Methods With the help of MRI,CT and neural navigation,we removed 71 supratentorial tumors in the brain by the straight incision keyhole approach through the small ossicle window. Results Seventy of the 71 tumors were accurately positioned,with only 1 at 0. 5 cm outside the margin of the ossicle window. All the tumors were removed totally. Nervous function was aggravated after operation in 5 of the cases in which the lesions were located in the functional areas,of which 4 were fully and 1 partly recovered. The mean hospital stay of the patients was( 11. 3 ± 0. 9) d,as compared with the average hospital stay of 17. 3 d in the same period. The intraoperative blood transfusion averaged( 75. 8 ± 8. 7) mL,and the mean operation time was( 2. 4 ± 0. 5) h. Conclusion The straight incision keyhole approach to the removal of supratentorial cerebral tumors is a safe,effective and minimally invasive surgical option.
-
Microsurgical Clipping of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms Via the Keyhole Approach
Wei Qian,Yanming Chen,Qing Zhu,Ailin Chen,Qing Lan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.075
IF: 2.21
2024-01-01
World Neurosurgery
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Keyhole surgery has been widely used to clip various intracranial aneurysms. Here, the feasibility of microsurgical clipping of multiple intracranial aneurysms via the keyhole approach was further investigated. METHODS: The clinical data of 80 patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms treated with keyhole surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The patients included 25 males and 55 females, with an average age of 57.5 years. There were 13 patients with unruptured aneurysms, 67 patients with ruptured aneurysms (small aneurysms accounted for 52.2% of ruptured aneurysms), and a total of 198 aneurysms. A 4 cm incision and a bone hole of approximately 2.5 cm were used per craniotomy standards. Forty-eight cases were treated via the supraorbital keyhole approach, 45 cases via the pterional keyhole approach, and 3 cases via the interhemispheric keyhole approach. RESULTS: A bilateral and unilateral keyhole approach was applied in 18 and 62 cases, respectively. A total of 170 ipsilateral and 7 contralateral aneurysms were clipped. The complete clipping rate was 98.9%. During the followp period of 6-12 months after surgery, the Glasgow outcome scale score was 5 points in 74 cases, 4 points in 5 cases, and 3 points in 1 case. The prognosis was associated with the preoperative Hunt -Hess classification but not with the number of operative sides, the operation opportunity, or the number of clipped aneurysms. CONCLUSION: Early keyhole surgical clipping of multiple intracranial aneurysms is an effective treatment. Among ruptured aneurysms, small aneurysms are common and need attention and timely treatment.
-
Keyhole Approach in the Neuroendoscopic Treatment for Hydrocephalus
Qiang Cai,Xiangyang Zhang,Long Wang,Shulan Huang,Zhibiao Chen,Qianxue Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000005823
IF: 1.6
2017-01-01
Medicine
Abstract:The aim of the study was to explore keyhole approach and dura suture in the neuroendoscopic treatment for hydrocephalus.Twelve cases of hydrocephalus patients who were treated with neuroendoscope by this approach were analyzed retrospectively from April 2015 to April 2016 in our department. The basic steps of this procedure was using drill and milling cutter to form a small bone flap instead of burr hole, and then making a cruciate incision on the dura. After endoscopic third ventriculostomy or endoscopic third ventriculostomy+ventriculocystostomy finished, dura was sutured and the bone flap was reset.All 12 patients could suture dura effectively, and no cerebrospinal fluid leak and subcutaneous cerebrospinal fluid collection happened; symptoms of hydrocephalus were also improved. Moreover, during the operation, we found this approach could suspend dura, and avoid the cerebral sulcus and cortical coarse vein effectively, which could reduce the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. In addition, we found this approach could increase the reachable range of the neuroendoscope significantly.Keyhole approach can suture dura and avoid the cerebral sulcus and cortical coarse vein effectively, increase the indications, and reduce complications of neuroendoscope. So, this approach has clinical values and can be used in hydrocephalus.
