Long‐term Treatment Course of a Patient with Mild Haemophilia A Who Developed a High Titre Factor VIII Inhibitor
Futoshi Iioka,Daiki Shimomura,Fumihiko Nakamura,Hitoshi Ohno,Koji Yada,Keiji Nogami,Midori Shima
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.12491
2014-01-01
Haemophilia
Abstract:The activity of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII:C) is reported to be between 5 and 40% in patients with mild haemophilia A (HA) 1. This disease is often diagnosed in adulthood due to bleeding episodes after trauma or surgery that require replacement therapy with FVIII concentrates (FVIIIc). Although FVIII inhibitors develop less frequently in mild HA patients than in those with severe HA, the development of inhibitors may become a major clinical problem because the inhibitor may inhibit both exogenous and endogenous FVIII, thereby converting the bleeding phenotype from mild to severe 1. We herein described the long-term treatment course of a patient with mild HA who developed a high titre FVIII inhibitor. The male patient was first diagnosed with mild HA at 76 years of age when he developed a postoperative bleeding complication following transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TUR-BT). A conventional coagulation test showed a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time of 46.2 s (control value, 29.1 s), his FVIII:C was 11%, and no inhibitor was detected. During the subsequent 7 months, he safely underwent a second TUR-BT and coronary artery bypass graft surgery for myocardial infarction with the continuous infusion of FVIIIc (Confact F®). However, postoperative bleeding persisted in the bladder when he underwent a third TUR-BT for a refractory lesion, in spite of intensive replacement therapy with FVIIIc. FVIII:C decreased below 1% and the Bethesda assay revealed the development of an inhibitor, the level of peaked at 160 Bethesda units per millilitre (Fig. 1). Frequent bleeding episodes were observed in the subcutaneous tissue, muscle and mucosa of the urogenital tract after the development of the inhibitor, which necessitated the repeated administration of the bypassing agent, recombinant activated factor VII (NovoSeven®; Novo Nordisc Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). He subsequently underwent reconstructive free-flap surgery following surgical removal of a subcutaneous haematoma associated with overlying skin necrosis of the dorsum of the left hand. We administered immunosuppressive treatment, which included prednisolone, oral cyclophosphamide and two cycles of rituximab (375 mg m−2 week−1 × 4 doses); however, even though its titre declined gradually, the inhibitor persisted for over 30 months (Fig. 1). FVIII:C finally became detectable approximately 3 years after the inhibitor developed, and bleeding episodes no longer developed thereafter. We are notified that his grandson is treated for haemophilia at another medical centre; however, further information is unavailable. Genetic analysis of the F8 gene was performed after obtaining informed consent from the patient. An intron 22 inversion and intron 1 inversion were screened by long-distance polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and multiplex PCR, respectively. Twenty-six exons and their franking regions were amplified by PCR using specific primers and analysed by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis followed by nucleotide sequencing. This analysis revealed the deletion of four nucleotides on the 3′ splice site of intron 1 (c.144-11 TCTT del), a missense mutation, c.3780C>G; p.D1241E in the B-domain and a mutation, c.*1672A>G in the 3′ untranslated region of exon 26. In contrast to patients with severe HA with FVIII inhibitors, for whom immune tolerance induction (ITI) is indicated to restore responsiveness to FVIII, patients with mild HA who develop inhibitors have been shown to respond poorly to ITI 2. Therefore, immune suppression therapy to eradicate inhibitors should be considered in patients with bleeding patterns similar to acquired haemophilia, as with the present case. A search of the literature found case reports or small case series of the successful use of rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, alone or in combination with high-dose FVIII for mild HA with inhibitors 3-6. Franchini et al. summarized published cases and reported a high response rate to rituximab in patients with mild/moderate HA 6. However, when the relationship between the rituximab treatment and response obtained in the present case was assessed, the effect of rituximab appeared to be limited even though the inhibitor titre transiently declined after the first cycle of rituximab. It may be more likely that the inhibitor declined and disappeared spontaneously by avoiding the administration of FVIIIc. Molecular genetic studies of HA have identified a wide variety of mutations; a total of 2107 unique mutations, including 158 splice-site mutations, are listed in the Haemophilia A Mutation Database 7. The type of mutation in the F8 gene has generally been associated with not only the severity of HA, but also the risk of the formation of inhibitors 8. Large deletions, inversions and nonsense mutations are associated with severe HA and the highest risk of inhibitor development, while missense mutations have accounted for approximately 90% of reported cases of mild HA, in which inhibitor development was an uncommon complication 1, 7, 9. c.3780C>G; p.D1241E and c.*1672A>G, which were identified in the present case, are included in the list of polymorphic nucleotide substitutions detected in the F8 gene of both normal subjects and HA patients 7, even though previous studies have shown that p.D1241E is associated with lower FVIII:C and that p.D1241E-containing haplotypes contribute to the high incidence of inhibitors 8, 10. On the other hand, c.144-11 TCTT del has not been registered in the database. This small deletion, which is located adjacent to the splice acceptor site of intron 1, may have affected structural and/or functional alterations in the F8 transcripts, thereby leading to the low FVIII:C observed in this case. Nevertheless, the mechanisms responsible for the development of inhibitors in patients with splicing mutations remain to be elucidated. The authors stated that they had no interests which might be perceived as posing a conflict or bias.