-
Endoscopic Anatomy Study on the Keyhole Approach Via an Operative Corridor of the Zygomatico Sphenoidal Region
Zhijun Dai
2000-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the endoscope anatomy of the ‘keyhole’ approach via a surface corridor of sphenoidal ridge behind the zagomatic process,and discuss the clinical feasibility to reach Williss circle and its adjacent structurs via this approach. Methods 6 adult cadavers head soaked in fomalin and 4 fresh children cadavers heads were studied with 0° soft endoscope and 0°、6°、30° hard endoscopes alternatively via ‘keyhole’ approach,which located between posterior border of frontomalar and external border of sphenoidal ridge.Transverse incision was made 1 5~2cm above zagomatic arch and the skull window was about 1cm in diameter.The operative corridor was between subdural and epiarachnoid space, from frontal base surface to posterior border of sphenoidal ridge.The Williss circle and adjacent regions could be reached via this approach.Results The incision is located lateral to the eyebrow end, and the key hole is located at a dimple of lateral great wing surface between zygomatic process and sphenoid crest. The operative corridor is between the dura and arachnoid via this approach, the Willis circle, sella, cavernous sinus and petroclivus area, even contralateral ICA. can be reached.Conclusion (1) The ‘keyhole’ technique is selected individually depend on conditions of the imaging examination as well as the lesion of the patient. It is a minimally invasive technique and can reduce the operative trauma. (2) The major factor for correctly reaching the lesion is to approach according to certain anatomic marks but not the approaching angle and depth. (3) The approach is in the epiarachnoid space and the arachnoid should be kept intact to protecting brain debri covering the visual field. (4) The marks of road mapping for this approach include frontal base, sphenoid crest,margin of sphenoidal crest, anterior clinoid process,optic nerve and C 1 segment, also it is important that the path way of road mapping for this approach need to be kept in mind.
-
Endoscopically Assisted Targeted Keyhole Retrosigmoid Approaches for Microvascular Decompression: Quantitative Anatomic Study
Evgenii Belykh,Naomi R Onaka,Xiaochun Zhao,Claudio Cavallo,Kaan Yağmurlu,Ting Lei,Vadim A Byvaltsev,Mark C Preul,Peter Nakaji
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.218
Abstract:Objective: We describe and quantitatively assess minimally invasive keyhole retrosigmoid approaches targeted to the upper, middle, and lower cranial nerve (CN) complexes of the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). Methods: Anatomic dissections were performed on 10 sides of 5 fixed, silicone-injected cadaver heads. Surgical views through various trajectories were assessed in endoscopic videos and 3-dimensional (3D) interactive virtual reality microscope views. Surgical freedom and angles of attack to the proximal and distal areas of CN complexes of the CPA were compared among upper and lower keyholes and conventional retrosigmoid craniotomy using neuronavigation. Results: Compared with keyholes, the conventional approach had superior surgical freedom to most areas except for the distal CN V, the root of CN VII, and the root of CN IX, where differences were not significant. The conventional retrosigmoid approach provided a larger horizontal angle of attack than either the upper or lower keyholes for all selected areas; however, the vertical angles of attack were not different. Splitting the petrosal fissure resulted in a significant increase in the vertical angle of attack to the root zones of CNs V and VII but not to the distal areas of these nerves or CN IX. Illustrative cases of endoscope-assisted keyhole retrosigmoid approaches for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, and glossopharyngeal neuralgia are presented. Conclusions: Targeted keyhole retrosigmoid approaches require detailed understanding of the 3D anatomy of the CPA to create appropriate locations of corridors, including skin incisions and keyholes. Endoscope assistance complements the standard microsurgical technique by maximizing the visualization and identification of the delicate neurovascular structures.
-
Microanatomical Observation of Extreme Lateral Supracerebellar Infratentorial Keyhole Approach
Jia-jun Dong,Yi Wu,Zhong-ping Chen
2009-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE:Minimally invasive surgery is the basic concept of modern neurosurgery.The objective of this study is to imitate a extreme lateral supracerebellar infratentorial keyhole approach using keyhole conception,which can be regard as reference in clinic.METHODS:The extreme lateral supracerebellar infratentorial keyhole approach was imitated in ten adult cadaver heads fixed in 10% formalin and perfused intracranial vessels with colored silicone.The cadaver head in lateral position was turned to the opposite side at 95 to105 degrees.A vertical linear epifascial skin incision of approximately 5cm was created from the point 0.5cm above the asterion.After a burr hole was drilled at the asterion,the craniotomy about 2.5cm in diameter was made.Bone window was at the junction of the transverse sinus and sigmoid sinus.The anatomic structures were observed under surgical microscope when the dura was open.RESULT:The posterior aspect of the tentorial cerebellar surface of the cerebellum was retracted ventrally along the anterolateral margin of the cerebellar hemisphere.The observation of the superior petrosal vein,the root of the trigeminal nerve,Meckel cave were applied with clear view.The superior cerebellar artery usually passes medial to the root of the trigeminal nerve,and become compression to its ventromedial side.The trochlear nerve runs in the posterolateral and lateral incisural space,partially covered by the arachnoidal fibers of the ambient cistern.The nerve is almost always easily identifiable.CONCLUSIONS:The extreme lateral supracerebellar infratentorial keyhole approach is anatomical practicable.Through a craniotomy approximately 2.5cm in diameter,distinct exposure of the superior petrosal vein,the root of the trigeminal nerve,Meckel cave,the lateral structures of the mesencephalon are clear.It can certainly be used as an alternative to deal with lesions of the lateral mesencephalon.